Fallujah (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 03:41:29 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
  Fallujah (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Fallujah  (Read 3809 times)
rbt48
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,060


WWW
« on: December 12, 2004, 10:23:45 PM »

It is a little surprising to me that it has not entered into the political discussion (post election), that we waited until after 2 Nov to launch the long awaited takeover of Fallujah.  It appears quite likely to me that the administration waited until after the election because we were inevitably going to take many more casualties than we were by waiting.  It could be that we were waiting for legitimate reasons, like cooler weather arriving in November, intelligence of where the key leaders were, tightening the noose around the city, or waiting for our bombing to weaken the insurgents before our attack.

It just seems that the timing of our invasion of Fallujah would have stirred more controvery than it did.  Other than the newsman photographing the Marine shooting the wounded insurgent, there hasn't been much controversy.
Logged
rbt48
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,060


WWW
« Reply #1 on: December 20, 2004, 10:31:16 PM »

Boy, this topic has created a truly underwhelming quantity of responses.  Maybe I can come up with a more compelling topic next time.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 15 queries.