Which state is most likely to change from the party it voted for in 2000?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 11:15:00 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  Which state is most likely to change from the party it voted for in 2000?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which state is most likely to change from the party it voted for in 2000?
#1
New Hampshire
 
#2
New Mexico
 
#3
Iowa
 
#4
Ohio
 
#5
Pennslyvania
 
#6
Wisconsin
 
#7
Other
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 27

Author Topic: Which state is most likely to change from the party it voted for in 2000?  (Read 1188 times)
MissCatholic
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,424


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 12, 2005, 12:33:44 PM »

I'm going for Iowa. I think Iowa will vote democrat in 2008. Incumbents have an effect on how states vote and i think if feingold or warner wins then they will win Iowa before ohio
Logged
TheresNoMoney
Scoonie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,907


Political Matrix
E: -3.25, S: -2.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 12, 2005, 12:37:49 PM »

I'll say New Mexico (Bush only won by about 6,000 votes there in 2004).
Logged
nini2287
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,616


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 12, 2005, 12:42:54 PM »

NH it already changed once and if socialissues continue to play an ever increasing part of politics, it will stay Democrat.
Logged
TheresNoMoney
Scoonie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,907


Political Matrix
E: -3.25, S: -2.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 12, 2005, 12:44:59 PM »

I agree that my home state is trending blue. It is a socially liberal state.

Only a John McCain or Rudy Guiliani would have a chance here in 2008.
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 12, 2005, 02:45:27 PM »

New Mexico
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,773
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 12, 2005, 03:18:54 PM »

I voted Iowa but it's that and New Mexico.

But that also depends on who the nominee is. If the Reps have McCain more than likely a lot more states will fall to him.
Logged
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,700
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 12, 2005, 03:34:05 PM »

Wisconsin
Logged
MaC
Milk_and_cereal
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,787


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 12, 2005, 04:08:03 PM »

I'm going for Iowa. I think Iowa will vote democrat in 2008. Incumbents have an effect on how states vote and i think if feingold or warner wins then they will win Iowa before ohio

uh, Iowa did vote Dem in 2000.
Logged
MaC
Milk_and_cereal
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,787


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 12, 2005, 04:13:06 PM »

surprized you didn't put Florida in there, it was close both elections.  Anyways, the big swing state that will go GOP by a slight margin will be Pennsylvania, then Michigan.  Meanwhile Democrats will tap the shallow south (Arkansas, Missouri, Kentucky), possibly win back WV, and might have a shot at Nevada.  Florida will still be a major player in the next several elections.  May flip for Dems once.  New Hampshire will vote GOP once more before it's indistinguishable from the rest of New England...
Logged
Blank Slate
Rookie
**
Posts: 137


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 12, 2005, 09:58:50 PM »
« Edited: October 12, 2005, 10:01:54 PM by Blank Slate »

Well I agree it all depends on who wins the nominations in either party.  I myself voted for New Mexico, but agreed it depends on the GOP side if say the nominee is McCain or not.  If either Napolitano (AZ) or Richardson (NM) is on the Democratic ticket than New Mexico could go back decivisely for the Democrats (although more likely if Richardson is the Democratic Presidential nominee).

Other states close for both parties that could switch from 2004, depending on circumstances (in no particular order):

Democrat to Republican, going west to east:

Hawaii (yes, Hawaii would depend on who is on the tickets and issues going on at that time; this state was closer for Kerry then it should have been and it does have a GOP governor)
Washington
Oregon
Minnesota
Wisconsin
Pennsylvania
New Hampshire

Republican to Democrat, going east to west:

Virginia
West Virginia (although I'm concerned as a Democrat this may have fallen into the GOP column for good or at least for the forseeable future)
Ohio
Tennessee (it might depend on what happens to Bredesen & the U.S. Senate race in '06 especially with Ford)
Florida
Iowa
Missouri
Arkansas
Louisiana
Colorado
New Mexico
Montana
Nevada
 

 
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 13, 2005, 04:02:41 AM »

Ohio, Iowa, and Nevada are all exceedingly likely to switch parties in 2008.

Also if you are talking switching from 2000 and not 2004, New Hampshire is virtually certain to switch as it should now be a reliably Democrat state.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.233 seconds with 13 queries.