Paul V. Clinton
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 15, 2024, 01:58:20 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  Paul V. Clinton		 « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Poll
Question: who would you vote for/who would win?
#1
Paul/Paul		  
#2
Paul/Clinton		  
#3
Clinton/Clinton		  
#4
Clinton/Paul		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 49

Author Topic: Paul V. Clinton  (Read 3907 times)
Governor PiT
Robert Stark
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,631
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: -0.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: September 03, 2007, 04:19:56 PM »
Paul is the only republican who can win in the general election because of the war.
Logged
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: September 03, 2007, 04:20:43 PM »
I would vote for Paul, but Clinton would win quite handily.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: September 03, 2007, 04:23:22 PM »
Logged
ag
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,828


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: September 03, 2007, 07:19:36 PM »
Quote from: Lou Dobbs08 on September 03, 2007, 04:19:56 PM
Paul is the only republican who can win in the general election because of the war.

Paul cannot win election for most other reasons. Conclusion (if I am to believe you): no Republican can win (actually, not true, though Paul definitely can't win).
Logged
Undisguised Sockpuppet
Straha
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,787
Uruguay


Political Matrix
E: 6.52, S: 2.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: September 03, 2007, 07:20:49 PM »
Ron Paul is merely crazy not evil like the rest of the GOP
Logged
Know Your Rights!
ABAsite
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 481
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: September 04, 2007, 05:54:43 PM »
Paul, but he would lose.
Logged
Josh/Devilman88
josh4bush
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,079
Political Matrix
E: 3.61, S: -1.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: September 04, 2007, 06:41:37 PM »
Logged
angus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,424
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: September 05, 2007, 10:33:12 AM »
I'd vote for Ron Paul, but Hillary Clinton has the sort of name recognition that being married to a former president gives.  And don't underestimate the power of the almighty dollar in campaigns.  She beats Ron Paul in fundraising as well.  Maybe not for the right reasons, but she'd handily defeat Ron Paul.
Logged
Boris
boris78
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,098
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -1.55, S: -4.52

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: September 05, 2007, 02:59:57 PM »
Clinton would rape Paul (there's some...interesting imagery for you). I'd write in something stupid like Bejamin Netanyahu or Teemu Selanne or somethng.
Logged
Democratic Hawk
LucysBeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,703
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: 2.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: September 05, 2007, 04:46:30 PM »
Quote from: Lou Dobbs08 on September 03, 2007, 04:19:56 PM
Paul is the only republican who can win in the general election because of the war.

As much as I'd love the Republicans to nominate Paul, if he is indeed their only chance , it ain't going to happen Sad

Clinton soundly defeats Paul. She's the realist in this race. Erect an Ivory Tower and let Paul rule that

Dave
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,055
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: September 05, 2007, 04:58:16 PM »

HP
Logged
DanielX
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,126
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: September 05, 2007, 05:15:14 PM »
Paul/Clinton. Sadly, advocating government restraint (or having principles) never got a candidate anywhere when running for high political office.
Logged
NDN
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,495
Uganda


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: September 06, 2007, 05:09:12 PM »
Quote from: DanielX on September 05, 2007, 05:15:14 PM
Paul/Clinton. Sadly, advocating government restraint (or having principles) never got a candidate anywhere when running for high political office.
Not true, look at the success of Ronald Reagan in 1980 (though his record turned out to be quite different) and the GOP in 1994. Both campaigned on a "government is the problem" platform and won.
Logged
Rob
Bob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,277
United States
Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -9.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: September 06, 2007, 05:16:25 PM »
Clinton/Clinton, in a serious asskicking.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.234 seconds with 13 queries.