Who is most likely to beat Obama?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 02:31:38 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Who is most likely to beat Obama?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: Who is most likely to beat Obama?  (Read 5254 times)
LBJ Revivalist
ModerateDemocrat1990
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 799


Political Matrix
E: -5.87, S: -2.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 27, 2010, 02:40:02 AM »

Who out of the pool of candidates could most likely beat Obama in 2012?
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,839
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 27, 2010, 07:54:15 AM »

Himself.

At this point re-election is his to lose.

If you want a sports analogy, it is the fourth quarter of a football game and as the quarterback of a team up by two touchdowns  and a field goal and the ball on the opponents' 30-yard line as the two-minute warning approaches he must avoid throwing an interception or handing the ball to a runner who has a tendency to fumble.

We know what the interceptions are and what the fumbles are -- scandals, international debacles, a severe economic downturn, and extreme gaffes in a political campaign.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,516
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 27, 2010, 11:34:53 AM »

^ LOL WUT
Logged
GLPman
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,160
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 27, 2010, 11:40:45 AM »

pbrower, you are absurd.

To PROPERLY answer the question, I think Daniels stands a good chance if he can get his name out there. He's an extremely successful governor and there's no doubt in my mind he'd be an effective conservative president.
Logged
You kip if you want to...
change08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,940
United Kingdom
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 27, 2010, 12:09:53 PM »

Mitt Romney, but it's not like he'll win a primary. Maybe Mitch Daniels, but again I think the GOP primary is to liable to get hi-jacked by the tea party.
Logged
LBJ Revivalist
ModerateDemocrat1990
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 799


Political Matrix
E: -5.87, S: -2.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 27, 2010, 02:22:07 PM »

personally i hope he gets beaten in 2012. I liked him at first but no more
Logged
California8429
A-Bob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,785
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 27, 2010, 10:43:45 PM »

Gingrich. Only way the GOP can beat him is to destroy him in the debates and have a candidate that can destroy the media. Seriously, it is the only way. GOP WILL be outspent, and they WILL get better media coverage.
Logged
Bull Moose Base
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,488


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: August 28, 2010, 03:20:37 AM »

personally i hope he gets beaten in 2012. I liked him at first but no more

why not?
Logged
feeblepizza
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,910
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.45, S: -0.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: August 28, 2010, 08:36:03 AM »

Mitch Daniels. He has connections in Washington and in the higher ups within the GOP from his time with Reagan and W., so he could easily get enough cash and enough support (from Indiana and other places) to become the nominee and eventually the President.
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,182
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: August 29, 2010, 01:23:54 PM »

Mitch Daniels.  He's the only non-loony who could be a serious candidate, plus he has a strong record as a two-term Governor of Indiana and has the connections that would allow him to run a well-financed campaign.
Logged
Donald Trump’s Toupée
GOP_Represent
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,579


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: August 29, 2010, 03:33:42 PM »

Romney. He is a businessman with a proven record of doing well financially. In a poor economic climate, he'll be the one to help turn around the economy. Additionally, he's no dove either when it comes to the war on terror over seas contingency plans.
Logged
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: August 30, 2010, 12:10:32 AM »

Thune.
Logged
exopolitician
MATCHU[D]
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,892
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.03, S: -6.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: August 30, 2010, 12:12:32 AM »

Daniels, though he needs to get his name out and stay away from the fact he was involved with the Bush Administration.
Logged
Poundingtherock
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 917
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: August 30, 2010, 12:12:42 AM »

Romney wanted timetables in Iraq.  So yes, he has no clue.
Logged
Inmate Trump
GWBFan
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,071


Political Matrix
E: -4.39, S: -7.30

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: August 30, 2010, 06:22:41 AM »

Whoever has the biggest wallet is who'll win the election in '012.  These things are bought; there's really no point in discussing it on any deeper level.
Logged
redcommander
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,816
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: August 31, 2010, 02:57:10 PM »


Isn't Thune a little too conservative for many voters? This is the man that led the movement to ban abortion in South Dakota.
Logged
Donald Trump’s Toupée
GOP_Represent
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,579


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: August 31, 2010, 07:46:29 PM »

Thune, Daniels, etc do not have name recognition and for this reason stand no chance.

Romney raised his political capital in 2008, avoided the nomination and thus a crushing defeat that any republican candidate would have received coming off of the Bush years.
Logged
Penelope
Scifiguy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,523
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: September 01, 2010, 07:00:41 AM »

No one.....
Logged
Dr. Cynic
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,455
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.11, S: -6.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: September 01, 2010, 06:18:56 PM »

Himself.

At this point re-election is his to lose.

If you want a sports analogy, it is the fourth quarter of a football game and as the quarterback of a team up by two touchdowns  and a field goal and the ball on the opponents' 30-yard line as the two-minute warning approaches he must avoid throwing an interception or handing the ball to a runner who has a tendency to fumble.

In that situation, the QB will take a knee to run out the clock! Don't you know anything about football?! Tongue
Logged
Dr. Cynic
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,455
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.11, S: -6.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: September 01, 2010, 06:20:22 PM »

Thune, Daniels, etc do not have name recognition and for this reason stand no chance.

Romney raised his political capital in 2008, avoided the nomination and thus a crushing defeat that any republican candidate would have received coming off of the Bush years.

Romney still looks bad as a flip flopper, mormon and a primary loser when it was his to win with all the money he threw around. It'd be better for the Republicans to take a dark horse.
Logged
ragevein
KansasDem
Rookie
**
Posts: 31


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: September 01, 2010, 06:52:18 PM »

I am a Obama suporter, but Mitt Willard Romney will defeat Barack Hussain Obama to become the first Mormom-American President-Elect of the United States.

No amount of Obama's wholesome Christian values will be enough to defeat the Dark Forces Of The Book Of Mormom.   I wouldn't be surpoiresed if Obama loses but manages to take Oklahoma (where they value the Christian values and would NO WAY vote for a Mormom in a 312-198 defeat landslide.  

Do not tell me I do not knowed what I am talking about the evils of Mormom.  I went to BYU university for a 1 semester and it was disturbing.  On the middle of the night, from one side of campus in the Heritage Halls males dorm you can hear the chanting:  "MORE men! MORE men! " and on the other side, in Helaman they went "BRING EM YOUNG!  BRING EM YOUNG"!   I was glad to be out of that extremely disturbing univesrity.  (I am Christian)
Logged
milhouse24
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,331
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: September 01, 2010, 07:14:19 PM »

I think Crist should run for President.  He'd get the evangelical, hispanic, and gay vote.

Plus he's not the anti-Crist
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: September 01, 2010, 07:20:38 PM »

I think Crist should run for President.  He'd get the evangelical, hispanic, and gay vote.

Plus he's not the anti-Crist

Crist would not win over evangelicals due to his waffling on abortion and other issues. I'm not sure how well he'd do with Latinos if he ran as a GOPer since the Republicans alienated a lot of Latinos in the last 5 years. As for gays, they are too small of a voting bloc to make a difference. And your pun isn't funny.
Logged
milhouse24
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,331
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: September 01, 2010, 07:30:56 PM »

I think Crist should run for President.  He'd get the evangelical, hispanic, and gay vote.

Plus he's not the anti-Crist

Crist would not win over evangelicals due to his waffling on abortion and other issues. I'm not sure how well he'd do with Latinos if he ran as a GOPer since the Republicans alienated a lot of Latinos in the last 5 years. As for gays, they are too small of a voting bloc to make a difference. And your pun isn't funny.
He should have a slogan "I'm Pro-Crist not Anti-Crist"
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: September 01, 2010, 07:31:56 PM »

I think Crist should run for President.  He'd get the evangelical, hispanic, and gay vote.

Plus he's not the anti-Crist

Crist would not win over evangelicals due to his waffling on abortion and other issues. I'm not sure how well he'd do with Latinos if he ran as a GOPer since the Republicans alienated a lot of Latinos in the last 5 years. As for gays, they are too small of a voting bloc to make a difference. And your pun isn't funny.
He should have a slogan "I'm Pro-Crist not Anti-Crist"

That would be an epic fail on his part and make him look really stupid.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.045 seconds with 13 queries.