US Birth Rate plunges to record low in 2010
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 18, 2024, 08:36:40 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  US Birth Rate plunges to record low in 2010
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: US Birth Rate plunges to record low in 2010  (Read 1264 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,190
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: June 16, 2011, 01:19:35 AM »

Births:

4.007.000 (-129.000, -3.1%)

Deaths:

2.452.000 (+26.000, +1.1%)

Rates:

13.0 births per 1000 inhabitants
  7.9 deaths per 1000 inhabitants

National Release:

http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/provisional_tables/Provisional_Table01_2010Dec.pdf

State Release:

http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/provisional_tables/Provisional_Table02_2010Dec.pdf
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,190
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: June 16, 2011, 01:20:30 AM »

The previous record low was in 2002 with 13.9 births per 1000 people.

The good thing is that the death rate is also near a record low.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: June 16, 2011, 06:38:15 AM »

Just like in the last Depression.
Logged
Ban my account ffs!
snowguy716
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,632
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: June 16, 2011, 05:45:11 PM »

Just like in the last Depression.
Births were declining well before the last depression... that, like this time, was likely a product of immigration reduction as well as a bad economy.  Births peaked at just over 3 million in 1921 before falling slightly through 1925... but then began a huge slide after 1925 (coincidence, i think not) to 2.55 million by 1929.  Births actually rallied slightly in 1930 and then fell to 2.3 million by 1933.  Then began a slow rise from 1934-1938 before births rose significantly from 1939-1943 (to 3.1 million in 1943, before falling back to 2.9 million in 1945... then booming to record levels in 1946).

The birth patterns in this recession have been more akin to those of the early 70s.  The age structure of the population indicates that births should be rising, but instead they are falling.  While 4.3 to 4.0 million births is significant, there is evidence that births have already turned around for 2011.  It is nothing like the fall from 3.1 million to 2.3 million between 1921 and 1933 or the fall from 4.2 million from 1960 to 3.1 million in 1973.

In fact, I'd suspect that births will remain quite stable and grow with the population with few of the dips and rises since the major booms and busts have now kind of "bred" themselves out.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,190
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: June 18, 2011, 12:31:52 AM »

I´ve done some calculations, and unsurprisingly the states with the highest unemployment had the biggest decline in births between 2007 and 2010:

AZ: -15.0%
MS: -13.6%
NV: -12.7%
GA: -11.1%
FL: -10.3%
CA: -10.2%
RI: -10.1%
NM: -10.0%
IL:  -8.9%
MI: -8.6%

The only states where births increased between 2007 and 2010 were:

AK: +3.7%
ND: +3.3%

NY remained almost unchanged, all other states had declines between 1% and 9%.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,190
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: June 18, 2011, 12:37:33 AM »

I think AZ topping the list with the biggest decline in births has also to do with the fact that many Lations left the state because of the bad economy and because of the recent immigration law that was passed there.

AZ was also the state that had the biggest overestimate in the 2010 Census, with the Census result being considerably lower compared to the Mid-2009 population estimate.
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: June 18, 2011, 12:59:42 AM »

Washington's 2010 birth rate is just barely its record low at 12.88, beating 1933's 12.89.
Logged
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: June 29, 2011, 02:25:17 PM »

It could be fertility reductions amongst Mexican-Americans.
Logged
All Along The Watchtower
Progressive Realist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,610
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: June 30, 2011, 07:59:40 PM »

People aren't having as many children during a huge recession. What a surprise.
Logged
Oswald Acted Alone, You Kook
The Obamanation
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,853
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: June 30, 2011, 08:02:14 PM »

That's why they call it the "New Silent Generation" 1994-present.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.033 seconds with 9 queries.