Northeast Assembly Thread
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 12:24:06 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government
  Regional Governments (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Northeast Assembly Thread
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 88 89 90 91 92 [93] 94 95 96 97 98 ... 239
Author Topic: Northeast Assembly Thread  (Read 381167 times)
The Age Wave
silent_spade07
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 944
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -2.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2300 on: April 05, 2010, 02:47:32 PM »

I think we should table the measure. I would support an amendment that allowed for training new officers so we can just fire all these strikers.

VASTLY expensive proposition, and you can't "train" years or decades of experience on the streets into rookies.

And since when do people like you care about how expensive something is? Okay then.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

No because the union has proved it is out of control and unwilling to compromise for the sake of the public. They need strangled.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,721


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2301 on: April 05, 2010, 07:14:03 PM »
« Edited: April 05, 2010, 07:15:46 PM by cinyc »



Okay.  This debate has gone nowhere.  Time to put the bill to a vote:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

This vote shall remain open until the earlier of 8:15 PM on Tuesday, April 6, 2010, or when all representatives shall have voted.
Logged
President Mitt
Giovanni
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,347
Samoa


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2302 on: April 05, 2010, 07:31:59 PM »

Aye
Logged
The Age Wave
silent_spade07
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 944
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -2.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2303 on: April 05, 2010, 07:48:38 PM »

Nay
Logged
#CriminalizeSobriety
Dallasfan65
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,859


Political Matrix
E: 5.48, S: -9.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2304 on: April 05, 2010, 08:47:36 PM »

Aye.
Logged
AndrewTX
AndrewCT
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,091


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2305 on: April 05, 2010, 09:17:15 PM »

Abstain
Logged
The Age Wave
silent_spade07
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 944
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -2.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2306 on: April 05, 2010, 09:37:43 PM »

I'm going to motion to debate the CJO amendment and Seats number amendment simultaneously.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,721


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2307 on: April 06, 2010, 12:15:29 PM »

I'm going to motion to debate the CJO amendment and Seats number amendment simultaneously.

I'm going to hold off on this until after the current vote to avoid confusion.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,721


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2308 on: April 06, 2010, 12:16:17 PM »

Nay.

We already have a national guard unit.  I'm not sure what this adds.
Logged
Grumpier Than Uncle Joe
GM3PRP
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,080
Greece
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2309 on: April 06, 2010, 12:18:14 PM »

Aye
Logged
Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey
hantheguitarman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,025


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2310 on: April 06, 2010, 03:28:49 PM »

Aye
Logged
redcommander
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,816
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2311 on: April 06, 2010, 09:03:01 PM »

Aye
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,721


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2312 on: April 06, 2010, 09:43:42 PM »



By a vote of 4-2 with 1 express absention. one late aye vote after the voting period had ended but before I closed the vote, and one absence, the Northeastern Emergency Militia Act passes, and shall be sent to the Governor for his signature or veto.

Next bill:

CJO Term Amendment

Article VI of the Northeast Consitution is amended to read:
 
i) The judicial branch of the Government of the Northeast Region shall be vested in the Chief Judicial Officer of the Northeast Region.

ii) The Chief Judicial Officer is to be appointed by the Governor with the confirmation of the Legislative Assembly. He or she shall have a term of four months, with the option of renewal. Whenever the office of Chief Judicial Officer becomes vacant, then he or she must be replaced within one month.

 iii) The Chief Judicial Officer is to be charged with the duties of interpreting the laws of the Northeast Region and is charged to hold trials for the convicted. If someone submits a case to him or her, then the Chief Judicial Officer must make a ruling on it, giving ample time to hear arguments from any side of the issue. The Chief Judicial Officer’s rulings are to be considered precedent for all future cases.iv) No persons shall hold the positions of Governor and Chief Judicial Officer at the same time, and whereas no persons shall hold the positions of Lieutenant Governor and Chief Judicial Officer at the same time. No persons shall serve as Chief Judicial Officer and Northeast Representative at the same time.

Sponsor:Rep. hantheguitarman

The question is whether the bill should be considered?

The ayes have it.

Debate on this bill will continue until at least 10:45PM Eastern on Thursday, April 8, 2010, unless the debate period is extended or shortened in accordance with the SOAP.

The Sponsor, Representative hantheguitarman, has the floor.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,721


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2313 on: April 06, 2010, 09:45:10 PM »

There's a motion on the floor to simultaneously consider the Seats Number Amendment with the bill on the floor.

All those in favor shall vote aye, those opposed, nay. 

Debate on the CJO Term Amendment shall continue while this vote is taken.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,721


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2314 on: April 06, 2010, 09:47:56 PM »

Aye on the motion to simultaneously consider.
Logged
Grumpier Than Uncle Joe
GM3PRP
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,080
Greece
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2315 on: April 07, 2010, 09:10:28 AM »

Aye on the motion to simultaneously consider.
Logged
Grumpier Than Uncle Joe
GM3PRP
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,080
Greece
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2316 on: April 07, 2010, 09:11:20 AM »
« Edited: April 07, 2010, 09:14:39 AM by Grumps »

What's the substantive difference between the current wording for the CJO and the new proposed wording?
Logged
President Mitt
Giovanni
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,347
Samoa


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2317 on: April 07, 2010, 09:12:48 AM »

Logged
#CriminalizeSobriety
Dallasfan65
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,859


Political Matrix
E: 5.48, S: -9.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2318 on: April 07, 2010, 10:18:42 AM »

What's the substantive difference between the current wording for the CJO and the new proposed wording?
Closes a loophole about dual-office holding, and requires them to be assembly approved.
Logged
Grumpier Than Uncle Joe
GM3PRP
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,080
Greece
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2319 on: April 07, 2010, 10:23:48 AM »

What's the substantive difference between the current wording for the CJO and the new proposed wording?
Closes a loophole about dual-office holding, and requires them to be assembly approved.

Thanks, my good colleague.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,721


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2320 on: April 07, 2010, 10:59:35 AM »

What's the substantive difference between the current wording for the CJO and the new proposed wording?
Closes a loophole about dual-office holding, and requires them to be assembly approved.

Thanks, my good colleague.

Changes the term from 1 year to 4 months, if I'm not mistaken.  That shouldn't apply retroactively, in my opinion.  I'll have an amendment.
Logged
AndrewTX
AndrewCT
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,091


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2321 on: April 07, 2010, 11:06:31 AM »

Logged
The Age Wave
silent_spade07
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 944
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -2.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2322 on: April 07, 2010, 12:55:11 PM »

Aye on the motion
Logged
Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey
hantheguitarman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,025


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2323 on: April 07, 2010, 03:21:35 PM »

Ooh, sorry I didn't see this already. Anyway, my proposed CJO Term Amendment will make the CJO more accountable to the legislature, and the people.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,721


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2324 on: April 07, 2010, 04:09:33 PM »

Ooh, sorry I didn't see this already. Anyway, my proposed CJO Term Amendment will make the CJO more accountable to the legislature, and the people.

Is it supposed to apply retroactively to the current CJO, who has a number of months left on his term?
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 88 89 90 91 92 [93] 94 95 96 97 98 ... 239  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.058 seconds with 12 queries.