Another meaningless state poll...
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 02:02:25 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election
  Another meaningless state poll...		 « previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Another meaningless state poll...  (Read 4065 times)
agcatter
agcat
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,740


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 21, 2004, 10:04:41 AM »
8 months out!  Sheesh.  Mason-Dixon has Bush up 11 pts in Nevada.  This has gotten so ridiculous that I'm even getting tired of the polls showing us leading.  I've never seen so many polls and I've never ever seen so many polls this darned early.  We're drowning in them...and it's March!
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,779


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 21, 2004, 10:06:13 AM »
Let's analyze it anyway! Smiley

It's definitely good for Bush, that's for sure. Smiley
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,726
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: March 21, 2004, 10:09:54 AM »
I don't like Nevada...
Logged
agcatter
agcat
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,740


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: March 21, 2004, 10:10:09 AM »
Gustaf, we will no doubt analyze it..and analyze it...and then we'll probably analyze it some more.
Logged
agcatter
agcat
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,740


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: March 21, 2004, 10:11:01 AM »
Al, I don't either.  I lost my rear last time I went to Vegas.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,779


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: March 21, 2004, 10:17:05 AM »
Seriously, the real point on polls right now are to try and determine the relation to national average, to see which states will be in play, etc.
Logged
agcatter
agcat
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,740


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: March 21, 2004, 10:22:45 AM »
I know, but I still got killed at the blackjack table.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,726
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: March 21, 2004, 10:27:55 AM »
Gambling, Prostitution, The Mafia The Cosa Nostra "Respectable Businessmen", A huge Desert, a landscape that makes Nebraska look pretty... etc. etc.

Part of the "Great Basin" BTW. Make of that what you will...
Logged
CTguy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 742


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: March 21, 2004, 01:41:11 PM »
I think that is the most accurate state map I have seen, except I would put colorado in light blue and New Hampshire in dark red.
Logged
MarkDel
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,149


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: March 21, 2004, 02:54:35 PM »
Vorlon,

Your map looks OK except New Mexico should be in Blue.
Logged
CTguy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 742


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: March 21, 2004, 03:20:12 PM »
Yeah right, because the democrats won it in 2000 on the hispanic vote and they just elected a democratic hispanic governor...  and the hispanic voting population has increased...  

New Mexico won't go for Bush even though he has done nothing but pander to Mexicans while jeopardizing our safety so illegals can flood the border.
Logged
MarkDel
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,149


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: March 21, 2004, 03:30:29 PM »
CTGuy,

Gore won New Mexico by 300 VOTES in 2000. The state can go either way.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: March 21, 2004, 03:33:11 PM »
Unless Richardspn is the VP, Bush has NM in the bag.
Logged
MarkDel
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,149


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: March 21, 2004, 03:35:40 PM »
Miami,

I agree Richardson would carry New Mexico for Kerry.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,779


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: March 21, 2004, 03:49:57 PM »
Quote from: The Vorlon on March 21, 2004, 03:47:46 PM
Quote from: CTguy on March 21, 2004, 01:41:11 PM
I think that is the most accurate state map I have seen, except I would put colorado in light blue and New Hampshire in dark red.

Yikes... you agree with me on every state but Colorado should "lean" Bush rather than solid Bush, and New Hampshire should be solid Kerry, not "lean" Kerry...

Darn it some folks are hard to please... Smiley

Could you also please change your colour scheme, the lean Bush colour is a little too bright... Wink
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: March 21, 2004, 05:44:08 PM »
Quote from: Al on March 21, 2004, 10:27:55 AM
Gambling, Prostitution, The Mafia The Cosa Nostra "Respectable Businessmen", A huge Desert, a landscape that makes Nebraska look pretty... etc. etc.

Part of the "Great Basin" BTW. Make of that what you will...

Did you ever see that show 'Reno911'? - its a spoof on white-trash Cops shows.  Very funny.
Logged
angus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,424
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: March 21, 2004, 11:44:02 PM »
Quote from: MarkDel on March 21, 2004, 02:54:35 PM
Vorlon,

Your map looks OK except New Mexico should be in Blue.

And the granite state as well.  This is like RISK!

opebo, now I understand you so much better  Wink

You too Agcat.  Blackjack is fun, but a harsh mistress.
Logged
ian
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,461


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: -1.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: March 22, 2004, 12:38:56 AM »
Quote from: CTguy on March 21, 2004, 03:20:12 PM
New Mexico won't go for Bush even though he has done nothing but pander to Mexicans while jeopardizing our safety so illegals can flood the border.

That is completely fantastic.  Nobody has brought up the safety of Americans in the proposition of Bush's stupid immigration bill ever.  I am so glad that someone actually sees that the immigration policy is awful b/c of the threat of safety of Americans.  Great point!!!
Logged
ian
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,461


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: -1.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: March 22, 2004, 12:39:36 AM »
Quote from: CTguy on March 21, 2004, 03:20:12 PM
Yeah right, because the democrats won it in 2000 on the hispanic vote and they just elected a democratic hispanic governor...  and the hispanic voting population has increased...  

New Mexico won't go for Bush even though he has done nothing but pander to Mexicans while jeopardizing our safety so illegals can flood the border.

Oh, yeah, and Kerry will definitely take New Mexico.
Logged
Platypus
hughento
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,478
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: March 22, 2004, 01:38:14 AM »
the day of mourning is apon us. We have a rascist Democrat.

NOOO
Logged
Ben.
Ben
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,249


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: March 22, 2004, 03:46:50 AM »
   
Quote from: hughento on March 22, 2004, 01:38:14 AM
the day of mourning is apon us. We have a rascist Democrat.

NOOO

I don’t think he's being a racist, Bush's immigration policy is pure Bush irresponsible and takes no regard to the safety of American citizens....we cannot afford to have unchecked immigration from south and central America... so simmer down and don’t be so PC!....
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.045 seconds with 13 queries.