NJ-03/Rutgers: Adler leads Runyan by 10

[Tender Branson]

Likely voters:

John Adler: 40%
Jon Runyan: 30%
Won't vote: 8%
Undecided: 22%

John Adler: 36%
Jon Runyan: 26%
Peter DeStefano: 4%
Won't vote: 5%
Undecided: 30%

The Rutgers-Eagleton Poll was conducted from August 5-8, 2010 with a scientifically selected random sample of 421registered voters from the 3rd Congressional District of New Jersey. Data are weighted to represent known parameters in the population, including gender, age, race, education, and Hispanic ethnicity. All results are reported with these weighted data. This telephone poll included 414 landline respondents acquired through random digit dialing, and 7 interviews of randomly selected cell phone only households.

http://eagletonpoll.rutgers.edu/polls/release_08-10-10.pdf

[Small Business Owner of Any Repute]

This sounds about right, but seeing that "Rutgers" tag after the poll makes me, you know, nervous. Eagleton's polling arm has been troubled for the better part of the last decade (though it'd be nice to see the alma mater redeem themselves).

[Bo]

From what I've read about him, Runyan is a horrible candidate and thus Adler should win here in the end. Which would be good for us, since then we could get a friendlier district for Adler after redistricting.

[Zarn]

From what I've read about him, Runyan is a horrible candidate and thus Adler should win here in the end. Which would be good for us, since then we could get a friendlier district for Adler after redistricting.

Why would Adler get a friendlier district?

[Rowan]

From what I've read about him, Runyan is a horrible candidate and thus Adler should win here in the end. Which would be good for us, since then we could get a friendlier district for Adler after redistricting.

Why would Adler get a friendlier district?

Because Rochambeau is clueless about just about everything?