What if Harry Browne, Pat Buchanan, wasn't in the election, but Nader still was?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 01:45:35 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results
  2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  What if Harry Browne, Pat Buchanan, wasn't in the election, but Nader still was?		 « previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: What if Harry Browne, Pat Buchanan, wasn't in the election, but Nader still was?  (Read 1533 times)
21st Century Independent
Rookie
**
Posts: 120


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 04, 2010, 06:32:25 AM »
Is it possible that if Harry Browne, nor Pat Buchanan hadn't been in the election that those libertarians and reformists would have gone Bush instead?

If so, this would have been the EV total and Map.



Bush 301
Gore 237
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 04, 2010, 07:17:27 AM »
No Browne just means some other Libertarian gets .5% of the vote.  No Buchanan probably sends those votes to the Libertarian.

I'd be willing to argue the vast majority of the Browne, Buchanan, and Nader supporters would not have voted.  BUT, I think the ~500 margin in Florida would have been made up by Gore by those who still did.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 12 queries.