Puerto Rico territorial status (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 06:43:40 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Puerto Rico territorial status (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: what should happen to Puerto Rico
#1
statehood
 
#2
the current status quo should remain
 
#3
become a sovereign independent Nation
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 48

Author Topic: Puerto Rico territorial status  (Read 2048 times)
politicallefty
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,314
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -9.22

P P
« on: March 06, 2013, 09:15:31 AM »

I'm very much pro-statehood. If Congress takes up the issue, it'll probably require another referendum (probably an up-or-down yes/no vote on statehood). Even if you don't fully accept the second part of last year's referendum, it's clear that the people of Puerto Rico have voted against the status quo. I think Congress needs to take some action.
Logged
politicallefty
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,314
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -9.22

P P
« Reply #1 on: March 09, 2013, 04:25:09 AM »

Under the 2010 Census, with no other state losing representatives, Puerto Rico gets 5 Representatives.  It would have gotten 6 with the 2000 Census numbers.  It likely gets 5 in 2020, with or without a return to 435.  And I think a return to 435 is likely.  The small states perceive they have more political power with a smaller House.

I don't know if a substantially larger House is possible, but I could see the House increasing in a way as to not make PR statehood penalize the states that would lose representation. An even-numbered House is taboo (and for good reason), so 440 would not work. I don't know if there's a certain number that sounds good, but maybe something like 441 (or even 445 or 449). I'd say it's unlikely the House reverts to 435 with PR statehood. (Note that even with the DC Voting Rights Act, the proposal was for a permanent increase to 437.)
Logged
politicallefty
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,314
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -9.22

P P
« Reply #2 on: March 09, 2013, 05:35:17 AM »

We nearly always have at least one vacancy anyway, so it wouldn't really make much difference whether it's odd or even.

It's usually the case that any vacancies are safe seats. Even so, I think most would rather have a full House at an odd number. An odd-numbered House will give an absolute result. If all Members of Congress voted, I'd rather not have the Speakership (and Majority) tied up as a result of an even-numbered House.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 12 queries.