Democrat wave election?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 04, 2024, 10:35:24 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Democrat wave election?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]
Poll
Question: Will Democrats win big in next year's midterms?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 92

Author Topic: Democrat wave election?  (Read 3478 times)
here2view
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,693
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.13, S: -1.74

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #50 on: December 18, 2017, 09:51:50 AM »

I give Dems a 55% chance to win the House and a 40% chance to win the Senate. They should win 10-20 seats in the House, I just don't know if they win at least 24 (or whatever the number is) to obtain the majority.
Logged
Angrie
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 448


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #51 on: December 18, 2017, 02:22:43 PM »

What I don't really understand why anyone would view control of the Senate as likely to hinge on Missouri. McCaskill is a 2 term incumbent in what seems likely to be a very strong Democratic year.

The outcomes of Senate races are strongly correlated with each other and with the overall national climate.

That doesn't mean it is impossible for her to lose, but if she loses, it is much more likely to be because the 'very strong Democratic year' turns out to be generally less strong than expected - i.e. if the GOP holds on to NV and AZ (in which case if McCaskill loses, it won't decide control of the Senate).

But what is much less likely is that McCaskill loses while Dems simultaneously pick up NV and AZ, and maybe run close races in TN and TX. If Dems pick up NV and AZ and run close (or even win) in TN and TX, it is quite unlikely that McCaskill will lose re-election, and it probably won't even be particularly close.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #52 on: December 18, 2017, 03:44:12 PM »

What I don't really understand why anyone would view control of the Senate as likely to hinge on Missouri. McCaskill is a 2 term incumbent in what seems likely to be a very strong Democratic year.

The outcomes of Senate races are strongly correlated with each other and with the overall national climate.

That doesn't mean it is impossible for her to lose, but if she loses, it is much more likely to be because the 'very strong Democratic year' turns out to be generally less strong than expected - i.e. if the GOP holds on to NV and AZ (in which case if McCaskill loses, it won't decide control of the Senate).

But what is much less likely is that McCaskill loses while Dems simultaneously pick up NV and AZ, and maybe run close races in TN and TX. If Dems pick up NV and AZ and run close (or even win) in TN and TX, it is quite unlikely that McCaskill will lose re-election, and it probably won't even be particularly close.

I agree with your overall point, but Dems probably win NV before holding MO regardless.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.211 seconds with 14 queries.