Next Pres. dies, Which VP for war on terror
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 29, 2024, 03:47:17 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election
  Next Pres. dies, Which VP for war on terror
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which VP tonight would you feel more secure leading war on terror?
#1
Cheney
 
#2
Edwards
 
#3
Either One
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 36

Author Topic: Next Pres. dies, Which VP for war on terror  (Read 759 times)
Pollwatch99
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 549


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 05, 2004, 10:01:20 PM »

That's the test of this election
Logged
Giant Saguaro
TheGiantSaguaro
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,903


Political Matrix
E: 2.58, S: 3.83

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 05, 2004, 10:02:57 PM »

Cheney
Cheney
Cheney

In case I forgot... Cheney. Smiley
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 05, 2004, 10:04:11 PM »

Definately Cheney. Edwards is more of a Domestic guy, what really shocked me was his dependence on "Senator Kerry will..." even on the question "What would you do if you were President?" he kept having to correct himself for saying "Senator Kerry will..."
Logged
agcatter
agcat
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,740


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 05, 2004, 10:08:01 PM »

Depends.  If we want to kill terrorists, Cheney no question.  However, if we decide to sue them instead, have to go with Edwards.
Logged
Blue Rectangle
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,683


Political Matrix
E: 8.50, S: -0.62

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 05, 2004, 10:08:46 PM »

If the war on terror can be fought with civil suits, then Edwards by a mile.

Edit:
Depends.  If we want to kill terrorists, Cheney no question.  However, if we decide to sue them instead, have to go with Edwards.
Bah! You beat me to it by a hair!
Logged
Beefalow and the Consumer
Beef
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,123
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.77, S: -8.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 05, 2004, 10:34:13 PM »

Cheney would not hesitate to push the Red Button, if it came to that.

When it comes to kicking serious butt, I'd take the Evil Genius over the Sunny Gentleman any day.
Logged
Volrath50
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 814
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -3.35, S: -5.57

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 05, 2004, 10:48:44 PM »

Cheney. And I'm no fan of Republicans. Edwards just seems too.... nice. And smiley.
Logged
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 05, 2004, 11:33:28 PM »

Edwards wouldn't be able to make intelligent decisions and Cheney would be extremely scary..aaaghh

Whatever, Edwards.  Hope he hires good people for his advisors.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 05, 2004, 11:36:34 PM »

My ranking of the candidates overall quality, not just on the terror issue.

1) Cheney
2) Kerry
3) Bush
4) Edwards
Logged
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 05, 2004, 11:42:34 PM »

My ranking of the candidates overall quality, not just on the terror issue.

1) Cheney
2) Kerry
3) Bush
4) Edwards

Cheney is a foreign policy man.  Specifically, a scary foreign policy man.  I see why you support him.  Bush is much less, and then he has all of the social issues that you disagree with him on, makes sense.
Logged
cwelsch
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 677


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 06, 2004, 12:45:49 AM »

Clearly Cheney.  Knowledgeable, direct, simple, intelligent, dedicated, strong.  I also don't buy into the war profiteering stuff, that's utterly unsubstantiated garbage.

But then I like Cheney better than the other three jokers in general.  Kerry is always trying to lie or weasel into or out of something, Edwards tries too hard to be nice, Bush I'd say is prety good but he doesn't have the mannerisms Cheney does.  Cheney is not a great politician, but he is a very cool guy and an excellent policy-maker.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,859


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 06, 2004, 01:37:38 AM »

Edwards would do fine.  He'd have plenty of people with foreign policy experience on board: Clinton, Albright, Holbrook....
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.218 seconds with 13 queries.