Ohio's Issue 3 (2009) Results
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 08:51:33 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Ohio's Issue 3 (2009) Results
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Ohio's Issue 3 (2009) Results  (Read 3620 times)
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,080
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 08, 2009, 03:59:39 AM »

The only thing of interest on the ballot this year:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Full results by county


         





Yes  52.97%
No    47.03%
Logged
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 08, 2009, 04:10:38 AM »

one in each city?  lolfail
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,080
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 08, 2009, 04:11:04 AM »

Here are the results for the four counties whose cities will be getting these casinos:

Cuyahoga (Cleveland):  65% Yes; 35% No

Hamilton (Cincinnati):  67% Yes; 33% No

Franklin (Columbus):  42% Yes; 58% No

Lucas (Toledo):  53% Yes; 47% No


I really don't get Franklin county.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 08, 2009, 04:12:15 AM »

What were the arguments for/against this other than "I WANT A CASINO HERE"/"NO HERE"?
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,080
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 08, 2009, 04:20:56 AM »

What were the arguments for/against this other than "I WANT A CASINO HERE"/"NO HERE"?

To be honest I couldn't have given a rat's ass and thus didn't pay much attention, but apparently the argument for was based on the casinos generating  multi-bajillion dollars in revenue and thousands of jaeorbs for Ohians, and the argument against was a laundry list of gripes about anything and everything, including the fact that the casinos would "only" be taxed 33% of their revenue.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 08, 2009, 04:26:00 AM »

What were the arguments for/against this other than "I WANT A CASINO HERE"/"NO HERE"?

To be honest I couldn't have given a rat's ass and thus didn't pay much attention, but apparently the argument for was based on the casinos generating  multi-bajillion dollars in revenue and thousands of jaeorbs for Ohians, and the argument against was a laundry list of gripes about anything and everything, including the fact that the casinos would "only" be taxed 33% of their revenue.

Too bad you don't live in a state that doesn't address the true pressing issues of democracy
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,080
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 08, 2009, 04:39:21 AM »

Too bad you don't live in a state that doesn't address the true pressing issues of democracy

Interesting.  Tell me, fifteen years later, does the mighty Dentistry & Othodontic Technicians Union still hold sway over Cowlitz county these days?
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 08, 2009, 04:51:32 AM »

Too bad you don't live in a state that doesn't address the true pressing issues of democracy

Interesting.  Tell me, fifteen years later, does the mighty Dentistry & Othodontic Technicians Union still hold sway over Cowlitz county these days?

High-quality dentures are important in a county where so few citizens still have teeth
Logged
Padfoot
padfoot714
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,531
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 08, 2009, 11:41:24 PM »

What were the arguments for/against this other than "I WANT A CASINO HERE"/"NO HERE"?

The major "yes" arguments were a smattering of new jobs and the promise that the millions that Ohioans currently spend on out of state casinos will instead be spent here and then we can collect the taxes from those millions.

The "no" vote consisted of an extremely diverse coalition of people morally opposed to gambling and the "blight" it brings, other gambling interests who fear competition for Ohio dollars, people opposed to creating what amounts to a monopoly in our state constitution, and others opposed to the absolutely abhorrent language of the amendment.

I'm more than willing to bet that Franklin County (and Columbus) voted no for two major reasons.  #1. the local paper came out strongly against the amendment #2 unlike the other major cities receiving casinos, Columbus has a really nice thing going on in our Downtown "Arena District" and most people here fear that a casino will ruin the family friendly entertainment atmosphere that's been established.  I doubt the casino developer is going to have an easy time of getting their casino built here in Columbus.  We're fighting it tooth and nail.
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,080
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 09, 2009, 01:01:53 AM »

It's probably quite ironic that while people back home were voting on this oh-so-important "issue", I was in Vegas.
Logged
JSojourner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,510
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -6.94

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: November 09, 2009, 12:08:54 PM »

Joe, thanks.  Very interesting.
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,317
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: November 10, 2009, 01:11:09 PM »

What were the arguments for/against this other than "I WANT A CASINO HERE"/"NO HERE"?

The major "yes" arguments were a smattering of new jobs and the promise that the millions that Ohioans currently spend on out of state casinos will instead be spent here and then we can collect the taxes from those millions.

The "no" vote consisted of an extremely diverse coalition of people morally opposed to gambling and the "blight" it brings, other gambling interests who fear competition for Ohio dollars, people opposed to creating what amounts to a monopoly in our state constitution, and others opposed to the absolutely abhorrent language of the amendment.

I'm more than willing to bet that Franklin County (and Columbus) voted no for two major reasons.  #1. the local paper came out strongly against the amendment #2 unlike the other major cities receiving casinos, Columbus has a really nice thing going on in our Downtown "Arena District" and most people here fear that a casino will ruin the family friendly entertainment atmosphere that's been established.  I doubt the casino developer is going to have an easy time of getting their casino built here in Columbus.  We're fighting it tooth and nail.

About sums it up. Columbus is the only large city in Ohio that's actually growing and his a vibrant downtown. Also the Dispatch holds more sway over voters with their endorsement than most big city papers. Not to mention there were some progressives who actually opposed the measure (though I sure wasn't one of them).
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.034 seconds with 11 queries.