CT: Rasmussen: McMahon falls further behind
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 04, 2024, 12:56:24 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2010 Elections
  2010 Senatorial Election Polls
  CT: Rasmussen: McMahon falls further behind
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: CT: Rasmussen: McMahon falls further behind  (Read 962 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,172
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 06, 2010, 12:25:34 PM »

New Poll: Connecticut Senator by Rasmussen on 2010-10-05

Summary: D: 54%, R: 43%, I: 0%, U: 3%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details

Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,701
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 06, 2010, 12:31:01 PM »

Pretty close to what PPP had, seems to be a consensus.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,278
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 06, 2010, 01:10:09 PM »

Fantastic.
Logged
albaleman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,212
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.77, S: -4.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 06, 2010, 01:36:17 PM »

Blumenthal will win.

The problem is, the GOP needed a better candidate to pull of a win in CT. McMahon is fairly moderate but she has enough baggage to fill up a couple of 747s. I knew it from the beginning, the GOP should have chosen Rob Simmons.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,721


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 06, 2010, 01:53:52 PM »
« Edited: October 06, 2010, 01:57:14 PM by cinyc »

Blumenthal will win.

The problem is, the GOP needed a better candidate to pull of a win in CT. McMahon is fairly moderate but she has enough baggage to fill up a couple of 747s. I knew it from the beginning, the GOP should have chosen Rob Simmons.

McMahon is the best possible Republican candidate for Connecticut.  She has the money to advertise.  Simmons simply would not have.  There's not a ton of difference between McMahon and Simmons on social issues.

This isn't over.  Blumenthal's disastrous answer to how you create jobs is generating some buzz, at least in the right-wing blogosphere.  And the McMahon campaign's ads seem to be hinting at another Blumenthal lie to be exposed.   Plus, the DSCC is pouring money into the race, suggesting Blumenthal is more vulnerable than most think.

I've always said McMahon needs another Blumenthal gaffe to have a shot at winning. It hasn't happened yet - but Blumenthal seems to be perfectly capable of it.
Logged
Whacker77
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 763


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 06, 2010, 02:27:13 PM »

Is Blumenthol the Ben Cardin of 2010?  A Democrat who wins, but doesn't engender a lot of excitement.
Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,004
Latvia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 06, 2010, 10:45:43 PM »

Isn't it interesting how Rasmussen's numbers change every time PPP offers insight into the race, even if there was no apparent movement in the first place? First they give Raese a ten point swing when PPP shows him ahead by a similar margin, now they give Blumenthal a six point swing when PPP shows him ahead by a similar margin. Is Rasmussen just fudging up their numbers to be as orgasmic as they can get away with without being dismissed as GOP hacks?
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 15, 2010, 11:42:45 AM »

Today's iteration shows a tightening - question is how much?  You'll find out soon...  Tongue
Logged
You kip if you want to...
change08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,940
United Kingdom
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 15, 2010, 02:17:10 PM »

Today's iteration shows a tightening - question is how much?  You'll find out soon...  Tongue

51-46 to Blumenthal.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.037 seconds with 15 queries.