Opinion of H.R. 3: No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 15, 2024, 11:36:24 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Opinion of H.R. 3: No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Opinion of H.R. 3: No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act
#1
Freedom Act
 
#2
Horrible Act
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 60

Author Topic: Opinion of H.R. 3: No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act  (Read 1698 times)
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,080
Canada


« on: October 14, 2012, 02:34:30 PM »

It's all bullsh**t. Just another game that people who hate women like to play to score some easy points.

Where will they be for that fetus when it grows up and it can't read because they cut education funding? Where will they be when it needs to go to college? Where will they be when that fetus is retired and needs medicare to pay for their medicine? All things they wanna cut.

Honestly, I'd have rather my mother aborted me than to live the life of a lot of people who I know that are struggling. It would've saved me the time of eventually killing myself, because if I had to live that kind of life for that length of time, always wondering how I'm going to make it to the next paycheck, hoping my medicine could be paid for as well as groceries and bills.... I would not last long.


Oh yes, we all hate women, probably because we got turned down by one in middle school right? :eyeroll:

Either the fetus is a person or it is not. Pro lifers believe that the fetus is a person and therefore enjoys a right to life like anyone else.

Furthermore, your things that you believe to be "needs" are nothing of the sort. Even in places like Sweden, not everyone goes to university, and many of the medicines you think are so important, weren't available until the 20th century. Do you honestly believe that every person who was born before 1900 should have been aborted?

But hey let's take your argument to it's logical conclusion.  Let's have the state pay to euthanize the crippled kid down the street without his consent. After all his life is going to be unpleasant. Hmm, what 20th century political party was in favour of that policy...?
Logged
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,080
Canada


« Reply #1 on: October 31, 2012, 12:38:36 PM »

I feel the same way about war as ardent pro-lifers do about abortion, yet my tax dollars go to fund wars.  Fair should be fair.

Indeed, let's not fund either. Everyone wins. Smiley

This
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 12 queries.