Is being anti-gay marriage now unacceptable for a national Democratic candidate?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 11:02:48 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Is being anti-gay marriage now unacceptable for a national Democratic candidate?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]
Poll
Question: So?
#1
Yes
#2
No
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results


Author Topic: Is being anti-gay marriage now unacceptable for a national Democratic candidate?  (Read 6754 times)
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #50 on: September 18, 2013, 06:06:11 PM »

No civil unions is the moderate position.  But most Americans are liberal on the issue, myself included
Logged
milhouse24
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,331
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #51 on: September 18, 2013, 06:11:39 PM »

Senator Casey is screwed - primary that sucker.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #52 on: September 18, 2013, 06:34:46 PM »

Senator Casey is screwed - primary that sucker.

Of course Democrats won't.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,317


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #53 on: September 18, 2013, 07:19:59 PM »

Of course it is. They continue to purge moderates.

...you're kidding, right? The Democratic Party is center-right by every meaningful definition and has been since Clinton's policy of triangulation at home and imperialism abroad.

Yeah for real. The Republican one is the one purging moderates.

Phil is just trolling like usual.

Purists:

Yes. I would certainly oppose them in the primary for this reason alone, and consider voting third party if they somehow got the nomination.

Opposing gay marriages is just a bigoted position. Opposing someone with those views is different from launching primary challenges against anyone who dares to work with a President who is of the opposite political party. Those sorts of frivolous challenges happen much more frequently in the Republican party as opposed to the Democratic party.

Predictably, purism is only bad when the side you despise practices it.

If a right winger believes that abortion is the taking of an innocent life and wants a Pro Choice Republican defeated, you'd cry about ridiculous litmus tests. I'm supposed to respect your opinion that ousting someone because of one issue is acceptable but you can't wrap your mind around when Republicans do it on any issue, right?

Actually that would be the only issue I can respect it on. Of course if said challenger also has interesting views on rape.....
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #54 on: September 18, 2013, 09:29:06 PM »


He likely won't be running in 2018. He certainly won't be if there is an open Gubernatorial race.


Convincing point. Changing my mind now.
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,772
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #55 on: September 18, 2013, 10:10:18 PM »

I didn't try to convince you of anything, but I'm glad my powers of persuasion are so powerful. Whatever it was.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #56 on: September 19, 2013, 10:25:26 AM »


He likely won't be running in 2018. He certainly won't be if there is an open Gubernatorial race. 

Either Casey will change his view point or not. Either way, even in 2018, Democrats will still be like BUT WE NEED PEOPLE LIKE CASEY TO WIIIIIN.

Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,545
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #57 on: September 19, 2013, 10:35:43 AM »


What are we talking about? Casey endorsed his support for SSM when everyone else was:

http://articles.mcall.com/2013-04-01/news/mc-pa-bob-casey-support-gay-marriage-20130401_1_gay-marriage-marriage-equality-marriage-act[/url]
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #58 on: September 19, 2013, 11:42:55 AM »

Ah I forgot he had. I assumed he was playing to some imaginary electorate.
Logged
Ogre Mage
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,500
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.39, S: -5.22

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #59 on: September 19, 2013, 02:21:22 PM »

I am proud that in the Democratic Party we are now pushing for full equality.  And I cannot imagine the 2016 Democratic nominee opposing same-sex marriage.  Every single rumored 2016 candidate:  Clinton, Biden, Cuomo, Warren, O'Malley, Gillibrand, etc. all support same-sex marriage.  That's not a coincidence.

Given as the Democratic Party is capitalist, this is blatantly dishonest.

Marriage equality is the topic of this thread, not capitalism.
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,421
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #60 on: September 20, 2013, 04:53:17 PM »

Of course it is. They continue to purge moderates.

...you're kidding, right? The Democratic Party is center-right by every meaningful definition and has been since Clinton's policy of triangulation at home and imperialism abroad.

Yeah for real. The Republican one is the one purging moderates.

Phil is just trolling like usual.

No, I think he believes it.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.234 seconds with 14 queries.