Should 2nd Amendment People do something about Clinton?

[Seriously?]

Of course they should. They should show up at the ballot box en masse against Clinton. That's how democracy works.

The other stuff you are insinuating, of course not.

[Seriously?]

Lol at all the votes for "they should go after Trump instead." I guess Hillary really was a trendsetter in 2008! So progressive and ahead of the curve.

https://youtu.be/nC6Sa8t9Ywg

SUNY Cornell graduate Keith Olberman is a loser. Watching that clip made my skin crawl. But it does bring to bear that candidates stay dumb things all the time.

Remember when Hillary! said she wanted to "tax the middle class?" When was that again? A few years ago? No try last week.

[Seriously?]

Remember when Hillary! [sic] said she wanted to "tax the middle class?" When was that again? A few years ago? No try last week.

Please stop lying.

Lying? That's exactly what Hillary! said. Listen for yourself.
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ua13_gYQn0

[Seriously?]

Remember when Hillary! [sic] said she wanted to "tax the middle class?" When was that again? A few years ago? No try last week.

Please stop lying.

Lying? That's exactly what Hillary! said. Listen for yourself.
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ua13_gYQn0

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/aug/05/donald-trump/donald-trump-wrongly-says-hillary-clinton-wants-ra/

Enjoy your Pants on Fire claim. As a linguist myself, I can verify that the methods used were sound and were the same ones I used to identify the same results they concluded. Not like you credibility could be shot any more.

Dude, she f#^@ing misspoke. It happens in politics. She meant to say one thing, but said another. Look up the word gaffe and stop trying to cover for her.

[Seriously?]

Remember when Hillary! [sic] said she wanted to "tax the middle class?" When was that again? A few years ago? No try last week.

Please stop lying.

Lying? That's exactly what Hillary! said. Listen for yourself.
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ua13_gYQn0

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/aug/05/donald-trump/donald-trump-wrongly-says-hillary-clinton-wants-ra/

Enjoy your Pants on Fire claim. As a linguist myself, I can verify that the methods used were sound and were the same ones I used to identify the same results they concluded. Not like you credibility could be shot any more.

Dude, she f#^@ing misspoke. It happens in politics. She meant to say one thing, but said another. Look up the word gaffe and stop trying to cover for her.

No, sorry, there's this thing in speech called phonetic assimilation that happens with all speakers. Now, speakers of a certain dialect have word coda t-deletion as part of one of those assimilatory processes. However, the contraction is still marked by the N sonorant consonant on the sound spectograph even when part of the contraction is omitted.

You are way out of your league trying to contest this with me. She didn't misspeak. The best you could argue is that she didn't articulate it clearly enough for certain speakers who aren't keen on picking up on these, but that falls way short of saying that's what she said. The cold hard evidence is there in the audio clip. You can't argue this. I'm sorry.

Talk about putting lipstick on a pig. You want to call it that she didn't articulate properly, fine. It still came off to the audience as she wanted to raise taxes on the freaking middle class.

In the real world we call them gaffes. It happens. Even to Queen Hillary!

[Seriously?]

It's a mistake. Mistakes happen. You take your lumps, issue a clarifying statement and move on.

It's pretty darn clear what Hillary said during that speech. Of course her rivals are going to pick on her about it. It's politics.

Trump was inartful today. Nothing more. Nothing less. He was not advocating anything close to what you leftists claim. He issued a clarifying statement. Of course the left and their DNC presttitutes will make a huge story about this. Trump will take his lumps and move on. Again, it's politics.