How large of a Clinton win is needed to "send a message?" (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 15, 2024, 11:42:07 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  How large of a Clinton win is needed to "send a message?" (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: How large of a Clinton win is needed to "send a message?"
#1
3% or less		  
#2
4-5%		  
#3
6-7%		  
#4
8-9%		  
#5
10-11%		  
#6
12%+		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 58

Author Topic: How large of a Clinton win is needed to "send a message?"  (Read 1265 times)
Seriously?
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,029
United States


« on: August 23, 2016, 12:23:22 AM »
No message and no size of message will matter if the Republicans still control the House.
Logged
Seriously?
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,029
United States


« Reply #1 on: August 23, 2016, 12:39:06 AM »
Quote from: Ogre Mage on August 23, 2016, 12:25:40 AM
Quote from: Seriously? on August 23, 2016, 12:23:22 AM
No message and no size of message will matter if the Republicans still control the House.

Incorrect.  The House has no say over appointments to the judiciary or the federal agencies.
Well good luck getting to 60 Democrats in the Senate to stop the Republicans in their advise and consent role then.
Logged
Seriously?
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,029
United States


« Reply #2 on: August 23, 2016, 12:47:58 AM »
« Edited: August 23, 2016, 12:53:27 AM by Seriously? »
Quote from: Ogre Mage on August 23, 2016, 12:43:02 AM
Quote from: Seriously? on August 23, 2016, 12:39:06 AM
Quote from: Ogre Mage on August 23, 2016, 12:25:40 AM
Quote from: Seriously? on August 23, 2016, 12:23:22 AM
No message and no size of message will matter if the Republicans still control the House.

Incorrect.  The House has no say over appointments to the judiciary or the federal agencies.
Well good luck getting to 60 Democrats in the Senate to stop the Republicans in their advise and consent role then.

Go ahead.  Remember what happened when the Senate GOP would not stop filibustering Obama's three nominees to the D.C. Circuit?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/senates-filibuster-decision-could-reshape-influential-dc-federal-appeals-court/2013/11/21/3b3fd76a-52de-11e3-a7f0-b790929232e1_story.html
Yes. I remember the stories being written about the doom and gloom of the Republicans. I am sure if I were on Atlas at the time, I would have read thread after thread about how the GOP was finished.  Then 2014 happened... How did that go again? Oh yeah... The Democrats lost the Senate. Doom and gloom, as always, averted.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 13 queries.