Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ) in critical condition, 6 others killed in Arizona
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 17, 2024, 06:49:38 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ) in critical condition, 6 others killed in Arizona
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 21 22 23 24 ... 32
Author Topic: Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ) in critical condition, 6 others killed in Arizona  (Read 75777 times)
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,264
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #450 on: January 09, 2011, 09:15:49 AM »

Palin's rhetoric dramatically banalized violence in politics, and that's why some insane has decided to act.
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #451 on: January 09, 2011, 09:18:23 AM »

Palin? What on Earth does Palin have to do with this? Of all the rhetoric in recent times...I find it rather amusing that you single Palin out.
Logged
Storebought
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,326
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #452 on: January 09, 2011, 09:26:30 AM »

What else can you say that a certain segment of the left needs ... deperately needs ... a pretext of this sort to use state force to silence the Tea Party, even when the situtation does not at all serve the purpose.
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #453 on: January 09, 2011, 09:36:43 AM »

What else can you say that a certain segment of the left needs ... deperately needs ... a pretext of this sort to use state force to silence the Tea Party, even when the situtation does not at all serve the purpose.

In the left's defense, who has demanded that the Tea Party be silenced by "state force"? I haven't heard anyone even cone close to that.
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,410
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #454 on: January 09, 2011, 09:44:13 AM »

This thread is a nice trainwreck.
Logged
You kip if you want to...
change08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,940
United Kingdom
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #455 on: January 09, 2011, 09:44:38 AM »

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0111/47307.html

Hero.
Logged
Storebought
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,326
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #456 on: January 09, 2011, 09:46:09 AM »

What else can you say that a certain segment of the left needs ... deperately needs ... a pretext of this sort to use state force to silence the Tea Party, even when the situtation does not at all serve the purpose.

In the left's defense, who has demanded that the Tea Party be silenced by "state force"? I haven't heard anyone even cone close to that.

The Austrian kid mentioned something about using some law, or something, to silence Palin if her blogs were discovered on the shooter's computer.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,989
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #457 on: January 09, 2011, 09:51:26 AM »

What else can you say that a certain segment of the left needs ... deperately needs ... a pretext of this sort to use state force to silence the Tea Party, even when the situtation does not at all serve the purpose.

In the left's defense, who has demanded that the Tea Party be silenced by "state force"? I haven't heard anyone even cone close to that.

The Austrian kid mentioned something about using some law, or something, to silence Palin if her blogs were discovered on the shooter's computer.

The "Austrian Kid" is part of the American Left?
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #458 on: January 09, 2011, 09:52:41 AM »

What else can you say that a certain segment of the left needs ... deperately needs ... a pretext of this sort to use state force to silence the Tea Party, even when the situtation does not at all serve the purpose.

In the left's defense, who has demanded that the Tea Party be silenced by "state force"? I haven't heard anyone even cone close to that.

The Austrian kid mentioned something about using some law, or something, to silence Palin if her blogs were discovered on the shooter's computer.

The "Austrian Kid" is part of the American Left?

Those damn foreigners.
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #459 on: January 09, 2011, 09:57:21 AM »

Btw, what members of Congress have their security details? I bet Speaker have one. Others?
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #460 on: January 09, 2011, 09:59:18 AM »

Palin's rhetoric dramatically banalized violence in politics, and that's why some insane has decided to act.

Violence in politics has banalized since 1963, if not 1865.

From what we are hearing, the guy had some psychological problems (and may have wanted to impress Mylie Cyrus, for all I know).

From what I've heard about Gifford, she was not a flaming liberal and joined in the reading of the Constitution last week.
Logged
Middle-aged Europe
Old Europe
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,246
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #461 on: January 09, 2011, 10:02:09 AM »

Btw, what members of Congress have their security details? I bet Speaker have one. Others?

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-congress-security-20110109,0,6401925.story
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #462 on: January 09, 2011, 10:02:09 AM »

Btw, what members of Congress have their security details? I bet Speaker have one. Others?

In the 1990's Gingrich had a single security officer that doubled as a driver; it became a political issue in one campaign.
Logged
Storebought
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,326
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #463 on: January 09, 2011, 10:02:43 AM »
« Edited: January 09, 2011, 10:04:14 AM by Storebought »

What else can you say that a certain segment of the left needs ... deperately needs ... a pretext of this sort to use state force to silence the Tea Party, even when the situtation does not at all serve the purpose.

In the left's defense, who has demanded that the Tea Party be silenced by "state force"? I haven't heard anyone even cone close to that.

The Austrian kid mentioned something about using some law, or something, to silence Palin if her blogs were discovered on the shooter's computer.

The "Austrian Kid" is part of the American Left?

The sentiment was expressed here by a foreigner, but the idea of banning hate speech, which they presume Palin expounds, certainly exists among the American left. **
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,802
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #464 on: January 09, 2011, 10:04:11 AM »

The situation kept moving so the opportunity to reply to this last night wasn't really there. So I'll do it now, even though it's not massively relevant to recent developments.

The trouble is, it's a reasonable conclusion to leap to (for various reasons) even if it may well be wrong. Violent political language often leads to political violence, though, of course, we don't know whether that was the case here.

That is pure nonsense, whose logical conclusion would lead to a ban on political speech lest someone get hurt.   The only conclusion that is reasonable to leap to is no conclusion at all until all the facts are known.  The shooter could have any motivation or no motivation at all.

No, that is absolutely not the logical conclusion of such concerns. The logical conclusion would be to avoid using violent (a few posts on the term switched to 'hateful'; I would argue that there's an important distinction, actually) language against political opponents, something that is (happily) not hard to do.

Of course the situation has moved on and we now know more about the person that did this (who appears to be a standard issue anti-system lunatic) so making assertions relating to the more extreme rhetoric associated with the 'Tea Party' is not reasonable or particularly fair, at least based on the information that we have at the moment. But as an immediate reaction, before anything was known about the killer?

But, again, the situation has moved on now. This was political - any attempt to kill a politician at a public event is political - but it's the politics of the fetid darkness beyond the fringes, and not of large political movements (whatever we might personally think of them).

I just wanted to clear that up, or at least try to.
Logged
exopolitician
MATCHU[D]
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,892
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.03, S: -6.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #465 on: January 09, 2011, 10:07:00 AM »

What else can you say that a certain segment of the left needs ... deperately needs ... a pretext of this sort to use state force to silence the Tea Party, even when the situtation does not at all serve the purpose.

In the left's defense, who has demanded that the Tea Party be silenced by "state force"? I haven't heard anyone even cone close to that.

The Austrian kid mentioned something about using some law, or something, to silence Palin if her blogs were discovered on the shooter's computer.

The "Austrian Kid" is part of the American Left?

The sentiment was expressed here by a foreigner, but the idea of banning hate speech, which they presume Palin expounds, certainly exists among the American left. **


Not ban it, but she definitely needs to watch what she says. That goes for anyone in both parties.
Logged
Iosif
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,609


Political Matrix
E: -1.68, S: -3.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #466 on: January 09, 2011, 10:09:25 AM »

From what I've heard about Gifford, she was not a flaming liberal

I guess she didn't deserve it then.
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #467 on: January 09, 2011, 10:13:32 AM »

From what I've heard about Gifford, she was not a flaming liberal

I guess she didn't deserve it then.

Sorry, J.J., but it sounded like "if she were a flaming liberal then..."
Logged
anvi
anvikshiki
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,400
Netherlands


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #468 on: January 09, 2011, 10:16:41 AM »

I can't help but reproduce here a quote from the story posted by Refudiate, from Daniel Hernandez, 30, who rushed to Giffords' aid after she was shot, probably while shots were still being fired, and helped control the bleeding until the paramedics arrived.

“You just have to be calm and collected.  You do no good to anyone if you have a breakdown.. .. It was probably not the best idea to run toward the gunshots, but people needed help.”




Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,190
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #469 on: January 09, 2011, 10:18:56 AM »

What else can you say that a certain segment of the left needs ... deperately needs ... a pretext of this sort to use state force to silence the Tea Party, even when the situtation does not at all serve the purpose.

In the left's defense, who has demanded that the Tea Party be silenced by "state force"? I haven't heard anyone even cone close to that.

The Austrian kid mentioned something about using some law, or something, to silence Palin if her blogs were discovered on the shooter's computer.

The "Austrian Kid" is part of the American Left?

The sentiment was expressed here by a foreigner, but the idea of banning hate speech, which they presume Palin expounds, certainly exists among the American left. **

This could be probably used here:

U.S. Code TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 102 > § 2101 > Riots

Whoever travels in interstate or foreign commerce or uses any facility of interstate or foreign commerce, including, but not limited to, the mail, telegraph, telephone, radio, or television, with intent—

(1) to incite a riot; or
(2) to organize, promote, encourage, participate in, or carry on a riot; or
(3) to commit any act of violence in furtherance of a riot; or
(4) to aid or abet any person in inciting or participating in or carrying on a riot or committing any act of violence in furtherance of a riot;

and who either during the course of any such travel or use or thereafter performs or attempts to perform any other overt act for any purpose specified in subparagraph (A), (B), (C), or (D) of this paragraph— [1]

Shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/usc_sec_18_00002101----000-.html

In Austria it is normal that the Greens file lawsuits all the time regarding "incitement of hatred" when the FPÖ crosses some line ... Wink

It would probably be rejected anyway, but Palin should better watch out in the future what she says and does.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #470 on: January 09, 2011, 10:21:15 AM »

From what I've heard about Gifford, she was not a flaming liberal

I guess she didn't deserve it then.

Pelosi, who is a flaming liberal, wouldn't deserve it.  I guess you'd think Darrell Issa would, right?

Had Kelly won, he would not have deserved it.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #471 on: January 09, 2011, 10:25:29 AM »

From what I've heard about Gifford, she was not a flaming liberal

I guess she didn't deserve it then.

Sorry, J.J., but it sounded like "if she were a flaming liberal then..."

No, but if the guy was acting on a political basis, as has been suggested by some of the left leaning folks here, Gifford would not be good target.
Logged
Storebought
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,326
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #472 on: January 09, 2011, 10:40:25 AM »
« Edited: January 09, 2011, 10:44:54 AM by Storebought »

What else can you say that a certain segment of the left needs ... deperately needs ... a pretext of this sort to use state force to silence the Tea Party, even when the situtation does not at all serve the purpose.

In the left's defense, who has demanded that the Tea Party be silenced by "state force"? I haven't heard anyone even cone close to that.

The Austrian kid mentioned something about using some law, or something, to silence Palin if her blogs were discovered on the shooter's computer.

The "Austrian Kid" is part of the American Left?

The sentiment was expressed here by a foreigner, but the idea of banning hate speech, which they presume Palin expounds, certainly exists among the American left. **

This could be probably used here:

U.S. Code TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 102 > § 2101 > Riots

Whoever travels in interstate or foreign commerce or uses any facility of interstate or foreign commerce, including, but not limited to, the mail, telegraph, telephone, radio, or television, with intent—

(1) to incite a riot; or
(2) to organize, promote, encourage, participate in, or carry on a riot; or
(3) to commit any act of violence in furtherance of a riot; or
(4) to aid or abet any person in inciting or participating in or carrying on a riot or committing any act of violence in furtherance of a riot;

and who either during the course of any such travel or use or thereafter performs or attempts to perform any other overt act for any purpose specified in subparagraph (A), (B), (C), or (D) of this paragraph— [1]

Shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/usc_sec_18_00002101----000-.html

In Austria it is normal that the Greens file lawsuits all the time regarding "incitement of hatred" when the FPÖ crosses some line ... Wink

It would probably be rejected anyway, but Palin should better watch out in the future what she says and does.

I hardly agree that what Palin tweets can "incite a riot," or encourages non-psychotics to participate in one.

My biggest fear is that the Left will allow make use of the antics of a psychotic to suppress through government (eg. some injunction or executive order) the speech of people who already believe that the left uses government to infringe on their rights of association and expression. The Justice department hacking Palin's tweets, for ex., would undoubtedly instigate popular violence.
Logged
Insula Dei
belgiansocialist
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,326
Belgium


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #473 on: January 09, 2011, 10:43:06 AM »

From what I've heard about Gifford, she was not a flaming liberal

I guess she didn't deserve it then.

Sorry, J.J., but it sounded like "if she were a flaming liberal then..."

No, but if the guy was acting on a political basis, as has been suggested by some of the left leaning folks here, Gifford would not be good target.

Well, she'd make a more logical target than a liberal congressman in a liberal district because the killer could have felt she was a 'traitor'. Also, the guy just seems to have gone with whoever he had acces to, so the mere fact of being a democrat could have been sufficient.
Logged
afleitch
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,909


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #474 on: January 09, 2011, 10:48:50 AM »


I hardly agree that what Palin tweets can "incite a riot," or encourages non-psychotics to participate in one.

My biggest fear is that the Left will allow make use of the antics of a psychotic to suppress through government (eg. some injunction or executive order) the speech of people who already believe that the left uses government to infringe on their rights of association and expression. The Justice department hacking Palin's tweets, for ex., would undoubtedly instigate popular violence.

The fact you 'fear' this will happen says a lot about your state of mind.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 21 22 23 24 ... 32  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.068 seconds with 10 queries.