Tinker v. Des Moines- Sound or Unsound?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 07:48:09 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Tinker v. Des Moines- Sound or Unsound?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ?
#1
Sound
 
#2
Unsound
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 11

Author Topic: Tinker v. Des Moines- Sound or Unsound?  (Read 971 times)
hawkeye59
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,530
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 24, 2011, 04:02:26 PM »

Sound
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 24, 2011, 06:15:20 PM »

Both.

I agree with Fortas that the proactive ban against political armbands by the Des Moines schoolboard was wrong.  However, I think Fortas set the bar for what might be considered to be disruptive speech too high.
Logged
Guderian
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 575


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 24, 2011, 11:53:35 AM »

Unsound. No wonder only two respectable Justices on that Court, Black and Harlan, dissented.
Logged
hawkeye59
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,530
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 24, 2011, 01:03:06 PM »

Unsound. No wonder only two respectable Justices on that Court, Black and Harlan, dissented.
William Brennan isn't respectable? Thurgood Marshall? Earl Warren?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 14 queries.