Opinion of Gothic architecture
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 05:49:21 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Off-topic Board (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, The Mikado, YE)
  Opinion of Gothic architecture
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Opinion of Gothic architecture
#1
Freedom architecture
 
#2
Horrible architecture
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 19

Author Topic: Opinion of Gothic architecture  (Read 423 times)
Old Man Willow
ShadowOfTheWave
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,698
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 29, 2017, 11:54:52 PM »

I think it's the best. Other styles are dull in comparison.
Logged
nicholas.slaydon
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,095
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 30, 2017, 12:26:04 AM »

Freedom Architecture, but not even half as great as Baroque.
Logged
Lechasseur
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,800


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: 3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 30, 2017, 01:51:00 AM »

I think it's the best. Other styles are dull in comparison.
Logged
vanguard96
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 754
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 31, 2017, 02:15:14 PM »

I prefer modernist styles to gothic - 1920's seemed to be an extremely fertile period notably in Germany, France, and the Benelux countries but also in the US. The latter period flourished in the 1950's and 1960's including many executions in Brazil and even Japan.

Le Corbusier and Frank Lloyd Wright are the titans of the style - that I think I've always appreciated and only have just begun to scratch the surface on.



Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 01, 2017, 01:56:51 AM »

Modernist architecture is like candy, sweet but ultimately not good for you. It generally looks good, but in execution it generally proves impractical. Wright's buildings generally are maintenance nightmares while Le Corbusier's delusions about how to design cities that generally ignored how people live are thankfully no longer influential.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,101
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 01, 2017, 06:38:04 AM »
« Edited: November 01, 2017, 06:39:53 AM by Torie »

The correct answer, as is the case with so many architectural styles, is that it all depends on the execution (e.g., getting the proportions right). For example, how many of you think this house is anything other than hideously ugly? When I drive by it, which I do often, I avert my eyes.
Logged
vanguard96
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 754
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 01, 2017, 10:16:43 AM »

Modernist architecture is like candy, sweet but ultimately not good for you. It generally looks good, but in execution it generally proves impractical. Wright's buildings generally are maintenance nightmares while Le Corbusier's delusions about how to design cities that generally ignored how people live are thankfully no longer influential.

It's not really about that for me. More a place to see rather than live in. Most are either museums or public buildings or a few are kept as preserved historic sites. Many are best seen in old movies, TV, and photos. In a number of ways I consider myself a retro futurist fan in terms of what I appreciate with architecture, art, film, music, design, graphics, and so on.

I am happy my wife likes some aspects of mid-century modern style with our home interior. So many of the pieces are exorbitantly expense but they are miles better looking than rustic antiques from our sensibilities.

The central planning aspects of the style with Corb, Bauhaus, the Brazilians, and the Soviet / Eastern European Expressionist and Brutalist styles are a concern obviously but that does not take away from my personal taste for this period.

Don't get me wrong I don't dislike Art Deco or 19th century such as Crystal Palace, Eiffel Tower which have both neoclassical and gothic aspects in them. Some newer architecture is very nice and more functional. Others I find as distracting.

I am also a fan of 1960's and early 1970's wedge cars from design houses such as Bertone, Ital Design, Ghia, and Pinifarina. The green 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo by Bertone, my personal favorite, is a classic example of this. It is a purely aesthetic, not-necessarily practical appreciation that only a select number of Americans enjoy who typically go for the big American performance cars of the time as their showpieces. It is not feasible for me to own this car - at all - I would not be able to do so it is a super rare museum piece. Many times you will find a picture of these cars in front of some modernist event hall with a model in a futuristic outfit. A few aspects of the Lamborghini Countach and Lotus Esprit were conceived in these cars - how practical are they? Not very. But are they eye candy - yes!!!

I also like a lot of 1960's and 1970's garish interiors - with the clashing colors - brown and yellow. Geodesic designs. Watch a giallo movie or look at some old home interior magazines and you may see what I am talking about - it is about an unspoiled image of the future when so many new ideas seemed feasible and worth trying even if they looked outlandish.

Many, many of the ideas failed miserably when executed. For instance Montreal's Olympic stadium roof was not practical to be opened and closed regularly so they kept it closed. So many of the outlandish race car designs of the 60 & 70's aerodynamically are terrible compared to nowadays or had other issues with tire development or visibility that were not fully realized. Most of the interiors were hard to maintain, had poor 'feng sui' and flow, and hard to heat and cool effectively. They mostly ended up being refurbished or ending up in some derelict mall or project that is waiting demolition.

Logged
vanguard96
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 754
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 01, 2017, 10:22:10 AM »

The correct answer, as is the case with so many architectural styles, is that it all depends on the execution (e.g., getting the proportions right). For example, how many of you think this house is anything other than hideously ugly? When I drive by it, which I do often, I avert my eyes.

I don't care for the three pointed roofs and the green is a not a pleasing shade.
I personally do not like the Tudor trims on houses or neoclassical style columns on a wooden home. I see those a lot and generally it is a minus point when looking for a home.

Again my modernist taste is limited to museum pieces and old movies / TV and some mild interior aspects of it. I think it is impractical but Falling Water for instance is amazing.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 02, 2017, 08:36:45 PM »

The correct answer, as is the case with so many architectural styles, is that it all depends on the execution (e.g., getting the proportions right). For example, how many of you think this house is anything other than hideously ugly? When I drive by it, which I do often, I avert my eyes.

It's only serious flaw in my eyes is the flawed choice of a color palette. It does appear that the conversion of that large house into a duplex was somewhat botched.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.233 seconds with 12 queries.