1980 Presidential Election Closer?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 02:26:32 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  1980 Presidential Election Closer?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 1980 Presidential Election Closer?  (Read 5741 times)
JerryBrown2010
KyleGordon2016
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 712
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.68, S: -9.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 21, 2010, 12:10:35 AM »

Was the 1980 Presidential Election expected to be closer than it was? I found this picture showing Reagan with a 3 point lead over Carter in November.


Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 21, 2010, 12:19:36 AM »

Yes, it was expected to be closer until Reagan asked voters if they were better off than there were four years ago. That opened a large lead for Reagan right before election day according to some polls (not shown on this chart).
Logged
redcommander
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,816
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: March 21, 2010, 12:36:29 AM »

62% for Carter in January! That seems a little off especially considering the economic situation at the time.
Logged
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: March 21, 2010, 11:35:56 AM »

62% for Carter in January! That seems a little off especially considering the economic situation at the time.

The hostages in Iran had just recently been taken so there was a "rally around the flag" effect.
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: March 21, 2010, 03:58:58 PM »

62% for Carter in January! That seems a little off especially considering the economic situation at the time.

The hostages in Iran had just recently been taken so there was a "rally around the flag" effect.

This, combined with the fact that unemployment was 6.3% in January but 7.5% in November.

http://data.bls.gov/PDQ/servlet/SurveyOutputServlet
Logged
Sasquatch
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,077


Political Matrix
E: -8.13, S: -8.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: March 22, 2010, 07:30:22 PM »
« Edited: March 22, 2010, 10:05:48 PM by Sasquatch »

Was the 1980 Presidential Election expected to be closer than it was? I found this picture showing Reagan with a 3 point lead over Carter in November.





This is what that November poll would have looked like if that was the case IRL.



Reagan - 47% (-4)  308
Carter -   44% (+3)  230
Anderson - 8% (+1)
Logged
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,030
Czech Republic


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: March 22, 2010, 08:05:12 PM »

Definitely. As Rochambeau said earlier, Reagan's landslide victory is probably mostly due to the Carter-Reagan debate. Before that it was a tossup and I think Carter even led in some polls. But in that debate (the only time Carter and Reagan engaged in a debate), that one quote turned the race from a tossup to a decisive Reagan lead instantly, and it soon ended up a 10 point lead in the popular vote (Reagan won 41-51).
Logged
Lahbas
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 568
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: March 23, 2010, 05:55:07 AM »

More curiously, what would have a June poll looked like, with Anderson still at his peak, but Reagan ahead of Carter.
Logged
Sasquatch
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,077


Political Matrix
E: -8.13, S: -8.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: March 23, 2010, 10:42:58 AM »
« Edited: March 23, 2010, 12:37:16 PM by Sasquatch »

More curiously, what would have a June poll looked like, with Anderson still at his peak, but Reagan ahead of Carter.
Take the map I posted above and switch LA, MI, and VT.


Anderson comes in second place in a few plains states.
Logged
Lahbas
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 568
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: March 23, 2010, 03:25:19 PM »

More curiously, what would have a June poll looked like, with Anderson still at his peak, but Reagan ahead of Carter.
Take the map I posted above and switch LA, MI, and VT.


Anderson comes in second place in a few plains states.

My take on that election, using number calculations. Anderson does well, but he does not throw the election into the House.



Reagan: 350
Carter: 147
Anderson: 41
Logged
Lahbas
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 568
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: March 23, 2010, 04:06:55 PM »

Of course, if the election had been held back in January, the map could have become something like this....



Carter: 503
Reagan: 35
Logged
You kip if you want to...
change08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,940
United Kingdom
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: March 23, 2010, 04:12:09 PM »

Of course, if the election had been held back in January, the map could have become something like this....



Carter: 503
Reagan: 35

That's probably a bit generous to Reagan on a 30-point lead.
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: March 23, 2010, 04:51:12 PM »

KyleGordon, where specifically did you find this poll?
Logged
hcallega
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,523
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.10, S: -3.90

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: March 23, 2010, 07:25:52 PM »


Ronald Reagan (R) 38%. 311
Jimmy Carter (D) 36%, 227
John Anderson (I) 26%

States with Anderson in Second: Alaska, Arizona, D.C., Idaho, Massachusetts, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Utah, Vermont, Wyoming
States with Carter in Third: Alaska, Arizona, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Dakota, South Dakota, Carter, Vermont, Wyoming
States with Reagan in Third: D.C., Massachusetts, Rhode Island

Reagan is hurt by Anderson significantly, but not enough to loose what is still a tough loss for Carter. Anderson wins a strange coalition of New England Republicans who are not as conservative as Reagan and Western Democrats unhappy with Carter.

Logged
Reaganfan
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,236
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: March 24, 2010, 06:58:02 PM »

Yes, newscasters and pundits and even the Reagan's themselves were expecting a long night, and even the possibility of Carter being re-elected.
Logged
21st Century Independent
Rookie
**
Posts: 120


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: March 25, 2010, 03:29:25 AM »

Yes, newscasters and pundits and even the Reagan's themselves were expecting a long night, and even the possibility of Carter being re-elected.

The results showed that when voters stepped into the booth, many Anderson voters switched to Reagan. Blue dogs for Reagan too.
Logged
SingingAnalyst
mathstatman
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,637
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: May 05, 2015, 01:45:18 PM »

Carter lost several states by 2% or less, including 3 states with 32 EVs by 0.6% or less. Here is the map if all these states are awarded to Carter:

Reagan 399
Carter 139
Still a rout for Reagan, but a more respectable looking one for Carter.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.057 seconds with 12 queries.