To all Bernie supporters here, who will you vote for in November?

[°Leprechaun]

Depends on who Clinton and Trump pick as their VPs

Anybody who is claiming that the VP choice matters in this, assuming s/he has a minimal understanding of US government, is confessing that s/he is thinking in terms of an assassination. And you were saying something about Mexican violence?

I disagree, that person could be a favored candidate in future elections.
The POTUS could die without being murdered.

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

Depends on who Clinton and Trump pick as their VPs

Anybody who is claiming that the VP choice matters in this, assuming s/he has a minimal understanding of US government, is confessing that s/he is thinking in terms of an assassination. And you were saying something about Mexican violence?

What Mexican violence? The last presidential assassination in Mexico was in 1928. The last presidential assassination in the U.S. was in 1963.

Which means Mexico is 35 years ahead of the U.S. in humanitarian treatment of their heads of state.

[Beefalow and the Consumer]

Depends on who Clinton and Trump pick as their VPs

Anybody who is claiming that the VP choice matters in this, assuming s/he has a minimal understanding of US government, is confessing that s/he is thinking in terms of an assassination. And you were saying something about Mexican violence?

Not at all.  They could be thinking in terms of:

1. A Clinton indictment
2. Trump getting bored and quitting mid-term

1. It would have to be impeachment, not indictment.
2. Yeah, that could happen. He does appear a bit like Santa Ana - just with less style.

1. I say "indictment" because it also covers it occurring before she takes office, before the electors cast their votes, before election day, etc.  There are 1000 scenarios, but the identity of the VP-elect becomes extremely important in all of them.

Note: Hillary Clinton will not be indicted, nor impeached.

[Catholics vs. Convicts]

Even one vote for trump in this poll is too many.

[pbrower2a]

My preferences for President were:

1. Sanders
2. Clinton
3. Kasich
4. another country.

Voting for a third-party nominee would be a waste of my vote. Hillary Clinton is definitely ready to be President; Donald Trump is a crass, dangerous demagogue. Whether delusional or deliberately deceitful matters not; he will disappoint people who find that the promise that he keeps to someone else will be opposite the promise that one thought one had.

 

[Famous Mortimer]

If Trump picks LePage or Rick Scott as his VP, that says a lot about how he would govern and I won't vote for him then.

If he picks Rob Portman, that says a whole different thing.

[ag]

If Trump picks LePage or Rick Scott as his VP, that says a lot about how he would govern

Actually, it says nothing about it whatsoever.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Hillary

[dspNY]

Depends on who Clinton and Trump pick as their VPs and how far they pivot to the left, if they pivot to the left at all. At this point I'm leaning towards voting for Trump, since he seems like the most anti-capitalist of the two. I could see myself voting for either, or possible for the Socialist Equality Party, my Trot party of choice, if both find a way to alienate me.

The billionaire capitalist is anti-capitalist? Trump is the definition of cannibal capitalism