TX: 1948 Senatorial Democratic Runoff Election Result
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 06:47:26 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  TX: 1948 Senatorial Democratic Runoff Election Result
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: TX: 1948 Senatorial Democratic Runoff Election Result  (Read 3399 times)
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,825


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 19, 2010, 04:03:57 PM »

New Election: 1948 Texas Senatorial Democratic Runoff Election Results
   
   

Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,411
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 19, 2010, 04:09:13 PM »
« Edited: May 19, 2010, 04:11:05 PM by Orleanser »

I know this isn't related to the matter at hand, but what's with that old Democratic stronghold in West Texas? It lasted for quite a while, but now it's like the most Republican area in the country. McGovern won one county in that area, and it voted 72% for McCain.

eg;

Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,107
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 19, 2010, 04:11:20 PM »

Stevenson carried Houston and Dallas but Johnson prevailed. Interesting.

And wasn't Johnson the Liberal choice?
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,900
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 19, 2010, 04:13:58 PM »

We've had questions on this subject before. I think it was something to do with who settled the area and it being very remote and thinly populated.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 19, 2010, 04:21:06 PM »

So why did LBJ perform so horribly in Gillespie County (where he was born).  He performed fine in Blanco County, where he grew up.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,101
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: May 19, 2010, 04:25:03 PM »

So why did LBJ perform so horribly in Gillespie County (where he was born).  He performed fine in Blanco County, where he grew up.

Gilliepie County is very conservative as you know, in the German hill country, and Blanco isn't, or wasn't, so much. And back then as you know, most folks voted in the Dem primary, and there were shoot outs between the "progressive" and Tory wings of the party, and LBJ was the "progressive."
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,900
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: May 19, 2010, 04:39:40 PM »

The strange part there though is how well (for a Democrat) LBJ did there later on. Though that might have been more a 'boy done well' vote as owt else.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,825


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: May 19, 2010, 09:18:03 PM »

If you don't know about this election, I suggest that you, at the very least, read this article.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: May 19, 2010, 09:32:47 PM »

So why did LBJ perform so horribly in Gillespie County (where he was born).  He performed fine in Blanco County, where he grew up.

Gilliepie County is very conservative as you know, in the German hill country, and Blanco isn't, or wasn't, so much. And back then as you know, most folks voted in the Dem primary, and there were shoot outs between the "progressive" and Tory wings of the party, and LBJ was the "progressive."

Well, Blanco County is certainly in the Hill Country, so that really doesn't matter.  Also, this is before the fight between the progressives and conservatives - that's the 1950s.

I think the key difference is that Gillespie County was uniformly German (and Republican) at that time (it still is, really), whereas Blanco has a lot more English types and less Germans.  Which is odd, because I knew plenty of Germans in Blanco (but that was towards the western part of the county.
Logged
The Mikado
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,875


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: May 19, 2010, 09:39:55 PM »

Never seen a map of this race before, thanks.

This race is one of my favorite stories.  Fascinating stuff.  The "Landslide Lyndon" stuff is driven home when you see that the margin was 50.00% to 50.00%.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,101
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: May 19, 2010, 10:02:24 PM »

So why did LBJ perform so horribly in Gillespie County (where he was born).  He performed fine in Blanco County, where he grew up.

Gilliepie County is very conservative as you know, in the German hill country, and Blanco isn't, or wasn't, so much. And back then as you know, most folks voted in the Dem primary, and there were shoot outs between the "progressive" and Tory wings of the party, and LBJ was the "progressive."


Well, Blanco County is certainly in the Hill Country, so that really doesn't matter.  Also, this is before the fight between the progressives and conservatives - that's the 1950s.

I think the key difference is that Gillespie County was uniformly German (and Republican) at that time (it still is, really), whereas Blanco has a lot more English types and less Germans.  Which is odd, because I knew plenty of Germans in Blanco (but that was towards the western part of the county.

Yes, that is why I said Gillespie County was more "conservative."  I didn't say "Republican" (because they were a pro Union island in a rebel sea), because we were talking about a Dem primary. Smiley
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,101
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: May 19, 2010, 10:06:49 PM »
« Edited: May 19, 2010, 10:39:41 PM by Torie »

Never seen a map of this race before, thanks.

This race is one of my favorite stories.  Fascinating stuff.  The "Landslide Lyndon" stuff is driven home when you see that the margin was 50.00% to 50.00%.

If you have not read Caro's book on this period of LBJ's career, you should. It is a very engrossing read, and covers the stuffed ballot box affair in Duval County (Caro actually interviewed the guy who stuffed the box). The radio station affair is also fascinating (which after LBJ essentially stole it pulling strings with the FCC in DC, he then used it to funnel bribes to himself via corporations buying ad time on the radio station). You will never think of LBJ the same way again.
Logged
Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl
Libertas
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,899
Finland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: May 19, 2010, 10:08:23 PM »

Never seen a map of this race before, thanks.

This race is one of my favorite stories.  Fascinating stuff.  The "Landslide Lyndon" stuff is driven home when you see that the margin was 50.00% to 50.00%.

If you have not read Caro's book on this period of LBJ's career, you should. It is a very engrossing read, and covers the stuffed ballot box affair in Duval County (Caro actually interviewed the guy who stuffed the box). The radio station affair is also fascinating (which after LBJ essentially stole it pulling strings with the FCC in DC, he then used to funnel bribes to himself via corporations buying ad time on the radio station). You will never think of LBJ the same way again.

Do you like LBJ?
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,101
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: May 19, 2010, 10:38:13 PM »

Regarding my opinion of LBJ, I rank him as the worst President in US history, and that aside, probably the one who got away with more felonies without anyone laying a glove on him. But yes, Libertas, I did favor the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the Voting Rights Act. Smiley
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: May 19, 2010, 10:55:15 PM »

Neat map, though I notice you accidentally have Stevenson as a Republican.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,825


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: May 19, 2010, 11:29:51 PM »

Neat map, though I notice you accidentally have Stevenson as a Republican.

Sorry, I forgot to change that when I uploaded the results. It's fixed now.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,708
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: May 20, 2010, 12:04:53 AM »

I've always wanted to see a map of this race.

This interests me:



It's clear that the red is larger than the blue, but the margin of the election was so close that the difference shouldn't be visible on a pie chart of that size.
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: May 20, 2010, 12:10:04 AM »

Why did LBJ do extraordinarily well among Latino voters? Because he was more liberal?
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,708
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: May 20, 2010, 12:15:17 AM »
« Edited: May 20, 2010, 12:17:49 AM by Хahar »

Would you be able to put the first round map up?

Why did LBJ do extraordinarily well among Latino voters? Because he was more liberal?

He paid their leaders.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: May 20, 2010, 12:25:33 AM »

For you what-if timeliners, Stevenson defeats Johnson would be an interesting shift in American history.
Logged
The Mikado
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,875


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: May 20, 2010, 08:54:05 AM »

Why did LBJ do extraordinarily well among Latino voters? Because he was more liberal?

Roll Eyes

In before Sam Spade guts this kid.
Logged
jimrtex
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,817
Marshall Islands


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: May 21, 2010, 01:20:50 PM »

So why did LBJ perform so horribly in Gillespie County (where he was born).  He performed fine in Blanco County, where he grew up.

Stevenson was from Kimble County.  When he was a teenager he started his own freighting company (by wagon) and was self-educated reading by his campfire light.
Logged
jimrtex
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,817
Marshall Islands


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: May 21, 2010, 01:54:52 PM »

Why did LBJ do extraordinarily well among Latino voters? Because he was more liberal?
Stevenson was extremely honest, and he refused to appoint a particular corrupt DA in Laredo.

POLITICAL NOTES: The Duke Delivers
Logged
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: May 22, 2010, 02:05:59 AM »

Interesting. Johnson certainly seems to have done best in what would later become the traditionally Democratic portions of the state, and Stevenson in the Republican portions.

Worth noting, of course, that machine politics was the rule rather than the exception back in the day, and Stevenson certainly benefited from fraud as well. In an election that close in that era, trying to determine the true winner is an exercise in futility.

Not that it excuses what happened in south Texas, but just saying.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,101
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: May 22, 2010, 08:06:19 AM »

Interesting. Johnson certainly seems to have done best in what would later become the traditionally Democratic portions of the state, and Stevenson in the Republican portions.

Worth noting, of course, that machine politics was the rule rather than the exception back in the day, and Stevenson certainly benefited from fraud as well. In an election that close in that era, trying to determine the true winner is an exercise in futility.

Not that it excuses what happened in south Texas, but just saying.

One difference is that any fraud committed in Stevenson's behalf was not orchestrated by him. LBJ was the conductor on the ballot box stuffing affair. He filled the role of Nixon in ballotgate.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.048 seconds with 9 queries.