Which Presidential Election was the Least Important in American history?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 08:10:26 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  Which Presidential Election was the Least Important in American history?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: Which Presidential Election was the Least Important in American history?  (Read 8999 times)
Oswald Acted Alone, You Kook
The Obamanation
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,853
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: June 17, 2010, 12:06:16 PM »

I'm gonna say 1820. Monroe wins every state, one vote for John Quincy Adams, 3 dead electors.

Besides that, 1944, 1956, and possibly 1792.
Logged
The Mikado
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,775


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: June 17, 2010, 12:58:49 PM »

In recent times, 1996.
Logged
Dancing with Myself
tb75
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,941
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: June 17, 2010, 01:05:36 PM »

1820, and 1880 for the 1800's.

1900, 1924, 1956,1996 for the 1900's

2004 for the 2000's
Logged
Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl
Libertas
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,899
Finland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: June 17, 2010, 01:09:29 PM »

2008 probably. McCain and Obama were identical, so the election really had no effect on the course the country is on.
Logged
Oswald Acted Alone, You Kook
The Obamanation
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,853
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: June 17, 2010, 01:39:31 PM »

2008 probably. McCain and Obama were identical, so the election really had no effect on the course the country is on.

Election of the first Black President = Important.

This sounds a bit more like 1996.
Logged
Psychic Octopus
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,948
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: June 17, 2010, 02:07:53 PM »

'56 and '96 weren't all that important. I guess an argument could be made against '44, too.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: June 18, 2010, 01:05:52 PM »

1944 mattered because of the war, and the probabilty that postwar Dewey would try and weaken the New Deal.  I'd say '56, '76, and '96.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: June 18, 2010, 03:12:09 PM »

1820
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: June 18, 2010, 04:19:20 PM »

2008 probably. McCain and Obama were identical, so the election really had no effect on the course the country is on.

Election of the first Black President = Important.

This sounds a bit more like 1996.

Don't confuse precedent breaking with "Important."
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: June 18, 2010, 06:43:01 PM »

2008 probably. McCain and Obama were identical, so the election really had no effect on the course the country is on.

Election of the first Black President = Important.

This sounds a bit more like 1996.

He's not black.
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: June 18, 2010, 06:50:18 PM »

2008 probably. McCain and Obama were identical, so the election really had no effect on the course the country is on.

Election of the first Black President = Important.

This sounds a bit more like 1996.

He's not black.

He's half black.
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: June 18, 2010, 06:52:14 PM »

In terms of significance, probably one in the 19th century. 1848 is a good choice, as is 1852. 1908 might be another good one, even though that's in the 20th century.
Logged
cpeeks
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 699
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: June 19, 2010, 02:08:06 AM »

easily 1792 and maybe 1804
Logged
Mechaman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,791
Jamaica
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: June 19, 2010, 09:17:28 AM »

2008 probably. McCain and Obama were identical, so the election really had no effect on the course the country is on.

Election of the first Black President = Important.

This sounds a bit more like 1996.

Don't confuse precedent breaking with "Important."

Exactly.
This is like claiming that the Election of 1828 (though important for other reasons) was one of the most important in history because it was the election of the first president of Irish descent.  Or that 1836 was a very important election because it was the election of our first president of Dutch descent.  Or that 1960 (though important for other reasons) was one of the most important in history because it was the election of our first Roman Catholic president.  Oh let's go ahead and throw in 1980 (important for other reasons as well) because Ronnie Reagan happended to be the first divorced president in this nation's history.
Sometimes precedence is meaningless.  2008 didn't prove that America has moved past racism, if anything it proved that America is still chock full of racists, from both the left and the right.
Logged
Thomas D
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,043
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.84, S: -6.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: June 19, 2010, 09:42:10 AM »

1956,1976,1996. So I'm guessing 2016 won't be important either.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: June 19, 2010, 11:59:43 AM »

76 wasn't important?
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: June 20, 2010, 01:04:52 PM »
« Edited: June 20, 2010, 03:35:51 PM by True Federalist »


Carter and Ford were pretty similar on the issues, so back then it didn't really appear to matter who would have won.

Back in the day, many people said 2000 wasn't very important because "Gore and Bush were too similar." Turned out that was just a bunch of crap.

Combined adjacent posts on same topic in which the second was posted immediately after.
Logged
Zostrum
Newbie
*
Posts: 7


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: June 20, 2010, 09:39:25 PM »

I'm gonna say 1820. Monroe wins every state, one vote for John Quincy Adams, 3 dead electors.

Agreed, there wasn't even a second party, so was it really even that much of an election? It was more of a ceremonial procedure rather than a true election.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,743


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: June 29, 2010, 01:30:08 AM »

I'd go with 1956 for the last century.
Logged
GLPman
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,160
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: July 01, 2010, 09:58:12 PM »

In the past 50 years, probably 1996.
Logged
Derek
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,615
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: July 02, 2010, 12:18:07 AM »

2008
Logged
Magic 8-Ball
mrk
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,674
Czech Republic


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: July 02, 2010, 01:53:24 AM »

1996
Logged
#CriminalizeSobriety
Dallasfan65
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,859


Political Matrix
E: 5.48, S: -9.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: July 08, 2010, 05:54:41 PM »

1960.
Logged
Oswald Acted Alone, You Kook
The Obamanation
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,853
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: July 08, 2010, 11:40:28 PM »
« Edited: July 09, 2010, 12:11:21 AM by That Guy »


No. The first election where looks made the winner, in addition to said winner being incredibly popular and the most beloved president of the past 50 years (except mabye Ronald Reagan) is important.
Logged
#CriminalizeSobriety
Dallasfan65
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,859


Political Matrix
E: 5.48, S: -9.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: July 09, 2010, 12:36:21 AM »


No. The first election where looks made the winner, in addition to said winner being incredibly popular and the most beloved president of the past 50 years (except mabye Ronald Reagan) is important.

I highly doubt a Nixon Presidency would've been that different from a Kennedy Presidency - not to mention JFK is only loved so much because of his image.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.052 seconds with 12 queries.