The GOP Southern Strategy-concentrated in suburbs and cities?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 05:40:13 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  The GOP Southern Strategy-concentrated in suburbs and cities?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: The GOP Southern Strategy-concentrated in suburbs and cities?  (Read 1562 times)
All Along The Watchtower
Progressive Realist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,519
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 24, 2009, 09:59:54 PM »

I have a Political Almanac from 1983 with all the members of that session of Congress in it. What struck me was that the Republicans in the South were representing cities and suburban areas; the rural areas were still dominated by Democrats at that time.

Furthermore, it seems that many of the counties carried by George Wallace in the South were carried by Jimmy Carter, and Nixon's strongest areas in the South were in the suburbs. Which brings up another point: Texas had two Republican congressman in the late 1960s, and one of them, George H. W. Bush, was representing a suburban district of Houston.

So, is it fair to say that the Southern strategy was mainly concentrated in the suburbs and cities of the South, and not as much as in rural areas?
Logged
Scam of God
Einzige
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,159
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.19, S: -9.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 24, 2009, 10:23:16 PM »

It's probably more apt to say that the GOP particularly targeted the urban enclaves of northern-and-midwestern emigrants to the South, who, while adopting its cultural trappings to assimilate themselves, were far too materially comfortable to also take command of its populism. They gradually displaced the native barbarians, until the both of them are alike in their barbarity.
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,409
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 25, 2009, 07:14:13 AM »

The Southern suburbia is the one which is sociologically closest to the Republican Party, since it's mostly quite affluent.

And those areas are still some of the strongest Republican areas, just look at Birmingham suburbia.
Logged
jokerman
Cosmo Kramer
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,808
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 01, 2009, 12:11:19 AM »
« Edited: October 01, 2009, 12:13:07 AM by jokerman »

"The Southern Strategy" is a GOP strategy that was adopted in the late 60s and 70s after and on top of a previously existing movement toward the GOP in the south that began post WWII.  This early movement towards the GOP was part of the "new south."  It was not really related to race, although its members identified with the national GOP's conservative stance on national defense and anti-communism.  It took root on the periphery of southern society, in the literal geographic sense and where people had been uprooted from southern life in the burgeoning industrial centers and suburbs, and was very strong in states with high populations of migrants from the north.  Compare Nixon vs. Wallace in 1968.  The electorate of the former was the original base of the Southern GOP.  "The Southern Strategy" is formulated as a method of combining most voters from both the Wallace and Nixon electorate to dominate the south.  None the less, Wallace voters (who constitute the base of the Southern GOP now) swing back and forth from Democrat to Republican well into the 1980s.
Logged
The Age Wave
silent_spade07
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 944
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -2.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 01, 2009, 02:01:36 AM »

Arguably, this strategy ruined the Democratic Party. Not by diminishing electoral chances, but by forcing an altering of the composition that left the electorate a bunch of suburbanite latte liberals who don't know anything about the plight of the working man.
Logged
Alexander Hamilton
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,167
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: -5.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 01, 2009, 02:05:09 AM »

Arguably, this strategy ruined the Democratic Party. Not by diminishing electoral chances, but by forcing an altering of the composition that left the electorate a bunch of suburbanite latte liberals who don't know anything about the plight of the working man.

It hurt my party much, much more.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.034 seconds with 12 queries.