Was Woodrow Wilson a U.S. dictator? I think he was...

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

Wilson was an awful man, but alas, he was not a dictator.


I'd also like to point out that Bush is a 21st Century example of Wilsonianism in the modern age.

Except George Bush cared about black people.

To the Comedy Goldmine!

[Alexander Hamilton]

Wilson was an awful man, but alas, he was not a dictator.


I'd also like to point out that Bush is a 21st Century example of Wilsonianism in the modern age.

Except George Bush cared about black people.

To the Comedy Goldmine!

Hey, tough love is still caring right?

[Lief 🗽]

I'd also like to point out that Bush is a 21st Century example of Wilsonianism in the modern age.

No, not really.

[President Mitt]

An asshole racist statefag, but not a dictator

[Free Palestine]

I'd also like to point out that Bush is a 21st Century example of Wilsonianism in the modern age.

No, not really.

In Wilson's Congressional Government, he proposed that the president should have unilateral power, and he should be as "big a man as he can."  In addition, Wilson got us into an unnecessary war and eroded civil liberties.  He certainly has parallels to Bush.

[Lief 🗽]

I'd also like to point out that Bush is a 21st Century example of Wilsonianism in the modern age.

No, not really.

In Wilson's Congressional Government, he proposed that the president should have unilateral power, and he should be as "big a man as he can."  In addition, Wilson got us into an unnecessary war and eroded civil liberties.  He certainly has parallels to Bush.

Every single President since FDR can be described like that.

[Kaine for Senate '18]

I think, to a degree, Bush and Wilson share a similar foreign policy.  The spread of democracy is big for both of them, as is the religious tilt they have to it.  Wilson was more bilateral, though, than Bush, and more competent.

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

I think, to a degree, Bush and Wilson share a similar foreign policy.  The spread of democracy is big for both of them, as is the religious tilt they have to it.  Wilson was more bilateral, though, than Bush, and more competent.

That's not hard

[Alexander Hamilton]

I think, to a degree, Bush and Wilson share a similar foreign policy.  The spread of democracy is big for both of them, as is the religious tilt they have to it.  Wilson was more bilateral, though, than Bush, and more competent.

That's not hard

Sadly that's not true, either

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

I think, to a degree, Bush and Wilson share a similar foreign policy.  The spread of democracy is big for both of them, as is the religious tilt they have to it.  Wilson was more bilateral, though, than Bush, and more competent.

That's not hard

Sadly that's not true, either

I don't understand how can anyone still regard Bush as a good President

[Alexander Hamilton]

I think, to a degree, Bush and Wilson share a similar foreign policy.  The spread of democracy is big for both of them, as is the religious tilt they have to it.  Wilson was more bilateral, though, than Bush, and more competent.

That's not hard

Sadly that's not true, either

I don't understand how can anyone still regard Bush as a good President

I don't understand how anyone can still regard Wilson as a good President

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

I think, to a degree, Bush and Wilson share a similar foreign policy.  The spread of democracy is big for both of them, as is the religious tilt they have to it.  Wilson was more bilateral, though, than Bush, and more competent.

That's not hard

Sadly that's not true, either

I don't understand how can anyone still regard Bush as a good President

I don't understand how anyone can still regard Wilson as a good President

So I don't