Dream Election 2012: Obama (D) vs. Cain (R) vs. McMillan (R2DH)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 11:29:39 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Alternative Elections (Moderator: Dereich)
  Dream Election 2012: Obama (D) vs. Cain (R) vs. McMillan (R2DH)
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: WHO WOULD YOU VOTE FOR?
#1
Obama/Biden
 
#2
Cain/Gingrich
 
#3
McMillan/Gravel
 
#4
Fourth-party
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 11

Author Topic: Dream Election 2012: Obama (D) vs. Cain (R) vs. McMillan (R2DH)  (Read 1697 times)
JacobNC
psychicpanda
Rookie
**
Posts: 175
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 11, 2011, 07:01:27 PM »

2012


Barack Obama / Joe Biden - 52%
DEMOCRAT - ILLINOIS / DELAWARE


Herman Cain / Newt Gingrich - 38%
REPUBLICAN - GEORGIA / GEORGIA


(this is all hypothetical - I know Newt Gingrich would never be anyone's Vice President)


Jimmy McMillan / Mike Gravel - 10%
RENT IS TOO DAMN HIGH - NEW YORK / ALASKA


___________________________________________________________________________



Obama wins in an electoral landslide.  WV, KY, AR & TN go for Obama because he is whiter than Cain & you know how much those old people love their Medicare.

Cain takes traditionally Republican states including his home state of Georgia.  He loses the black vote to Obama & McMillan 15-60-25.

McMillan finishes strong in Montana, Minnesota, Vermont & Alaska but does not get more than 40% in any state.  He finishes second to Cain in Idaho and second to Obama in Hawaii.

Thoughts?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.046 seconds with 15 queries.