Would Ron Paul be the Republican presidential nominee if he had won Iowa?

[kenyanobama]

No, Republicans wouldn't have voted for a baby killer.

[kenyanobama]

No, Republicans wouldn't have voted for a baby killer.

The Good Dr. Ronald E. Paul is the farthest thing from a "baby killer". He has an incredibly pro-life voting record. Moreso than Romney, as I'm sure you know. What, in your mind, could possibly make him a "baby killer"?

Babies died while their mothers were under RongPaul's care. Instead of staying up to date in medicine he spent his time studying economics, history, and his version of the Constitution. Instead of upholding his oath and providing the best care possible for his patients he was off chasing his own little dream. Ron Paul would rather learn to be a good Muslim, or learn Chinese, than commit troops to a conflict or prepare this nation for a war.

He is a coward, a wimp, a liar. He let babies die while he learned about economics.

[kenyanobama]

No, Republicans wouldn't have voted for a baby killer.

The Good Dr. Ronald E. Paul is the farthest thing from a "baby killer". He has an incredibly pro-life voting record. Moreso than Romney, as I'm sure you know. What, in your mind, could possibly make him a "baby killer"?

Babies died while their mothers were under RongPaul's care. Instead of staying up to date in medicine he spent his time studying economics, history, and his version of the Constitution. Instead of upholding his oath and providing the best care possible for his patients he was off chasing his own little dream. Ron Paul would rather learn to be a good Muslim, or learn Chinese, than commit troops to a conflict or prepare this nation for a war.

He is a coward, a wimp, a liar. He let babies die while he learned about economics.

And pray tell where did you hear this about Dr. Paul?

The Hannity Forums, why?

[kenyanobama]

No, Republicans wouldn't have voted for a baby killer.

The Good Dr. Ronald E. Paul is the farthest thing from a "baby killer". He has an incredibly pro-life voting record. Moreso than Romney, as I'm sure you know. What, in your mind, could possibly make him a "baby killer"?

Babies died while their mothers were under RongPaul's care. Instead of staying up to date in medicine he spent his time studying economics, history, and his version of the Constitution. Instead of upholding his oath and providing the best care possible for his patients he was off chasing his own little dream. Ron Paul would rather learn to be a good Muslim, or learn Chinese, than commit troops to a conflict or prepare this nation for a war.

He is a coward, a wimp, a liar. He let babies die while he learned about economics.

I don't like Paul's foreign policy either, but this goes too far.

No, Ron Paul reneged on his doctor's oath to become a politician. He contributed to the world-wide shortage of doctors and is responsible for the death of millions.