PPP Poll Choice

[Tender Branson]

PPP lets us decide again where they will poll next:

- California. We haven't gone there yet this cycle and the polling has been a little contradictory, particularly on the question of how much trouble Barbara Boxer is or is not in.

- Colorado. I believe Rasmussen that Michael Bennet is down a good bit to Jane Norton and that the Governor's race is a toss up with perhaps a small lean toward John Hickenlooper but it's one of those deals where it's good to have looks from multiple pollsters.

- New Mexico. As I've said before I'm interested to see if the political climate has the Governor's race here up in the air. And although I'm not going to promise this, because New Mexico has only 3 Congressional districts we might be able to do a small sample poll (300-400 probably) within each of those as long as we're doing the statewide one.

- Ohio. Same thing as Colorado really- I believe that Republicans are ahead in the races for both Senate and Governor but we haven't looked at it since June and another set of eyes is never a bad thing.

- Vermont. The Governor's race here seems to be one of the better offensive opportunities for Democrats this year but to my knowledge there's been no polling on it.

- Washington. If Republicans were going to somehow do the impossible and take the Senate this fall Patty Murray's seat is one they might need to win- we'd look at whether Dino Rossi or Dave Reichert could do anything there.

Voting is open until Thursday morning.

http://publicpolicypolling.blogspot.com/2010/02/and-choices-are.html

Voted for New Mexico, allthough Vermont isn`t polled all the time too ...

[Kaine for Senate '18]

I voted Colorado.

[TheGreatOne]

I voted Colorado.

Yeah, I think its become a bellwhether state.

[pbrower2a]

New Mexico. No polls there since September.

[Tender Branson]

Don`t know why people are voting for CA and WA, when Rasmussen just did them.

(Maybe they don`t know that yet)

[ConservativeIllini]

Good Lord, if CA ends up winning, that will suck.  I would like anything on that list except CA and VT...

[Hash]

Vermont, PLEASE!

[Vepres]

I voted California. It's under polled, and as they said polls have been contradictory as to how much trouble boxer is in.

[xavier110]

I voted Vermont because it's never polled.

[Хahar 🤔]

I voted California. It's under polled, and as they said polls have been contradictory as to how much trouble boxer is in.

Hint: None.

[Rowan]

I voted California. It's under polled, and as they said polls have been contradictory as to how much trouble boxer is in.

Hint: None.

Neither was Evan Bayh...oh wait...

[Хahar 🤔]

I voted California. It's under polled, and as they said polls have been contradictory as to how much trouble boxer is in.

Hint: None.

Neither was Evan Bayh...oh wait...

OK.

It's pretty clear that someone had something on him. Tell me when that happens to Boxer.

[CatoMinor]

I voted Vermont

[Tender Branson]

NM seems to be winning now.

[redcommander]

I voted California. It's under polled, and as they said polls have been contradictory as to how much trouble boxer is in.

Hint: None.

Neither was Evan Bayh...oh wait...

OK.

It's pretty clear that someone had something on him. Tell me when that happens to Boxer.

Two words. Tom Campbell.

[Хahar 🤔]

I voted California. It's under polled, and as they said polls have been contradictory as to how much trouble boxer is in.

Hint: None.

Neither was Evan Bayh...oh wait...

OK.

It's pretty clear that someone had something on him. Tell me when that happens to Boxer.

Two words. Tom Campbell.

He wouldn't beat Boxer, but he's not getting anywhere near the nomination at any rate.