Would Sanders have done better or worse than Clinton in Virginia in 2016? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 12, 2024, 04:37:14 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Would Sanders have done better or worse than Clinton in Virginia in 2016? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Would Sanders have done better or worse than Clinton in Virginia in 2016?
#1
Better		  
#2
Worse		  
#3
No difference		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 146

Author Topic: Would Sanders have done better or worse than Clinton in Virginia in 2016?  (Read 6702 times)
Arturo Belano
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,471


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -6.43
« on: January 22, 2019, 08:58:10 AM »
Quote from: Tulsi Gabbard Is A Fraud on January 21, 2019, 04:10:54 AM
Slightly worse, but I don't think that support would have gone to Trump. Sanders would have won 48-44 or 47-44.

This. Turnout would've been slightly depressed and there would have been a slight boost potentially for the Libertarians. But I'm skeptical at the idea that a Sanders nomination would have allowed Trump to close a five point gap and at the idea that Virginian Democrats are a white suburban mom monolith that would rather vote for Trump over social democracy.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 14 queries.