1996: Clinton/Gore vs. McCain/Gramm
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 01:43:36 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  1996: Clinton/Gore vs. McCain/Gramm		 « previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 1996: Clinton/Gore vs. McCain/Gramm  (Read 781 times)
retromike22
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,457
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 13, 2009, 06:46:42 PM »
Let's say Bob Dole does not run in 1996, and instead John McCain chooses to run that year instead of waiting for 2000.  McCain sees a problem with a lack of conservative enthusiasm for his campaign so he asks Senator Phil Gramm of Texas to be his running mate.  What would the map look like?  Here is my guess:
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 15, 2009, 08:42:55 AM »
McCain surely would run better campaign than Dole did, but Clinton was popular enough to beat any Republican challenger.

He could pick-up NH, NV , NM and defend Arizona, but maybe not pick up Florida.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 18, 2009, 01:56:35 PM »
A 330-208 Clinton win:
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 12 queries.