1944: Wendell Wilkie vs. Henry Wallace
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 03:43:52 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  1944: Wendell Wilkie vs. Henry Wallace
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 1944: Wendell Wilkie vs. Henry Wallace  (Read 994 times)
Dancing with Myself
tb75
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,941
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 19, 2010, 07:18:35 PM »

Wendell Wilkie is elected in 1940, and basically the same events that happens to Roosevelt happens to him.  For his VP, he chooses Thomas Dewey.

The Democrats nominate 1940 VP Nominee Henry Wallace with FDR's endorsement. He picks Harry Truman as VP choice. Explain with Maps.
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 19, 2010, 07:23:11 PM »



Now could you please respond to my 1940 scenario?
Logged
Dancing with Myself
tb75
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,941
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: March 19, 2010, 07:26:38 PM »



Now could you please respond to my 1940 scenario?

Explain your answer first
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: March 19, 2010, 07:30:54 PM »


All right.

Wilkie receives enormous popularity due to the success of WWII, thus guaranteeing him victories in the North and West. Wallace's pro-civil rights positions causes the South to vote for either a third party or unpledged electors, and many voters throughout the country are also alienated by Wallace being very pro-Soviet and by Wallace's "Dear Guru" eltters. Thus Wallace fails to win even a single state.
Logged
Dancing with Myself
tb75
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,941
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: March 19, 2010, 07:34:14 PM »


All right.

Wilkie receives enormous popularity due to the success of WWII, thus guaranteeing him victories in the North and West. Wallace's pro-civil rights positions causes the South to vote for either a third party or unpledged electors, and many voters throughout the country are also alienated by Wallace being very pro-Soviet and by Wallace's "Dear Guru" eltters. Thus Wallace fails to win even a single state.

who would the third party candidate be?
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: March 19, 2010, 07:35:58 PM »


All right.

Wilkie receives enormous popularity due to the success of WWII, thus guaranteeing him victories in the North and West. Wallace's pro-civil rights positions causes the South to vote for either a third party or unpledged electors, and many voters throughout the country are also alienated by Wallace being very pro-Soviet and by Wallace's "Dear Guru" eltters. Thus Wallace fails to win even a single state.

who would the third party candidate be?

Some Southerner (Strom Thurmond, maybe). Also, the Southern states could just vote for unpledged electors and then those electors could decide for whom to vote for later.
Logged
Dancing with Myself
tb75
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,941
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: March 19, 2010, 07:37:15 PM »

A Nomination of Wallace would be a disaster for the dems.
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: March 19, 2010, 07:38:31 PM »

A Nomination of Wallace would be a disaster for the dems.

Exactly. That's why FDR dropped him from the ticket in 1944.
Logged
Cassius Dio
Mel
Rookie
**
Posts: 110
Netherlands


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: March 19, 2010, 08:55:14 PM »

I will post this map just for fun..this scenario is more than unlickly (Wilkie died before Election Day, and the Democrats would never ever give the normination to someone like Wallace)

Logged
Dancing with Myself
tb75
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,941
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: March 19, 2010, 08:56:10 PM »

I forgot to mention that in this TL Wilie is still alive.
Logged
Lahbas
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 568
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: March 22, 2010, 12:42:49 PM »

A Nomination of Wallace would be a disaster for the dems.

Exactly. That's why FDR dropped him from the ticket in 1944.
That statement is false. FDR wanted to keep Wallace on the ticket, but was forced to drop him by more moderate Democrats, who were worried about FDR's ever declining health, in favor of Harry Truman, in order to "preserve the Democratic Party's unity."
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 12 queries.