Assertions about the Iowa caucuses
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 12:09:04 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Assertions about the Iowa caucuses		 « previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which of the following 12 statements are likely to be applicable to the Iowa caucus results?
#1
A
#2
B
#3
C
#4
D
#5
E
#6
F
#7
G
#8
H
#9
I
#10
J
#11
K
#12
L
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Author Topic: Assertions about the Iowa caucuses  (Read 526 times)
Adele is pudgy!
necrophiliac
Rookie
**
Posts: 66
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 26, 2011, 07:52:59 PM »
A) The winner will have received more than 25% of the votes.

B) Each of the big seven1) will get more than 5% of the votes.

C) The popular vote winner will not have received the most delegates.

D) In at least 1 county uncommitted voters will be in majority.

E) There's at least one member of the big seven whose received votes are lower in number than the uncommitted voters.

F) As many as one rank outsider (≠ Ron Paul !!!) will do better than at least one member of the big seven.

G) Each of the big seven will win at least one county.

H) None of the big seven is going to drop out subsequent to the Iowa caucus.

I) The winner of the Iowa caucus will not win another state.

J) The winner of the Iowa caucus will be the winner of the New Hampshire primary.

K) The Iowa winner will become the Republican nominee for President.

L) Obama will face a sobering poll result in the Democratic equivalent2).


You can choose up to 11 of the 12 statement (since clicking on both I and J doesn't really make sense.)

*1) The big seven consist of: Bachmann, Gingrich, Huntsman, Paul, Perry, Romney and Santorum.

*2) A - K concern the Republican caucus.
Logged
Snowstalker Mk. II
Snowstalker
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,414
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -4.35

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 26, 2011, 08:06:06 PM »
Only A and K; Huntsman isn't competing and won't get more than 1% or so.
Logged
TheGlobalizer
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,286
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.84, S: -7.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 26, 2011, 08:54:57 PM »
Quote from: Northeast Governor Snowstalker on December 26, 2011, 08:06:06 PM
Only A and K; Huntsman isn't competing and won't get more than 1% or so.
Logged
Snowstalker Mk. II
Snowstalker
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,414
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -4.35

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 26, 2011, 09:11:08 PM »
Wait, I meant E, not K. Tongue
Logged
billbillerson
Eversole
Rookie
**
Posts: 95
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 26, 2011, 09:24:51 PM »
j, k
Logged
Adele is pudgy!
necrophiliac
Rookie
**
Posts: 66
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: December 27, 2011, 07:16:25 PM »
Do y'all really think that it is possible to win more than one-fourth of all votes at the Iowa caucus?  Shocked
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.208 seconds with 14 queries.