WA: Elway poll: Murray blowsaway Rossi
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 04, 2024, 03:11:34 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2010 Elections
  2010 Senatorial Election Polls
  WA: Elway poll: Murray blowsaway Rossi
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: WA: Elway poll: Murray blowsaway Rossi  (Read 360 times)
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,870
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 05, 2010, 06:33:12 PM »

http://www.scribd.com/doc/30944176/Elway-PollonMurrayre-elect050510-1#fullscreen:on
D:51-R:34
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,719


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 05, 2010, 06:45:08 PM »

Who? John Elway's polling Washington now?

This was a registration-based sample.  The 51%-34% figure assumes 100% turnout of all registered voters polled.  That's never going to happen.    If the turnout is a uniform 60% - those who voted in 3 of the last 4 elections, Murray's lead is 10.  If turnout is a uniform 40% - just perfect voters who voted in 4 of the last 4 elections, Murray's lead is down to 9.  It doesn't take into account which of the 20% are more likely to vote in the election.
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 05, 2010, 06:47:24 PM »

Wow, Rossi +10 and now Murray +17?

lolz, lots of garbage polling for WA lately. Though if you combine the two and say Murray +7, that doesn't sound too ridiculous. Wink
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 13 queries.