Don't you think that's kind of ridiculous?
Referring to the OP, rather than to an imagined question? Not at all.
When it becomes ridiculous to answer the question asked, rather than some other question, then I guess I no longer understand the rules.
I do agree that the answers of many posters will be prejudiced by their view of the religion he created. I may be among the posters. I generally have a positive view of Islam, and of religion in general. In any case I'm not trying to start an argument over religion. I am merely expressing surprise over the results of the poll. They don't have objective answers, though, and I've become a little desensitized to the apparent fact that my view is a minority one. Not particularly important, but maybe something to keep in mind should I ever find myself involved in a public discussion of Mohammed.
Did you read my post?
My point is that you can't have really leave religion out of a view of Mohammed, yet base your opinion on unverified religious texts. It's like, if a book says that I'm the son of God or the final prophet of a God, you wouldn't expect a dispassionate, objective view of my character. The quran or the oral tradition associated with it are not good historical, trustworthy sources.
Take a more modern example:
We actually have non-biased information on Joseph Smith and L. Ron Hubbard. If you only looked at their religious texts and ignored everything else, you might think they were great men. Yet, non-biased objective sources of information shows that they both were terrible liars and crooks.
If you purely at the historical Mohammed, it's:
A warlord who lived in the Middle East, maybe Arabia, and was one of the key figures in a religious movement that became Islam.
I don't believe in getting all angry or enamored with historical figures like that either way. Genghis Khan, Julius Caesar and Mohammed became celebrated because they were "great men" of history. But, we don't factor in the view of their victims or the negative impact they had. It's all about the mark they left. With time, that normative view goes away and you just tend to evaluate people from how much they impacted their world.