If Trump signs up for Parler...

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Absolutely. My goal will be to the new Krassenstein and replies to every single one of his "parleys" (what they call posts instead of tweets.) I bet thousands of others will too for solely this reason.

[If my soul was made of stone]

Being on Parler probably puts you on countless FBI/NSA watchlists, so I'd much rather not.

[brucejoel99]

Not only did he just announce literally today that he'll be starting up his own social media platform (so, pretty categorically not joining Parler, especially given the fact that his aides had to prevent him from doing so 2 months ago), but the USDG post about that news was posted therein before you even thought to post this here, so the question has to be asked: do you just keep posting nonsensical, useless threads seemingly for the sole purpose of upping your post count &, if so, why?

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Not only did he just announce literally today that he'll be starting up his own social media platform (so, pretty categorically not joining Parler, especially given the fact that his aides had to prevent him from doing so 2 months ago), but the USDG post about that news was posted therein before you even thought to post this here, so the question has to be asked: do you just keep posting nonsensical, useless threads seemingly for the sole purpose of upping your post count &, if so, why?

Believe it or not, I do not read every single thread posted.

The question though could just as easily apply to his new network though.

[Boobs]

I'm sorry, who is "Trump"?

[brucejoel99]

Not only did he just announce literally today that he'll be starting up his own social media platform (so, pretty categorically not joining Parler, especially given the fact that his aides had to prevent him from doing so 2 months ago), but the USDG post about that news was posted therein before you even thought to post this here, so the question has to be asked: do you just keep posting nonsensical, useless threads seemingly for the sole purpose of upping your post count &, if so, why?

Believe it or not, I do not read every single thread posted.

The question though could just as easily apply to his new network though.

Really? Because it seems like you post a good quarter of them.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Not only did he just announce literally today that he'll be starting up his own social media platform (so, pretty categorically not joining Parler, especially given the fact that his aides had to prevent him from doing so 2 months ago), but the USDG post about that news was posted therein before you even thought to post this here, so the question has to be asked: do you just keep posting nonsensical, useless threads seemingly for the sole purpose of upping your post count &, if so, why?

Believe it or not, I do not read every single thread posted.

The question though could just as easily apply to his new network though.

Really? Because it seems like you post a good quarter of them.

I count 29 threads on the front page of USGD (not counting the pinned ones.) I have posted three. 3/29 < 25% by a lot.

[brucejoel99]

Not only did he just announce literally today that he'll be starting up his own social media platform (so, pretty categorically not joining Parler, especially given the fact that his aides had to prevent him from doing so 2 months ago), but the USDG post about that news was posted therein before you even thought to post this here, so the question has to be asked: do you just keep posting nonsensical, useless threads seemingly for the sole purpose of upping your post count &, if so, why?

Believe it or not, I do not read every single thread posted.

The question though could just as easily apply to his new network though.

Really? Because it seems like you post a good quarter of them.

I count 29 threads on the front page of USGD (not counting the pinned ones.) I have posted three. 3/29 < 25% by a lot.

I count 11,780 topics started by you among the top 10 topic starters in Atlas history's 49,003 combined started topics. Of significant topic starters, you've posted 24.04% of said topics. In tandem with the fact that you're 30K ahead of the runner-up among the top 10 posters in site history, Idk man, seemingly upping your post count by as much as humanly possible just seems like a bit of an unhealthy obsession on your part at this point.

[bagelman]

I thought Parler was deleted.

[DINGO Joe]

I think the bigger question is, "Will the Krassensteins come out of retirement and join Parler"?

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

I think the bigger question is, "Will the Krassensteins come out of retirement and join Parler"?

Already have:
https://twitter.com/TheLaurenChen/status/1276177949880967169

[DINGO Joe]

I think the bigger question is, "Will the Krassensteins come out of retirement and join Parler"?

Already have:
https://twitter.com/TheLaurenChen/status/1276177949880967169

Well then, your dream is over before it even started.

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

I think the bigger question is, "Will the Krassensteins come out of retirement and join Parler"?

Already have:
https://twitter.com/TheLaurenChen/status/1276177949880967169

Why does Brian get to just be @Krassenstein while Ed has to distinguish with his first name?

[Diabolical Materialism]

What does being a snarky Trump reply-guy accomplish

[Santander]

Why does Brian get to just be @Krassenstein while Ed has to distinguish with his first name?

Brian's middle name is Chad.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

I think the bigger question is, "Will the Krassensteins come out of retirement and join Parler"?

Already have:
https://twitter.com/TheLaurenChen/status/1276177949880967169

Why does Brian get to just be @Krassenstein while Ed has to distinguish with his first name?

I believe that Brian signed up for Twitter first.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

What does being a snarky Trump reply-guy accomplish

The satisfaction of repeatedly owning Trump.

[Diabolical Materialism]

What does being a snarky Trump reply-guy accomplish

The satisfaction of repeatedly owning Trump.

That's cope

[brucejoel99]

What does being a snarky Trump reply-guy accomplish

The satisfaction of repeatedly owning Trump.

A sense of smug satisfaction in oneself isn't exactly a virtue, & certainly isn't something that anybody with a brain actually gives a sh*t about.

[If my soul was made of stone]

What does being a snarky Trump reply-guy accomplish

The satisfaction of repeatedly owning Trump.

Do you really have a vision of the man frantically combing through the snarky retorts of all his devoted reply guys, tearing out his hair and screeching at the individual witty brilliance of each one?

This sort of parasociality isn't healthy.

[President Johnson]

Absolutely not. Don't give him the attention he craves for. The worst thing for Donald Trump is irrelevance.