The Liberty Caucus

[tmthforu94]

Ballot

Chairman

[ ] Giovanni
[ x ] Dallasfan65
[ ] Mechaman
[ ] NOTA (Chuck Norris aka Freedom aka Jbrase)

Vice-Chairman

[ x ]Giovanni
[ ] NOTA (Chuck Norris aka Freedom aka Jbrase)

Voting will continue for 48 hours. Note that a vote for NOTA is not a vote for Jbrase (it's simply a gag.)

[Sewer]

Chairman

[1] Mechaman
[2] Giovanni


Vice-Chairman

[1] Giovanni

[Daniel Adams]

Ballot

Chairman

[ ] Giovanni
[X] Dallasfan65
[ ] Mechaman
[ ] NOTA (Chuck Norris aka Freedom aka Jbrase)

Vice-Chairman

[X]Giovanni
[ ] NOTA (Chuck Norris aka Freedom aka Jbrase)

[CatoMinor]

Ballot

Chairman

[ ] Giovanni
[1] Dallasfan65
[ ] Mechaman
[2] NOTA (Chuck Norris aka Freedom aka Jbrase)

Vice-Chairman

[1]Giovanni
[2] NOTA (Chuck Norris aka Freedom aka Jbrase)

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

Ballot

Chairman

[ ] Giovanni
[ x ] Dallasfan65
[ ] Mechaman
[ ] NOTA (Chuck Norris aka Freedom aka Jbrase)

Vice-Chairman

[ x ]Giovanni
[ ] NOTA (Chuck Norris aka Freedom aka Jbrase)

Voting will continue for 48 hours. Note that a vote for NOTA is not a vote for Jbrase (it's simply a gag.)

[California8429]

Registration

Dallasfan65
Jbrase
PiT (The Physicist)
SvenssonRS
SPC (South Park Conservative)
BrandonH
Giovanni
NiK
Libertas
Mechaman
Winston D'israeli
Daniel Adams
shua
Segwaystyle2012
hantheguitarman
FallenMorgan
A-Bob
Einzige
Tmthforu94
(will simply be edited as more join)

is this considered a political party, or just a caucus?

[The Age Wave]

Am I welcome?

[CatoMinor]

Registration

Dallasfan65
Jbrase
PiT (The Physicist)
SvenssonRS
SPC (South Park Conservative)
BrandonH
Giovanni
NiK
Libertas
Mechaman
Winston D'israeli
Daniel Adams
shua
Segwaystyle2012
hantheguitarman
FallenMorgan
A-Bob
Einzige
Tmthforu94
(will simply be edited as more join)

is this considered a political party, or just a caucus?

Just a cuacus, cooler version of the progressive caucus.

[Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey]

Ballot

Chairman

[ ] Giovanni
[ X] Dallasfan65
[ ] Mechaman
[ ] NOTA (Chuck Norris aka Freedom aka Jbrase)

Vice-Chairman

[X ]Giovanni
[ ] NOTA (Chuck Norris aka Freedom aka Jbrase)

Voting will continue for 48 hours. Note that a vote for NOTA is not a vote for Jbrase (it's simply a gag.)

[The Age Wave]

Am I welcome?

Guess I am

Chairman

• Dallasfan65

Vice-Chairman

• Giovanni

[#CriminalizeSobriety]

liberty caucus my ass

Weren't you on mod review?

[Psychic Octopus]

Chairman

Dallasfan

Vice Chairman

Giovanni

[Mechaman]

Ballot

Chairman

[ ] Giovanni
[ X] Dallasfan65
[ ] Mechaman
[ ] NOTA (Chuck Norris aka Freedom aka Jbrase)

Vice-Chairman

[X ]Giovanni
[ ] NOTA (Chuck Norris aka Freedom aka Jbrase)

That's right.

[Brandon H]

Chairman
Dallasfan

Vice Chairman
Giovanni

[Associate Justice PiT]

Chairman:
Mechaman

Vice Chairman:
Giovanni

[SPC]

Chairman:
Mechaman

Vice Chairman:
Giovanni

[Scam of God]

Okay, I'll join. Though I have to disagree with you on some social issues, I do agree with a large part of your message.

Why? Didn't you vote against the Reasonable Military Funding Act? Aren't you generally a populist, our political opposite? I hate to propose a litmus test - I think we ought to go out of our way to attract members of the libertarian left - but you definitely seem out of place.

I certainly hope this isn't going to become a doctrinaire "libertarian left" outfit. That's not what I understood from the introductory post. 

Ah, you mean there aren't a thousand-and-one other generically orthodox right-"libertarian" factions for you to join?

But no matter. We don't seek to tear your monopoly of libertarian rhetoric from your hands, but merely to challenge it. Hence I will be forming a sub-caucus faction ala Labour Left/Right, together with Govanni, Mechaman, SewerSocialist, and all other comers. We will be making policy recommendations from our perspective for your perusal.

[SvenssonRS]

Well, since my first vote mysteriously disappeared, let's try this again.

Chairman:

• Dallasfan65

Vice Chairman:

• Giovanni

[The Age Wave]

Okay, I'll join. Though I have to disagree with you on some social issues, I do agree with a large part of your message.

Why? Didn't you vote against the Reasonable Military Funding Act? Aren't you generally a populist, our political opposite? I hate to propose a litmus test - I think we ought to go out of our way to attract members of the libertarian left - but you definitely seem out of place.

I certainly hope this isn't going to become a doctrinaire "libertarian left" outfit. That's not what I understood from the introductory post. 

Ah, you mean there aren't a thousand-and-one other generically orthodox right-"libertarian" factions for you to join?

But no matter. We don't seek to tear your monopoly of libertarian rhetoric from your hands, but merely to challenge it. Hence I will be forming a sub-caucus faction ala Labour Left/Right, together with Govanni, Mechaman, SewerSocialist, and all other comers. We will be making policy recommendations from our perspective for your perusal.

Sounds a bit divisive.

[Scam of God]

Okay, I'll join. Though I have to disagree with you on some social issues, I do agree with a large part of your message.

Why? Didn't you vote against the Reasonable Military Funding Act? Aren't you generally a populist, our political opposite? I hate to propose a litmus test - I think we ought to go out of our way to attract members of the libertarian left - but you definitely seem out of place.

I certainly hope this isn't going to become a doctrinaire "libertarian left" outfit. That's not what I understood from the introductory post. 

Ah, you mean there aren't a thousand-and-one other generically orthodox right-"libertarian" factions for you to join?

But no matter. We don't seek to tear your monopoly of libertarian rhetoric from your hands, but merely to challenge it. Hence I will be forming a sub-caucus faction ala Labour Left/Right, together with Govanni, Mechaman, SewerSocialist, and all other comers. We will be making policy recommendations from our perspective for your perusal.

Sounds a bit divisive.

That's quite the point. For far too long the Misean disciples have stunted and stifled anarchist expressions of policy preference by denying to them space in the public discourse to voice those preferences. No longer.

[#CriminalizeSobriety]

Okay, I'll join. Though I have to disagree with you on some social issues, I do agree with a large part of your message.

Why? Didn't you vote against the Reasonable Military Funding Act? Aren't you generally a populist, our political opposite? I hate to propose a litmus test - I think we ought to go out of our way to attract members of the libertarian left - but you definitely seem out of place.

I certainly hope this isn't going to become a doctrinaire "libertarian left" outfit. That's not what I understood from the introductory post. 

Ah, you mean there aren't a thousand-and-one other generically orthodox right-"libertarian" factions for you to join?

But no matter. We don't seek to tear your monopoly of libertarian rhetoric from your hands, but merely to challenge it. Hence I will be forming a sub-caucus faction ala Labour Left/Right, together with Govanni, Mechaman, SewerSocialist, and all other comers. We will be making policy recommendations from our perspective for your perusal.

Sounds a bit divisive.

The dialogue would be healthy for the Caucus.

[Mechaman]

Okay, I'll join. Though I have to disagree with you on some social issues, I do agree with a large part of your message.

Why? Didn't you vote against the Reasonable Military Funding Act? Aren't you generally a populist, our political opposite? I hate to propose a litmus test - I think we ought to go out of our way to attract members of the libertarian left - but you definitely seem out of place.

I certainly hope this isn't going to become a doctrinaire "libertarian left" outfit. That's not what I understood from the introductory post. 

Ah, you mean there aren't a thousand-and-one other generically orthodox right-"libertarian" factions for you to join?

But no matter. We don't seek to tear your monopoly of libertarian rhetoric from your hands, but merely to challenge it. Hence I will be forming a sub-caucus faction ala Labour Left/Right, together with Govanni, Mechaman, SewerSocialist, and all other comers. We will be making policy recommendations from our perspective for your perusal.

Sounds a bit divisive.

The dialogue would be healthy for the Caucus.

I agree.
The sooner we can destroy the "No True Scotsman" attitude amongst some of our posters the better.

[Sewer]

I agree.
The sooner we can destroy the "No True Scotsman" attitude amongst some of our posters the better.

Sorry I have views.

[Mechaman]

I agree.
The sooner we can destroy the "No True Scotsman" attitude amongst some of our posters the better.

Sorry I have views.

You keep your views, but don't go around parading them as the only way. That is what I mean by "No True Scotsman". What I have found most irritating (now I'm not saying I'm not guilty, in fact I'm guilty as hell of committing this) is the amount of forumers who have taken up an ideology and have committed that anyone else who follows said ideology must have their same views or else they're fakes.
Example: Poster A: No true Scotsman likes sugar. Poster B: Well Angus is a Scotsman and he likes sugar. Poster A: Well then he is not a true Scotsman.
Do you get where I'm coming from now?

[Sewer]

I do not ask for the same views, I ask for similar views, as in not 100% different views.