Is the feud with the Kahn family Trump's 47 %?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 09:58:44 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Is the feud with the Kahn family Trump's 47 %?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Poll
Question: Is the feud with the Kahn family Trump's 47 %?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 51

Author Topic: Is the feud with the Kahn family Trump's 47 %?  (Read 1918 times)
Stranger in a strange land
strangeland
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,209
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: August 04, 2016, 09:40:51 AM »

I initially thought he would coast through this, the way he has with everything else, but I've changed my view over the last few days, because this really does seem to have hurt him.

Having a Brown Pakistani-American Muslim Immigrant with a thick accent who knows more about being an American than Trump ever will bitch-slap him with the Constitution was a brilliant act of political theater, and would have been bad enough for him. But he made it much, much worse by personally attacking the Khan family, which was totally unnecessary. If he had just responded the way that Mike Pence did to the Air Force Mom at his rally the other day, the whole thing would have subsided and the media would have moved on to something else. But Trump's reply showed his pettiness, his callousness, his cruelty, his lack of empathy, his ingratitude, and his lack of understanding of true sacrifice. He could still pull it out if Hillary really messes up or if there's a major Wikileaks doc-drop the week before the election, but his chances of winning probably just went from around 40% to around 5-10%.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: August 05, 2016, 01:51:33 AM »

Even if you think it was classist to say or exposed how terrible the GOP is, Romney's comment was statistically true, and we all knew he (and just about every GOP nominee ever) believed that behind closed doors.  47% of the population benefits from increased government control of the economy, whether that'a those who work in public education, government employees, union members, welfare recipients or whomever.  Anyone who found that comment appalling was already voting Democrat for the exact reason Romney cited.

Trump just blatantly insulted an American hero's parents, the type of shlt I'd expect from the fringe left (though certainly from a different bent), not from the GOP.  Much worse.

Romney's problem was that he conflated the 47% of people who receive government assistance with the 47% of people who will "vote Democratic no matter what." Obviously that is not true, considering Democrats win places like Silicon Valley and NoVa while Republicans win places like Appalachia.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.217 seconds with 14 queries.