Maps For This Scenario: 2012 Primary Newt, Mitt, Thune, Johnson, Rudy
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 03:26:23 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Maps For This Scenario: 2012 Primary Newt, Mitt, Thune, Johnson, Rudy
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Maps For This Scenario: 2012 Primary Newt, Mitt, Thune, Johnson, Rudy  (Read 1800 times)
California8429
A-Bob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,785
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 12, 2010, 02:43:13 PM »
« edited: February 13, 2010, 10:10:13 PM by A-Bob »

Newt Gingrich
Mitt Romney
John Thune
Haley Barbour
Gary Johnson
Rudy Giuliani
Logged
California8429
A-Bob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,785
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 12, 2010, 02:51:09 PM »

For 2012 primaries I mean
Logged
CatoMinor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,007
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 12, 2010, 04:44:47 PM »


Romney
Gingrich
Johnson
Thune
Logged
Psychic Octopus
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,948
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 12, 2010, 06:43:20 PM »



Romney in Green, Gingrich in Blue, Thune in Red, Johnson in Gray. Something tells me that Giuliani and Barbour would drop out after the first primary states, as they would fail to gain traction. Barbour would have spent time competing with Gingrich for SC, and Giuliani with Romney, and to a lesser extent, Johnson, for New Hampshire. Thune is able to pull off Iowa and take several of the states close to his home, but he cannot overcome Newt Gingrich or Mitt Romney, as they are both more popular politically. In the end, Romney is able to pull off a victory, largely credited to large amount of "movement" candidates in the race and the party unwilling to accept Gary Johnson.
Logged
Psychic Octopus
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,948
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 12, 2010, 07:51:25 PM »

An alternate scenario focuses on a Giuliani victory in New Hampshire, and a Gingrich victory in Iowa, which leads to a huge clash.
Logged
milhouse24
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,331
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 17, 2010, 12:02:38 AM »

Newt Gingrich
Mitt Romney
John Thune
Haley Barbour
Gary Johnson
Rudy Giuliani

I fail to see the appeal of Gingrich.  He's been out of govt for such a long time.  He should have run for governor or senate.  I just don't think he has much appeal with conservatives, especially since he is many times divorced. 

Barbour will be a strong surprise in the primaries, but I think Thune could beat him in Iowa and SC.
Logged
The Mikado
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,774


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 17, 2010, 12:32:16 PM »

I don't see Johnson lasting until the NM primary.

Rudy Giuliani spends his entire time campaigning in Florida, again, and doesn't win a state.


Logged
useful idiot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,720


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 17, 2010, 02:36:03 PM »

Giuliani and Gingrich fail to gain any traction. If they don't drop out by Iowa then they will by NH. Romney grabs most of the Northeast, winning NH and keeping him in the race after losing Iowa to Thune. Barbour takes a lot of the old Huckabee vote, but lack of comparable charm causes him not to do as well as Huck.

Logged
sentinel
sirnick
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,733
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -6.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: February 17, 2010, 02:52:20 PM »

Giuliani and Gingrich fail to gain any traction. If they don't drop out by Iowa then they will by NH. Romney grabs most of the Northeast, winning NH and keeping him in the race after losing Iowa to Thune. Barbour takes a lot of the old Huckabee vote, but lack of comparable charm causes him not to do as well as Huck.



I think Romney would win the same mid-west states he won in 2008 and maybe more.
Logged
useful idiot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,720


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: February 17, 2010, 03:22:43 PM »

Giuliani and Gingrich fail to gain any traction. If they don't drop out by Iowa then they will by NH. Romney grabs most of the Northeast, winning NH and keeping him in the race after losing Iowa to Thune. Barbour takes a lot of the old Huckabee vote, but lack of comparable charm causes him not to do as well as Huck.



I think Romney would win the same mid-west states he won in 2008 and maybe more.

With Thune in the race, I highly doubt it. Romney won what he did because he wasn't Huckabee or a "moderate" like McCain, and had a ton of cash. Thune is a conservative, Romney doesn't know what he is. Thune is an evangelical who with this group of adulterers(Gingrich), potheads(Johnson), pro-abortionists(Giuliani), automatically takes that vote; we all know exactly what Romney's religion is.

I think Thune is the real deal. He knows how to behave and he appeals to all the right constituencies. Romney is like chewed gum, the flavor of which you didn't even like in the first place.
Logged
TheGreatOne
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 477


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: February 17, 2010, 03:46:17 PM »

LOL to ^.  Romney would take Nevada.  That's mormon country.  Everyone outside of Las Vegas and Reno love him.
Logged
Electric Feel
ElectricFeel
Rookie
**
Posts: 212
Mexico


Political Matrix
E: -0.06, S: -5.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: February 17, 2010, 03:54:35 PM »

Newt Gingrich
Mitt Romney
John Thune
Haley Barbour
Gary Johnson
Rudy Giuliani

If these are their choices, the Republicans are screwed.
Logged
perdedor
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,638


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: February 17, 2010, 04:32:57 PM »

Newt Gingrich
Mitt Romney
John Thune
Haley Barbour
Gary Johnson
Rudy Giuliani

If these are their choices, the Republicans are screwed.

^

I would like to see Giuliani win the nomination, though. Can you imagine the what would happen to the Republican Party if a pro-choice, pro-gay, pro-gun control northerner was to be its Presidential nominee. It would be a complete catastrophe.
Logged
milhouse24
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,331
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: February 17, 2010, 09:35:15 PM »

Newt Gingrich
Mitt Romney
John Thune
Haley Barbour
Gary Johnson
Rudy Giuliani

If these are their choices, the Republicans are screwed.

^

I would like to see Giuliani win the nomination, though. Can you imagine the what would happen to the Republican Party if a pro-choice, pro-gay, pro-gun control northerner was to be its Presidential nominee. It would be a complete catastrophe.

Yeah, obviously that would never happen, unless it was a Romney-Giuliani-Bloomberg independent Rockefeller republican ticket!
Logged
useful idiot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,720


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: February 18, 2010, 12:05:21 AM »

LOL to ^.  Romney would take Nevada.  That's mormon country.  Everyone outside of Las Vegas and Reno love him.

He got 51% of the vote there against a weak field in 08. Only 11% of Nevada is LDS anyway. A conservative westerner could easily swing two percent of the vote if momentum is on his side.
Logged
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: February 18, 2010, 12:23:30 AM »

If Thune takes Iowa (some of which is inside SD's media market), I think he will run the table in the South except for the others' home states.  he could bring the fiscal and social conservative wings of the party together like no other GOP candidate could.

Romney, if he thinks Thune is running, has to be fearing him more than any other GOP contender.

Thune's biggest threat is Palin, but I think Palin is finished within the GOP, esp if she keeps doing interviews. 

What do the taking heads (Hannity/Rush/Beck) think of Thune?  Thune will need them to help derail Palin.  Iowa gives Thune the perfect chance to present a reason for the talking heads to unite behind him.  And if Thune gets FOXNews and talk radio in this corner, the nomination is his.

Basically, Palin needs to leave the stage.
Logged
petedewolfe
Rookie
**
Posts: 52
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: February 18, 2010, 12:43:43 AM »


Huh
Logged
useful idiot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,720


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: February 18, 2010, 01:08:40 AM »
« Edited: February 18, 2010, 01:10:30 AM by useful idiot »


Giuliani is pro-choice, Evangelicals tend to frown on that sort of thing...
Logged
Shilly
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 590
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: February 18, 2010, 02:02:59 AM »



Romney
Thune
Barbour
Johnson

Don't know why, but this seems right to me.
Logged
milhouse24
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,331
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: February 18, 2010, 01:06:48 PM »

Giuliani and Gingrich fail to gain any traction. If they don't drop out by Iowa then they will by NH. Romney grabs most of the Northeast, winning NH and keeping him in the race after losing Iowa to Thune. Barbour takes a lot of the old Huckabee vote, but lack of comparable charm causes him not to do as well as Huck.



I think Romney would win the same mid-west states he won in 2008 and maybe more.

With Thune in the race, I highly doubt it. Romney won what he did because he wasn't Huckabee or a "moderate" like McCain, and had a ton of cash. Thune is a conservative, Romney doesn't know what he is. Thune is an evangelical who with this group of adulterers(Gingrich), potheads(Johnson), pro-abortionists(Giuliani), automatically takes that vote; we all know exactly what Romney's religion is.

I think Thune is the real deal. He knows how to behave and he appeals to all the right constituencies. Romney is like chewed gum, the flavor of which you didn't even like in the first place.

I just don't think an average midwest/southern Christian rural voter making less than 100k would have any interest in voting for Romney.  Northerners are very secular and open-minded to different religions, but everywhere else people take religion very seriously.  For wealthy GOP voters over 100k, they trust romney, but the average voter won't.  He's sort of like a moving target, he's trying to appeal to everyone, but he's just a bland number-crunching CEO who will ship your job to China.
Logged
milhouse24
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,331
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: February 18, 2010, 01:19:58 PM »

If Thune takes Iowa (some of which is inside SD's media market), I think he will run the table in the South except for the others' home states.  he could bring the fiscal and social conservative wings of the party together like no other GOP candidate could.

Romney, if he thinks Thune is running, has to be fearing him more than any other GOP contender.

Thune's biggest threat is Palin, but I think Palin is finished within the GOP, esp if she keeps doing interviews. 

What do the taking heads (Hannity/Rush/Beck) think of Thune?  Thune will need them to help derail Palin.  Iowa gives Thune the perfect chance to present a reason for the talking heads to unite behind him.  And if Thune gets FOXNews and talk radio in this corner, the nomination is his.

Basically, Palin needs to leave the stage.
 

I think Huckabee would have beaten McCain in SC if lazy Fred Thompson didn't find the energy to campaign there.  So there is the worry that Thune and Barbour would split the vote in SC and give it to Romney by accident, now that would be scary. 

I fail to see how Palin is sustaining her popularity.  Sure she is pretty, photogenic, weirdly outspoken, and acting as an anti-Obama in the media by default.  She a flavor of the year, but I don't see how the Republican leadership can rally around Palin.  Sure Dubya was a dufus but he had smart and powerful friends/family.  Palin is just a hillbilly dufus who can't get out of her way, with very little accomplishments.  She would be great as a talking head for a certain audience, but what CEO would want her leading the nation and trusting her with the button.  I just want an experienced, non-senile leader.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.061 seconds with 12 queries.