Romney, Gingrich, Pawlenty
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 11:42:46 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Romney, Gingrich, Pawlenty
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Romney, Gingrich, Pawlenty  (Read 1936 times)
California8429
A-Bob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,785
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 05, 2009, 05:15:35 PM »
« edited: December 06, 2009, 12:05:25 PM by A-Bob »

Say that's our top people in 2012. Who wins what, discuss with maps

Now without Thune in the picture
Logged
segwaystyle2012
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,366


Political Matrix
E: 9.68, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 05, 2009, 05:21:20 PM »

Thune is not a contender. Who would vote for him?
Logged
Progressive
jro660
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,581


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 05, 2009, 05:22:02 PM »

I say the order is

Romney
Gingrich
Thune
Pawlenty

Romney and Gingrich fight for first place
Logged
Vepres
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,032
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 05, 2009, 05:31:56 PM »

Thune seems more like a possible VP than a Presidential candidate.

I'd say in odds they'll get the nomination it's:

Romney
Gingrich
A darkhorse candidate
Pawlenty
Logged
Alexander Hamilton
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,167
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: -5.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 05, 2009, 06:43:12 PM »

Romney
Pawlenty


That's it.
Logged
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: December 06, 2009, 06:28:02 AM »

Thune is not a contender. Who would vote for him?

He's the most evangelical of the four.  He'll also be the only one of the four with a job.
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: December 06, 2009, 08:40:17 AM »

Thune can be in a time a Senate Republican Leader rather. Since he'll be probably reelected in 2010, he can be eventually V.P. nominee, but nothing more.

Logged
California8429
A-Bob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,785
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: December 06, 2009, 12:01:20 PM »

ok, let's take Thune out of the picture then. Who wins what states?
Logged
Lahbas
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 568
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: December 06, 2009, 01:04:39 PM »

Likely this...................



Green - Romney
Blue - Gingrich
Red - Pawlenty

Even though Gringrich's approval ratings are still low, it can be assumed that he will have sought to try and raise them beforehand and while campaigning. Pawlenty will probably not gain traction and only split the vote with Romney, which is why Gingrich wins states like Wyoming and Idaho. However, since the economy is likely to be the problem, Romney will have the edge, and after Pawlenty's inevitable withdrawal, wwill cruise to victory.
Logged
useful idiot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,720


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: December 06, 2009, 01:16:52 PM »

The primaries aren't one big election day, so you can't say "who wins what" or make a map because momentum over an extended period of time plays a huge part. If one of these guys doesn't win Iowa, New Hampshire, or South Carolina then they're through. If one of them wins both Iowa and New Hampshire then they're probably going to take the nod. There are so many factors.

Of these three however Romney will probably do the best, followed by Gingrich and then Pawlenty...
Logged
Vepres
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,032
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: December 06, 2009, 03:05:49 PM »

Let's assume for argument's sake that the primary schedule is the same as this year's. After Super Tuesday I could see this map:



Same color scheme as Lahbas.  I know NJ seems weird, but my gut feeling was that Gingrich would somehow pull off a narrow win there.
Logged
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,030
Czech Republic


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: December 06, 2009, 06:57:07 PM »

Thune is not a contender. Who would vote for him?

He's the most evangelical of the four.  He'll also be the only one of the four with a job.

^^^^
Logged
Psychic Octopus
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,948
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: December 06, 2009, 07:03:37 PM »

Romney
Pawlenty
Logged
paul718
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,012


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: December 07, 2009, 08:27:29 AM »

Likely this...................



Green - Romney
Blue - Gingrich
Red - Pawlenty

Even though Gringrich's approval ratings are still low, it can be assumed that he will have sought to try and raise them beforehand and while campaigning. Pawlenty will probably not gain traction and only split the vote with Romney, which is why Gingrich wins states like Wyoming and Idaho. However, since the economy is likely to be the problem, Romney will have the edge, and after Pawlenty's inevitable withdrawal, wwill cruise to victory.

I think Pawlenty would fare better in the Deep South.
Logged
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,030
Czech Republic


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: December 07, 2009, 04:25:43 PM »

What the last two posts said.

Gingrich really would not do as well in the South as some people think.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.049 seconds with 12 queries.