IL: Chicago Tribune/WGN: Kirk 44% Giannoulias 41%
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 07:28:26 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2010 Elections
  2010 Senatorial Election Polls
  IL: Chicago Tribune/WGN: Kirk 44% Giannoulias 41%
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: IL: Chicago Tribune/WGN: Kirk 44% Giannoulias 41%  (Read 1422 times)
mypalfish
Rookie
**
Posts: 236


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 24, 2010, 10:13:23 PM »

Kirk 44%
Giannoulias 41%

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/elections/ct-met-us-senate-campaign-20101024,0,6957258.story
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 24, 2010, 10:17:33 PM »

Now that's very interesting.
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 24, 2010, 10:18:18 PM »

Methinks Kirk has an edge at this point. A shame.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,521
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 25, 2010, 12:14:08 AM »

Yeah, finally flipping this one... still a tossup though.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,156
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 25, 2010, 12:45:54 AM »

Itīs a registered voter poll too ... Tongue

...

Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 25, 2010, 12:47:31 AM »

21% Undecided in Chicago?
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,156
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 25, 2010, 12:49:31 AM »


Not really, because the "others" are in this as well. And Jones & Labno are getting 5 & 4%.
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 25, 2010, 12:52:07 AM »


Not really, because the "others" are in this as well. And Jones & Labno are getting 5 & 4%.

Is that a higher percentage than what they're getting in other parts of the state?
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,156
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 25, 2010, 12:57:29 AM »


Not really, because the "others" are in this as well. And Jones & Labno are getting 5 & 4%.

Is that a higher percentage than what they're getting in other parts of the state?

The 5 & 4% are the statewide figures, itīs not mentioned what share they have in each area.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,521
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 25, 2010, 01:15:10 AM »


Those are the dead people, you see. The party bosses haven't decided how they'll vote yet.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,866
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 25, 2010, 01:16:34 AM »

FWIW, PPP had 23% of Democrats undecided in their last poll (and only 6% of Republicans).
Logged
Dgov
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,558
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 25, 2010, 01:27:37 AM »


Not really, because the "others" are in this as well. And Jones & Labno are getting 5 & 4%.

Is that a higher percentage than what they're getting in other parts of the state?

I assume so.  Seeing as the 3rd-parties are pretty Left-wing (from what I can tell), it makes sense they'd be doing much better than average in the most Liberal part of the state (like how Nader did 3-4 times better in Travis County than in texas as a whole).

What surprises me is that Krik is losing suburban Cook county, which is his home region.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,719


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 25, 2010, 01:44:04 AM »

I assume so.  Seeing as the 3rd-parties are pretty Left-wing (from what I can tell), it makes sense they'd be doing much better than average in the most Liberal part of the state (like how Nader did 3-4 times better in Travis County than in texas as a whole).

What surprises me is that Krik is losing suburban Cook county, which is his home region.

Suburban Cook County isn't as monolithic as one might think.  There are white suburbs, black suburbs, Hispanic suburbs, Jewish suburbs, rich suburbs, middle-class suburbs, and even some poor suburbs.  Kirk only represents a fraction of suburban Cook County - the far north Cook county suburbs.  His IL-10 also includes a good portion of Lake County.

Kirk is probably doing well in most North and Northwest Cook County suburbs and not as well in the West and South Cook County suburbs, which tend to be more heavily minority and poorer (with many exceptions, of course - for every Harvey, there's an Oak Park or Tinley Park).  
Logged
muon2
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,798


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 25, 2010, 04:15:47 AM »
« Edited: October 25, 2010, 04:18:55 AM by muon2 »


Not really, because the "others" are in this as well. And Jones & Labno are getting 5 & 4%.

The body of the article says 15% undecided in Chicago, so I assume that removes the 3rd party candidates.


Seeing as the 3rd-parties are pretty Left-wing (from what I can tell), it makes sense they'd be doing much better than average in the most Liberal part of the state (like how Nader did 3-4 times better in Travis County than in texas as a whole).


The Libertarian Labno is being supported by some conservatives who can't bring themselves to vote for Kirk given his record on social issues.
Logged
Dgov
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,558
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: October 25, 2010, 04:30:29 AM »

The Libertarian Labno is being supported by some conservatives who can't bring themselves to vote for Kirk given his record on social issues.

isn't that kind of counter-intuitive?  I mean, voting for a Libertarian because you don't support the Republican's position on Abortion?
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,866
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: October 25, 2010, 05:00:12 AM »

This race reminds me somewhat the house race at Wyoming in 2006 and 2008. Till the last days the polls showed the Dem candidate tied or even ahead, but with a significant number of undecided Republicans.
In the end though they came home and the Republican candidate eventually won.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,521
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: October 25, 2010, 06:37:31 AM »

The Libertarian Labno is being supported by some conservatives who can't bring themselves to vote for Kirk given his record on social issues.

isn't that kind of counter-intuitive?  I mean, voting for a Libertarian because you don't support the Republican's position on Abortion?

I guess it depends on whether he's a Ron Paul libertarian or an actual libertarian.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.051 seconds with 13 queries.