Senate Discussion and Noticeboard

[Franzl]

Prohibition backfired cause the public and gov't were not committed to enforcement. I do oppose the re-prohibtion of alcohol though.

I repeat my question. Why do you hate freedom? Let people decide for themselves what they want to buy, or what they want to look at.....or who they want to have sex with and marry.

Stop the nanny state.

[RIP Robert H Bork]

It's interesting that this bill hasn't been mentioned here yet.

Of course, I strongly support it.

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

Prohibition backfired cause the public and gov't were not committed to enforcement. I do oppose the re-prohibtion of alcohol though.

I repeat my question. Why do you hate freedom? Let people decide for themselves what they want to buy, or what they want to look at.....or who they want to have sex with and marry.

Stop the nanny state.

Because I hate people. I don't trust them, and I don't like them. So they need to be controlled and kept in there place by the rigid social structure, cause god forbid they should be a nuisance to my goals.

[Hash]

So, you support an authoritarian regime?

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

So, you support an authoritarian regime?

I used to especially the Monarchic form, but not anymore. I have come to "accept" Democracy and the political freedoms that come with it. The social structure is still a necessity what I basically want is a more inclusive, less racist/sexist 1950's culture.

[Franzl]

So, you support an authoritarian regime?

I used to especially the Monarchic form, but not anymore. I have come to "accept" Democracy and the political freedoms that come with it. The social structure is still a necessity what I basically want is a more inclusive, less racist/sexist 1950's culture.

Well luckily we have a sensible majority in the Senate that will reject attempts to take us back to the Middle Ages.

[Marokai Backbeat]

So, you support an authoritarian regime?

I used to especially the Monarchic form, but not anymore. I have come to "accept" Democracy and the political freedoms that come with it. The social structure is still a necessity what I basically want is a more inclusive, less racist/sexist 1950's culture.

So you want the 1950's without everything that made the 1950's the 1950's. Okay.

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

So, you support an authoritarian regime?

I used to especially the Monarchic form, but not anymore. I have come to "accept" Democracy and the political freedoms that come with it. The social structure is still a necessity what I basically want is a more inclusive, less racist/sexist 1950's culture.

So you want the 1950's without everything that made the 1950's the 1950's. Okay.

You define the 1950's by racism, sexism, etc.

I define it by conformity, acceptance of institutions and respect for culture, society and country.

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

So, you support an authoritarian regime?

I used to especially the Monarchic form, but not anymore. I have come to "accept" Democracy and the political freedoms that come with it. The social structure is still a necessity what I basically want is a more inclusive, less racist/sexist 1950's culture.

Well luckily we have a sensible majority in the Senate that will reject attempts to take us back to the Middle Ages.

No I wouldn't go that far back. The farthest back I would go in such of inspiration for a better moral, civil and societal structure is the Victorian Era. If I could have the Eisenhower era of society with todays technology, equality and economic complexity I would be happy.

[Hash]

So, you support an authoritarian regime?

I used to especially the Monarchic form, but not anymore. I have come to "accept" Democracy and the political freedoms that come with it. The social structure is still a necessity what I basically want is a more inclusive, less racist/sexist 1950's culture.

Basically you want a return to the Duplessis-era Quebec or Vichy France.

[HappyWarrior]

If we ever had an Atlasian monarchy, I wonder who would be our king? lol

[Alexander Hamilton]

If we ever had an Atlasian monarchy, I wonder who would be our king? lol

ilikeverin

[Vepres]

Though the Mideast is already proposing legislation in honor of Peter, which I support (not that it matters, it's not my region), I believe that he deserves national recognition. After all, he was an influential and positive force in this game.

Therefore, I believe a bill stating so much, and honoring him in some form, on the national level is in order.

[ilikeverin]

If we ever had an Atlasian monarchy, I wonder who would be our king? lol

ilikeverin

I mean, um, noooooo, no, that's bad, um, no.

Hereditary Archmarquess-in-Chief, plz

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

So, you support an authoritarian regime?

I used to especially the Monarchic form, but not anymore. I have come to "accept" Democracy and the political freedoms that come with it. The social structure is still a necessity what I basically want is a more inclusive, less racist/sexist 1950's culture.

Basically you want a return to the Duplessis-era Quebec or Vichy France.

Not Vichy, and I am not familiar with Quebec to say either way. What I will say is there was once a time when I had an affinity for the Consitutional type Monachy of Louis-Phillipe from 1830-1848.

[Хahar 🤔]

So, you support an authoritarian regime?

I used to especially the Monarchic form, but not anymore. I have come to "accept" Democracy and the political freedoms that come with it. The social structure is still a necessity what I basically want is a more inclusive, less racist/sexist 1950's culture.

Basically you want a return to the Duplessis-era Quebec or Vichy France.

Not Vichy, and I am not familiar with Quebec to say either way. What I will say is there was once a time when I had an affinity for the Consitutional type Monachy of Louis-Phillipe from 1830-1848.

Vichy was an Orléanist monarchy without a monarch.

[Hash]

So, you support an authoritarian regime?

I used to especially the Monarchic form, but not anymore. I have come to "accept" Democracy and the political freedoms that come with it. The social structure is still a necessity what I basically want is a more inclusive, less racist/sexist 1950's culture.

Basically you want a return to the Duplessis-era Quebec or Vichy France.

Not Vichy, and I am not familiar with Quebec to say either way. What I will say is there was once a time when I had an affinity for the Consitutional type Monachy of Louis-Phillipe from 1830-1848.

Your rhetoric is extremely close to travail, famille, patrie.

And what Xahar said.

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

So, you support an authoritarian regime?

I used to especially the Monarchic form, but not anymore. I have come to "accept" Democracy and the political freedoms that come with it. The social structure is still a necessity what I basically want is a more inclusive, less racist/sexist 1950's culture.

Basically you want a return to the Duplessis-era Quebec or Vichy France.

Not Vichy, and I am not familiar with Quebec to say either way. What I will say is there was once a time when I had an affinity for the Consitutional type Monachy of Louis-Phillipe from 1830-1848.

Your rhetoric is extremely close to travail, famille, patrie.

And what Xahar said.

Notice the key word is "I had" and not the present tense "I have".

I never thought of Vichy as Orleanist, primarily cause I thought of them as facists but I guess they could both come together in one gov't. This discussion is however more appropriate for the History board and not fanasty elections.

[Хahar 🤔]

French fascism was particularly French, and not a German import. Action Française and the like supported (and still support) the Orléanist monarchy. I don't believe there have been any legitimists in the last century.

Why not have a historical discussion here? It raises the quality of the board.

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

French fascism was particularly French, and not a German import. Action Française and the like supported (and still support) the Orléanist monarchy. I don't believe there have been any legitimists in the last century.

Why not have a historical discussion here? It raises the quality of the board.

Well there are still a small fragrement of the already small group that is French Monarchists that adhere to the Carlists of Spain as the Legitimate heirs to the non-existant throne. Don't know of any be name though. I never really became familiar with French Facism I guess and always assumed it was just brought in by the Germans during Vichy with only small involvement by the Monarchists in that.

[Marokai Backbeat]

Ladies and gentlemen, a message from your PPT... The Bow Chicka Bow Wow bill has passed

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

Ladies and gentlemen, a message from your PPT... The Bow Chicka Bow Wow bill has passed

God forgive them, they know not what they did.

[Marokai Backbeat]

Ladies and gentlemen, a message from your PPT... The Bow Chicka Bow Wow bill has passed

God forgive them, they know not what they did.

It's a great victory for freedom, my friend.

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

Ladies and gentlemen, a message from your PPT... The Bow Chicka Bow Wow bill has passed

God forgive them, they know not what they did.

It's a great victory for freedom, my friend.

and one more defeat for a culture that isn't a septic tank.

[Marokai Backbeat]

Ladies and gentlemen, a message from your PPT... The Bow Chicka Bow Wow bill has passed

God forgive them, they know not what they did.

It's a great victory for freedom, my friend.

and one more defeat for a culture that isn't a septic tank.

Three is a charm
Two is not the same
I don’t see the harm
So are you game?

Lets’ make a team
Make ‘em say my name
Lovin’ the extreme
Now are you game?

Are – you in
Livin’ in sin is the new thing (yeah!)