PA Gubernatorial Race 2006

[Keystone Phil]

Castor considers run for Governor.

http://www.kywnewsradio.com/news_story_detail.cfm?newsitemid=45290


Rendell, Piccola, Scranton, Swann....everyone considering a run for Gov. in 2006 are afraid now...

[Keystone Phil]

Castor considers run for Governor.

http://www.kywnewsradio.com/news_story_detail.cfm?newsitemid=45290


Rendell, Piccola, Scranton, Swann....everyone considering a run for Gov. in 2006 are afraid now...

I want PA Dems to see this and see if they insist that their Eddie is still safe for re-election.

[TeePee4Prez]

Castor considers run for Governor.

http://www.kywnewsradio.com/news_story_detail.cfm?newsitemid=45290


Rendell, Piccola, Scranton, Swann....everyone considering a run for Gov. in 2006 are afraid now...

I want PA Dems to see this and see if they insist that their Eddie is still safe for re-election.

Yes he is.  Remember Ed Rendell has WAY more star power than Bruce Castor.

[bullmoose88]

Rendell's pretty safe.

This state has a habit of sticking 8 years per party control for governor.

[Keystone Phil]

Castor considers run for Governor.

http://www.kywnewsradio.com/news_story_detail.cfm?newsitemid=45290


Rendell, Piccola, Scranton, Swann....everyone considering a run for Gov. in 2006 are afraid now...

I want PA Dems to see this and see if they insist that their Eddie is still safe for re-election.

Yes he is.  Remember Ed Rendell has WAY more star power than Bruce Castor.

You're crazy. Castor will cut into Rendell's base big time and the west can't stand Rendell to begin with.

[Jake]

What was it we were talking about Phil ?  A Castor/Swann ticket ?

[Keystone Phil]

What was it we were talking about Phil ?  A Castor/Swann ticket ?

Yes. Though Castor/Pippy would be a pretty good ticket, too.

[Keystone Phil]

New Rendell approval/disapproval ratings here, folks.

http://politicspa.com/temp/clay_2f.htm

[bullmoose88]

Castor considers run for Governor.

http://www.kywnewsradio.com/news_story_detail.cfm?newsitemid=45290


Rendell, Piccola, Scranton, Swann....everyone considering a run for Gov. in 2006 are afraid now...

I want PA Dems to see this and see if they insist that their Eddie is still safe for re-election.

Yes he is.  Remember Ed Rendell has WAY more star power than Bruce Castor.

You're crazy. Castor will cut into Rendell's base big time and the west can't stand Rendell to begin with.

Phil,

You dream. No offense dude.

Rendell's still going to run on his record as mayor...and he'll win big in the SE.

This state likes to have two term governors.

[Keystone Phil]

Castor considers run for Governor.

http://www.kywnewsradio.com/news_story_detail.cfm?newsitemid=45290


Rendell, Piccola, Scranton, Swann....everyone considering a run for Gov. in 2006 are afraid now...

I want PA Dems to see this and see if they insist that their Eddie is still safe for re-election.

Yes he is.  Remember Ed Rendell has WAY more star power than Bruce Castor.

You're crazy. Castor will cut into Rendell's base big time and the west can't stand Rendell to begin with.

Phil,

You dream. No offense dude.

Rendell's still going to run on his record as mayor...and he'll win big in the SE.

This state likes to have two term governors.

I dream? You're doubting Castor's popularity, dude? Do you realize his re-election results, dude? Do you realize that the west went for Rendell in 2002 but he's disliked out there, dude?

How can you say that Castor wouldn't cut into Rendell's base here? Rendell won Montco by about 36%. He wouldn't even get close to winning by that much if he had to run against Castor. That's not a dream. Now if I said Swann would cut into the base big time, then you could say I'm dreaming but you obviously don't understand the issue here.

 Flyers is this ultimate partisan hack who admires Rendell to no end. Rendell does no wrong, in his eyes.. I'm surprised you decided to go along with his nonsense on this issue.

[No more McShame]

New Rendell approval/disapproval ratings here, folks.

http://politicspa.com/temp/clay_2f.htm

I'm interested in what the Democrat reaction to these numbers are considering last summer a sub-50% number for Bush meant he was toast.  Now Eddie is in the same situation.  Somehow I don't think they are going to say he's toast.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

New Rendell approval/disapproval ratings here, folks.

http://politicspa.com/temp/clay_2f.htm

I'm interested in what the Democrat reaction to these numbers are considering last summer a sub-50% number for Bush meant he was toast.  Now Eddie is in the same situation.  Somehow I don't think they are going to say he's toast.

The difference is Bush had very low (typically 5% or less) undecided.

[danwxman]

New Rendell approval/disapproval ratings here, folks.

http://politicspa.com/temp/clay_2f.htm

I'm interested in what the Democrat reaction to these numbers are considering last summer a sub-50% number for Bush meant he was toast.  Now Eddie is in the same situation.  Somehow I don't think they are going to say he's toast.

Rendell has no strong challenger.

[Keystone Phil]

New Rendell approval/disapproval ratings here, folks.

http://politicspa.com/temp/clay_2f.htm

I'm interested in what the Democrat reaction to these numbers are considering last summer a sub-50% number for Bush meant he was toast.  Now Eddie is in the same situation.  Somehow I don't think they are going to say he's toast.

Rendell has no strong challenger.

Bruce Castor wouldn't be a strong challenger? Here's a suggestion: Give up being a partisan hack for one day.

[No more McShame]

New Rendell approval/disapproval ratings here, folks.

http://politicspa.com/temp/clay_2f.htm

I'm interested in what the Democrat reaction to these numbers are considering last summer a sub-50% number for Bush meant he was toast.  Now Eddie is in the same situation.  Somehow I don't think they are going to say he's toast.

Rendell has no strong challenger.

We're still 18 months away from the election.  One could easily emerge in that timeframe.

[Keystone Phil]

New Rendell approval/disapproval ratings here, folks.

http://politicspa.com/temp/clay_2f.htm

I'm interested in what the Democrat reaction to these numbers are considering last summer a sub-50% number for Bush meant he was toast.  Now Eddie is in the same situation.  Somehow I don't think they are going to say he's toast.

Rendell has no strong challenger.

We're still 18 months away from the election.  One could easily emerge in that timeframe.

Here's the thing: If Montgomery county DA Bruce Castor runs, he will be the strongest challenger and would turn this into a very interesting race. Some PA Dems (danwxman) will refuse to admit it though. Got to love those partisan hacks.

[danwxman]

New Rendell approval/disapproval ratings here, folks.

http://politicspa.com/temp/clay_2f.htm

I'm interested in what the Democrat reaction to these numbers are considering last summer a sub-50% number for Bush meant he was toast.  Now Eddie is in the same situation.  Somehow I don't think they are going to say he's toast.

Rendell has no strong challenger.

Bruce Castor wouldn't be a strong challenger? Here's a suggestion: Give up being a partisan hack for one day.

lol....notice you are the only one who thinks that. You're such a horrible debater.

[danwxman]

New Rendell approval/disapproval ratings here, folks.

http://politicspa.com/temp/clay_2f.htm

I'm interested in what the Democrat reaction to these numbers are considering last summer a sub-50% number for Bush meant he was toast.  Now Eddie is in the same situation.  Somehow I don't think they are going to say he's toast.

Rendell has no strong challenger.

We're still 18 months away from the election.  One could easily emerge in that timeframe.

Here's the thing: If Montgomery county DA Bruce Castor runs, he will be the strongest challenger and would turn this into a very interesting race. Some PA Dems (danwxman) will refuse to admit it though. Got to love those partisan hacks.

Umm, I haven't even commented on Castor yet. At this point, Rendell has no strong challengers. Sorry my friend.

[Keystone Phil]

New Rendell approval/disapproval ratings here, folks.

http://politicspa.com/temp/clay_2f.htm

I'm interested in what the Democrat reaction to these numbers are considering last summer a sub-50% number for Bush meant he was toast.  Now Eddie is in the same situation.  Somehow I don't think they are going to say he's toast.

Rendell has no strong challenger.

Bruce Castor wouldn't be a strong challenger? Here's a suggestion: Give up being a partisan hack for one day.

lol....notice you are the only one who thinks that. You're such a horrible debater.

I'm the only one that thinks what? That Castor would be a strong challenger? Ask Flyers what he thinks. And my debating skills have nothing to do with who can win. It's not my fault if hacks like yourself are so abundant on this forum.

[danwxman]

New Rendell approval/disapproval ratings here, folks.

http://politicspa.com/temp/clay_2f.htm

I'm interested in what the Democrat reaction to these numbers are considering last summer a sub-50% number for Bush meant he was toast.  Now Eddie is in the same situation.  Somehow I don't think they are going to say he's toast.

Rendell has no strong challenger.

Bruce Castor wouldn't be a strong challenger? Here's a suggestion: Give up being a partisan hack for one day.

lol....notice you are the only one who thinks that. You're such a horrible debater.

I'm the only one that thinks what? That Castor would be a strong challenger? Ask Flyers what he thinks. And my debating skills have nothing to do with who can win. It's not my fault if hacks like yourself are so abundant on this forum.

I'm a partisan hack? Pot --> Kettle --> Black

[Keystone Phil]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Umm, I haven't even commented on Castor yet. At this point, Rendell has no strong challengers. Sorry my friend.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Really?

New Rendell approval/disapproval ratings here, folks.

http://politicspa.com/temp/clay_2f.htm

I'm interested in what the Democrat reaction to these numbers are considering last summer a sub-50% number for Bush meant he was toast.  Now Eddie is in the same situation.  Somehow I don't think they are going to say he's toast.

Rendell has no strong challenger.

Bruce Castor wouldn't be a strong challenger? Here's a suggestion: Give up being a partisan hack for one day.

lol....notice you are the only one who thinks that. You're such a horrible debater.

You're such an idiot.

[Keystone Phil]

New Rendell approval/disapproval ratings here, folks.

http://politicspa.com/temp/clay_2f.htm

I'm interested in what the Democrat reaction to these numbers are considering last summer a sub-50% number for Bush meant he was toast.  Now Eddie is in the same situation.  Somehow I don't think they are going to say he's toast.

Rendell has no strong challenger.

Bruce Castor wouldn't be a strong challenger? Here's a suggestion: Give up being a partisan hack for one day.

lol....notice you are the only one who thinks that. You're such a horrible debater.

I'm the only one that thinks what? That Castor would be a strong challenger? Ask Flyers what he thinks. And my debating skills have nothing to do with who can win. It's not my fault if hacks like yourself are so abundant on this forum.

I'm a partisan hack? Pot --> Kettle --> Black

In your eyes, Rendell is invinsible. You're the perfect example of a partisan hack.

[danwxman]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Umm, I haven't even commented on Castor yet. At this point, Rendell has no strong challengers. Sorry my friend.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Really?

New Rendell approval/disapproval ratings here, folks.

http://politicspa.com/temp/clay_2f.htm

I'm interested in what the Democrat reaction to these numbers are considering last summer a sub-50% number for Bush meant he was toast.  Now Eddie is in the same situation.  Somehow I don't think they are going to say he's toast.

Rendell has no strong challenger.

Bruce Castor wouldn't be a strong challenger? Here's a suggestion: Give up being a partisan hack for one day.

lol....notice you are the only one who thinks that. You're such a horrible debater.

You're such an idiot.

I haven't made any comments on what I think about Castor...all I know is that even bullmoose disputes your claim.

[danwxman]

New Rendell approval/disapproval ratings here, folks.

http://politicspa.com/temp/clay_2f.htm

I'm interested in what the Democrat reaction to these numbers are considering last summer a sub-50% number for Bush meant he was toast.  Now Eddie is in the same situation.  Somehow I don't think they are going to say he's toast.

Rendell has no strong challenger.

Bruce Castor wouldn't be a strong challenger? Here's a suggestion: Give up being a partisan hack for one day.

lol....notice you are the only one who thinks that. You're such a horrible debater.

I'm the only one that thinks what? That Castor would be a strong challenger? Ask Flyers what he thinks. And my debating skills have nothing to do with who can win. It's not my fault if hacks like yourself are so abundant on this forum.

I'm a partisan hack? Pot --> Kettle --> Black

In your eyes, Rendell is invinsible. You're the perfect example of a partisan hack.

I would be a partisan hack if only Democrats thought Rendell was invinsible...fact of the matter is even most Republicans on this board recognize Rendell will easily win re-election. Why? All challengers polling way behind, and no incumbent Governor has ever been defeated. You have a very hard time dealing with facts, Phil.

[Keystone Phil]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Umm, I haven't even commented on Castor yet. At this point, Rendell has no strong challengers. Sorry my friend.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Really?

New Rendell approval/disapproval ratings here, folks.

http://politicspa.com/temp/clay_2f.htm

I'm interested in what the Democrat reaction to these numbers are considering last summer a sub-50% number for Bush meant he was toast.  Now Eddie is in the same situation.  Somehow I don't think they are going to say he's toast.

Rendell has no strong challenger.

Bruce Castor wouldn't be a strong challenger? Here's a suggestion: Give up being a partisan hack for one day.

lol....notice you are the only one who thinks that. You're such a horrible debater.

You're such an idiot.

I haven't made any comments on what I think about Castor...all I know is that even bullmoose disputes your claim.

You were saying that I'm the only one that believed he was a strong candidate and made that seem foolish. Also, if you can't admit here and now that Castor is a strong candidate, than you're a partisan hack. No doubt about it.