Schumer: Trump Is Not Going to Get the Wall in Any Form (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 25, 2024, 07:42:27 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Schumer: Trump Is Not Going to Get the Wall in Any Form (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Schumer: Trump Is Not Going to Get the Wall in Any Form  (Read 2078 times)
Fuzzy Bear
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,078
United States


WWW
« on: December 16, 2018, 08:36:46 PM »

Bill Clinton in his 1995 SOTU:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Barack Obama in 2005:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Barack Obama in 2006:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Barbara Boxer in 2006:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

The Boston Globe: “In 2006, Democrats Were Saying'‘Build That Fence!'”:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Hillary Clinton in November 2015:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.


Wow! It's almost like Democrats across the board think immigration and border security are real concerns, and are opposed to a useless waste of billions on Demented Donald's desperate attempt to erect a monument to his ego and xenophobia.

Thank you for the enlightening post!

It's the actions people take that reflect their priorities, not their rhetoric.

When one makes such proclamations, but vote against every single proposal in Congress that would be a step toward that goal, they are hypocrites.  They're like alcoholics who view sobriety as a great idea, but who reject every entreaty to go to detox, treatment, AA, etc.  The GOP and its pols have made any number of similar statements about issues of racial equality and being non-biased toward minorities; to all the folks Amening the Democrats on immigration give the GOP the same props, in light of their record on Voter ID issues? 

The Democrats are all in on open border; it works to their favor to have endless and unchecked immigration, and particularly immigration from Mexico and Central America.  They see Democrats Of The Future in "The Caravan" and think not one whit about the well-being of the American nation in their reasoning.  It's all politics.  This is not to say that the GOP isn't equally thoughtless toward the common weal of Americans on other key issues, but let's not provide the Democrats the sort of fig leaf they don't have on this issue.
Logged
Fuzzy Bear
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,078
United States


WWW
« Reply #1 on: December 16, 2018, 09:28:15 PM »

Just exactly what are people cheering for here?

Are they cheering for not spending the money on a wall?  Or are they cheering for open borders, and ignoring our current immigration laws?

I tend to believe the latter.  Those who say "GOOD!" need to state what policies they DO advocate to prevent persons from illegally entering our borders.  After all, they don't approve of illegal immigration . . . or do they?
Logged
Fuzzy Bear
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,078
United States


WWW
« Reply #2 on: December 16, 2018, 10:06:19 PM »

Just exactly what are people cheering for here?

Are they cheering for not spending the money on a wall?  Or are they cheering for open borders, and ignoring our current immigration laws?

I tend to believe the latter.  Those who say "GOOD!" need to state what policies they DO advocate to prevent persons from illegally entering our borders.  After all, they don't approve of illegal immigration . . . or do they?

Huh? Obama certainly didn’t have “open borders”. In fact, many deportations occurred under Obama. Moreover, most illegal immigrants are here because of overstaying visas as opposed to crossing the border

Unfortunately, you’ve succumbed to the dichotomy that you either support a wall or you support open borders. I encourage you to think critically and not be so easily manipulated by Trump/Fox News personality blowhards

I agree that this is a bit of a false dichotomy.  But I don't see any of those folks decrying Trump's policy meeting me, or people who think as I do, as anything resembling halfway.

I'll say this:  I'd be in favor of a blanket amnesty for folks already here IF we build Trump's Wall.  OR I'd be in favor of citizenship for Dreamers and for amnesties on a case-by-case basis for others here IF we actually complete the Border Fence approved in 2006, and enacted a reduction in overall levels of immigration.  Both of these proposals would include a specific program designed to fully assimilate these immigrants into American culture in the manner immigrants were assimilated during the Ellis Island years. 

Those are my positions.  I'm flexible.  What, exactly, is YOUR position?
Logged
Fuzzy Bear
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,078
United States


WWW
« Reply #3 on: December 16, 2018, 11:04:29 PM »

I am against illegal immigration as well as fences and walls. Obama's push for a fence made me angry due to the ecological impact, and a wall would be even worse. Neither will help with preventing illegal immigration. They're both infuriating andI know many other Democrats who feel the same way. Enjoy burning up your pointless straw man.

I am, however, in favor of making legal immigration much more open and accessible to the average person, and we should not imprison those applying for asylum as if they were criminals. I would be all for funding more border security it it meant not treating humans as if they are animals and we actually made it possible for people to immigrate here without being extremely wealthy or Powerball-levels of lucky.

I am only a second generation American. My grandfather was lucky enough to come here from Germany between the world wars. He escaped being forced into serving Hitler. My dad says much of what is going on here and now reminds him of what his dad told him about 1930s Germany, especially re Muslims and immigrants. I'm not being hyperbolic, nor is my dad. I am very aware of how luckyI am to be American andI am proud to be one. But we must continue to allow immigrants, especially those from troubled countries and destitute backgrounds, if we want to continue to be a great country of innovation and development.

Your first sentence is the same thing as saying, "I am against sexual harassment in the workplace.  I am also against the Federal Government creating and enforcing rules and guidelines that define a Hostile Work Environment and provide meaningful sanctions for persons who create such an environement."  What is the purpose of being "against" something that is wrong if you oppose any sort of meaningful sanction to deter people from wrongdoing.  That's the thing about those who disagree with me here; they insist that they believe that illegal immigration is wrong, but they NEVER propose a remedy, and they criticize every proposed remedy.  If I actually opposed every single remedy for the problem of sexual harassment in the workplace, you would doubt my assertion that I believed it wrong and wished perpetrators to be sanctioned in a meaningful way, and justifiably so.

At least you're honest about at least some of what you want in terms of immigration.  My question is simply this:  Why is it in the interest of American citizens that we take in large numbers of unskilled, needy immigrants from foreign lands who, almost certainly, cannot support themselves in America?  That's a fair and honest question, and it's the question your position raises.

If your rationale is humanitarian, and'or some sort of belief that the United States must (or, at a minimum, should) have extremely liberal immigration policies to better the lot of "The Global Poor", there is an argument for that.  "To whom much is given, much is required" is a Biblical principle, and it ought to be applied to any number of situations.  But there is a real society cost to this, and it comes in dollars and cents in no small part.  I have no doubt that letting large numbers of unskilled, poor immigrants is in the best interest of the immigrants, but is it in the best interests of American citizens and taxpayers?  I understand your well-meaning intentions, and I'm not a party pooper at heart, but there comes a point when folks who advocate large amounts of tax dollars to be spent on unskilled immigrants to salve somebody's conscience ought to be reminded of the principle that some things are not theirs to give away.  The American taxpayer ought to be respected in immigration policy and not just have the burden of foreign poor thrust upon them because others think it right.

Can you make the case as to why public resources should be spent to better the lot of persons who bring nothing to this country but their wants and needs and (in some cases) a willingness to work at unskilled jobs?  That's a fair question.  I'd like to actually hear the answer to it.  All people seem to be able to do is call me names.  Perhaps you'll break the pattern.  I can only hope.
Logged
Fuzzy Bear
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,078
United States


WWW
« Reply #4 on: December 17, 2018, 10:29:02 PM »

Just exactly what are people cheering for here?

Are they cheering for not spending the money on a wall?  Or are they cheering for open borders, and ignoring our current immigration laws?

I tend to believe the latter.  Those who say "GOOD!" need to state what policies they DO advocate to prevent persons from illegally entering our borders.  After all, they don't approve of illegal immigration . . . or do they?

Huh? Obama certainly didn’t have “open borders”. In fact, many deportations occurred under Obama. Moreover, most illegal immigrants are here because of overstaying visas as opposed to crossing the border

Unfortunately, you’ve succumbed to the dichotomy that you either support a wall or you support open borders. I encourage you to think critically and not be so easily manipulated by Trump/Fox News personality blowhards

I agree that this is a bit of a false dichotomy.  But I don't see any of those folks decrying Trump's policy meeting me, or people who think as I do, as anything resembling halfway.

I'll say this:  I'd be in favor of a blanket amnesty for folks already here IF we build Trump's Wall.  OR I'd be in favor of citizenship for Dreamers and for amnesties on a case-by-case basis for others here IF we actually complete the Border Fence approved in 2006, and enacted a reduction in overall levels of immigration.  Both of these proposals would include a specific program designed to fully assimilate these immigrants into American culture in the manner immigrants were assimilated during the Ellis Island years. 

Those are my positions.  I'm flexible.  What, exactly, is YOUR position?
Oh ho ho the facade drops mr “I just hate illegal immigration”

I've posted a number of times that I'm for lower levels of legal immigration as well.  We already have a difficult enough time ensuring enough jobs for our own low-skill workers; open borders will only increase the stress on those folks who are American citizens.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.038 seconds with 12 queries.