Pick your favorite tickets from Clark,H.Clinton, Edwards, Feingold, Gore, Warner
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 09:19:24 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  Pick your favorite tickets from Clark,H.Clinton, Edwards, Feingold, Gore, Warner		 « previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: President / Vice President?
#1
Clark / Clinton		  
#2
Clark / Edwards		  
#3
Clark / Feingold		  
#4
Clark / Gore		  
#5
Clark / Warner		  
#6
Clinton / Clark		  
#7
Clinton / Edwards		  
#8
Clinton / Feingold		  
#9
Clinton / Gore		  
#10
Clinton / Warner		  
#11
Edwards / Clark		  
#12
Edwards / Clinton		  
#13
Edwards / Feingold		  
#14
Edwards / Gore		  
#15
Edwards / Warner		  
#16
Feingold / Clark		  
#17
Feingold / Clinton		  
#18
Feingold / Edwards		  
#19
Feingold / Gore		  
#20
Feingold / Warner		  
#21
Gore / Clark		  
#22
Gore / Clinton		  
#23
Gore / Edwards		  
#24
Gore / Feingold		  
#25
Gore / Warner		  
#26
Warner / Clark		  
#27
Warner / Clinton		  
#28
Warner / Edwards		  
#29
Warner / Feingold		  
#30
Warner / Gore		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 27

Calculate results by number of options selected
Author Topic: Pick your favorite tickets from Clark,H.Clinton, Edwards, Feingold, Gore, Warner  (Read 1930 times)
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,879


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 03, 2005, 02:28:37 AM »
Choose ones you like and you think would do well in the general election.
Logged
ian
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,461


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: -1.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 03, 2005, 02:48:15 AM »
Edwards/Feingold and Feingold/Edwards

Edwards is southern, white, protestant, male, handsome, young, and charismatic--all the best qualities in a politician.  I suppose he's quite a bit more liberal than the rest of the country, but I think that he will be able to overcome that.
Feingold is very charismatic and an individual--he has proven time and again that he doesn't really care what others say; he does what he thinks is right.  Much more liberal than the rest of the country, but I think that his ability to emulate real person in the stead of politician paired with his charisma can really help him out in the general election.  Would also help out with the Jewish vote, I do believe.
Logged
Moooooo
nickshepDEM
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,909


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: 3.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 03, 2005, 07:41:41 AM »
Warner/Feingold or Feingold/Warner.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 03, 2005, 02:32:45 PM »
Feingold/Warner is the best ticket there.  The problem is, the Democrats lack a sure-fire good candidate for 2008.  Everyone has a drawback, or multiple drawbacks.  Al Gore might be the best option if he can successfully reinvent himself a third time.
Logged
jokerman
Cosmo Kramer
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,808
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 03, 2005, 03:43:43 PM »
Warner/Clark would make a good ticket.  Clark could make up for Warner's lack of national security and foreign policy creditials.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 03, 2005, 03:58:47 PM »
Quote from: Cosmo Kramer on October 03, 2005, 03:43:43 PM
Warner/Clark would make a good ticket.  Clark could make up for Warner's lack of national security and foreign policy creditials.

That ticket as a whole has *one* electoral victory under their belt(s).
Logged
TomC
TCash101
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,976


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 03, 2005, 05:01:52 PM »
1. Where's Bayh?
2. I don't think Gore is eligible to serve as VP anymore.
3. Absent Bayh, I vote Edwards. Feingold makes a nice vp pick.
Logged
skybridge
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,919
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 03, 2005, 05:04:39 PM »
I wonder about Bayh too. Feingold paired with either Clark or Gore sounds good.
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 03, 2005, 06:10:27 PM »
Feingold/Warner, Warner/Feingold, Gore/Warner, Gore/Feingold
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 03, 2005, 06:32:04 PM »
Quote from: TCash101 on October 03, 2005, 05:01:52 PM
2. I don't think Gore is eligible to serve as VP anymore.

I don't think there are term limits on Vice Presidents.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,879


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 03, 2005, 06:32:23 PM »
Quote from: Boss Tweed on October 03, 2005, 06:32:04 PM
Quote from: TCash101 on October 03, 2005, 05:01:52 PM
2. I don't think Gore is eligible to serve as VP anymore.

I don't think there are term limits on Vice Presidents.

Yes, he could be Vice President for another 40 years.
Logged
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,698
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 03, 2005, 09:33:51 PM »
Feingold/Warner, and Warner/Feingold.  I liked none of the others. 
Logged
Max Power
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,182
Political Matrix
E: 1.84, S: -8.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 03, 2005, 09:36:35 PM »
I don't care for any of them but Warner. If I was given the choice, Kerry/Warner.
Logged
DanielX
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,126
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 04, 2005, 07:47:58 PM »
As a non-Democrat:

In terms of ease of having the sh**t kicked out of them by the Republicans or maybe Libertarians? Gore/Edwards or Edwards/Gore.

In terms of relative palatablility? Warner/Feingold.
Logged
MaC
Milk_and_cereal
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,787


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: October 05, 2005, 01:05:51 AM »
out of those Warner and Edwards seem the least horrible, although I haven't heard much about them and that's why.
Logged
tarheel-leftist85
krustytheklown
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,274
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: October 05, 2005, 03:15:50 PM »
Warner/Gore
Logged
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: October 05, 2005, 05:01:34 PM »
allo f those choices are pretty horrible.

but ill say feingold/warner
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.247 seconds with 13 queries.