When did the Vice Presidency become an important position?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 06, 2024, 04:38:22 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  When did the Vice Presidency become an important position?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: When did the Vice Presidency become an important position?  (Read 2090 times)
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 27, 2010, 07:56:26 PM »

.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,708
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 27, 2010, 08:44:37 PM »

When Nixon made it one. Rockefeller, Mondale and Cheney are the only Vice Presidents with significant policy roles, however.
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 27, 2010, 09:13:08 PM »

I thought Barkley (under Truman) was the first one to have signficiant influence. I believe he was the first one to be invited to all Cabinet meetings. Before Truman, though, the VP spot wasn't "worth a bucket of warm piss" though.
Logged
President Mitt
Giovanni
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,347
Samoa


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 27, 2010, 09:37:46 PM »

Hot (Normal)
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 27, 2010, 09:46:36 PM »


Wrong thread.
Logged
Dancing with Myself
tb75
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,941
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 27, 2010, 09:49:47 PM »

The first Real Vp to be involved since John Adams was Wilson's VP, Thomas Marshall.
Logged
Psychic Octopus
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,948
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 27, 2010, 10:54:33 PM »

The first Real Vp to be involved since John Adams was Wilson's VP, Thomas Marshall.

Interesting that you should say that. From what I've read on Wilson's administration, Marshall was kept in the dark a lot of the time (Marshall never knew the full extent of Wilson's trauma). An ideological rift developed within the two men, which let Wilson to give him a fractional note of influence. Wilson also didn't care for the man's humor.

However, he was the first VP to chair cabinet meetings, so that could be an increase of influence.

For me, I don't consider the Vice Presidency significant, really. You can say Cheney was very active, as were Mondale and Nixon to an extent, but Biden doesn't seem to have much of a role other then matters relative to Iraq.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,708
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 28, 2010, 12:58:22 AM »

Barkley had no influence at all. He wasn't kept in the dark the way prior Vice Presidents were (because of Truman's experiences), but he was very much a Biden-type figure. He only got the nomination because no other Democrat would take it.

Marshall had even less of a role than Vice Presidents before him, as they were the administration's liaison with Congress, a role Wilson disposed with.
Logged
Psychic Octopus
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,948
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: February 28, 2010, 01:48:06 AM »

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.

http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/288255
Logged
k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,753
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: February 28, 2010, 11:05:38 AM »

I thought Barkley (under Truman) was the first one to have signficiant influence. I believe he was the first one to be invited to all Cabinet meetings. Before Truman, though, the VP spot wasn't "worth a bucket of warm piss" though.

Hehe, Nance Garner.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: February 28, 2010, 11:26:55 AM »

He only got the nomination because no other Democrat would take it.

Humphrey wanted it.
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: February 28, 2010, 12:17:54 PM »

He only got the nomination because no other Democrat would take it.

Humphrey wanted it.

Back in 1948? He was too inexperienced and unknown.
Logged
LBJ Revivalist
ModerateDemocrat1990
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 799


Political Matrix
E: -5.87, S: -2.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: February 28, 2010, 02:20:04 PM »

When Nixon made it one. Rockefeller, Mondale and Cheney are the only Vice Presidents with significant policy roles, however.

Rockefeller really didn't have that big of a policy role; He was promised to and had titles but the de facto power in that regard was usurped by Rumsfeld, at least in the books I've read. Rummy and Rockefeller hated each other.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: February 28, 2010, 02:31:45 PM »

Back in 1948? He was too inexperienced and unknown.

He wanted to do what FDR did in 1920 - be VP to gain national exposure.
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: February 28, 2010, 02:39:22 PM »

When Nixon made it one. Rockefeller, Mondale and Cheney are the only Vice Presidents with significant policy roles, however.

Guess you forgot Gore.

Also, Nixon made V.P. highly viable position, but have a limited to no power in Ike administration. Yet true, he transformed the office.
Logged
milhouse24
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,331
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: February 28, 2010, 03:15:00 PM »

I personally think that the primary goal of the VP is to help get elected.  That is he or she is media-PR figure who helps win voters. 

Of course they can take on whatever administrative or consulting role that the President gives him.  It can be a position with a lot of freedom, but none of the responsibilities.
Logged
Dancing with Myself
tb75
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,941
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: February 28, 2010, 03:17:43 PM »

The first Real Vp to be involved since John Adams was Wilson's VP, Thomas Marshall.

Interesting that you should say that. From what I've read on Wilson's administration, Marshall was kept in the dark a lot of the time (Marshall never knew the full extent of Wilson's trauma). An ideological rift developed within the two men, which let Wilson to give him a fractional note of influence. Wilson also didn't care for the man's humor.

However, he was the first VP to chair cabinet meetings, so that could be an increase of influence.

For me, I don't consider the Vice Presidency significant, really. You can say Cheney was very active, as were Mondale and Nixon to an extent, but Biden doesn't seem to have much of a role other then matters relative to Iraq.

It's a shame too because Marshall would have been as good President.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,708
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: March 01, 2010, 01:06:58 AM »

He only got the nomination because no other Democrat would take it.

Humphrey wanted it.

By no other, I meant nobody who wasn't a Mayor.
Logged
Vepres
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,032
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: March 01, 2010, 01:14:31 AM »

I personally think that the primary goal of the VP is to help get elected.  That is he or she is media-PR figure who helps win voters. 

Of course they can take on whatever administrative or consulting role that the President gives him.  It can be a position with a lot of freedom, but none of the responsibilities.

They're just a senior adviser with a far higher profile, at least in the past few administrations.
Logged
LastMcGovernite
Ringorules
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 828
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: March 23, 2010, 08:50:18 AM »

The general consensus is in the ballpark here.  Nixon made the job a symbolically important one...the foreign visits, etc. ratcheted up considerably.  Mondale was the first Veep to have a real say in shaping policy.  As bad as Carter's relationship with Congress was, it would have been much, much worse if he didn't have an experienced hand like Mondale running interference for him.  Gore further improved its influence, and was Clinton's point-man on foreign policy-- witness his advocating for involvement in Bosnia.  Cheney went further still.  While depictions of his machinations can be exaggerated, he attained a level of influence over policy that no vice president will likely attain again.

Biden, no less than Obama, is in the awkward position of having to reshape the office he is in, and shed its imperial trappings without forfeiting political efficacy- a tough task if ever there was one. 
Logged
big bad fab
filliatre
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,344
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: March 24, 2010, 06:48:47 AM »

Strictly speaking, never.

The Vice Presidency isn't an important position.

When he has to replace the President, the VP becomes important during one second, of course.
And some VP were important figures (Cheney was even a sort of co-president).
Biden shows us that it's highly different from one term to another...
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.048 seconds with 12 queries.