Once again, red avatars mischaracterize to score cheap points. Transporting a minor across state boundaries for the purpose of receiving medical treatment w/o parental consent should be illegal. Who disagrees?
In some circumstances I would disagree, such as an abortion, chemotherapy, surgery to remove a foreign object, etc etc.
Yes but it’s not the same thing as the video you guys are claiming has come true .
Allowing people to transport minors across state lines for medical treatment their parents know nothing of and/or do not approve of is a frontal assault on the institution of the family.
I can see parents being forced, against their will, to consent to (and even pay for) needed medical treatment for a child that they are withholding for stupid reasons. An abortion is not one of those.
You are literally advocating for a woman's freedom of movement to be suspended because she might want to get an abortion.
My grandchild who was aborted would be 20 now. If that grandchild were now an alive adult, he/she could have weighed in on that.
I'm advocating for the lives of unborn children who are at a stage of human life you and I were once at. Innocent children whose blood is innocent blood.
So you support suspending people's freedom of movement.
