Who is more impervious to logic and reason?

[Oldiesfreak1854]

Oldiesfreak isn't really impervious to "logic" and "reason", just evidence he doesn't like.
JJ is.
Answer is obvious.

Just about everybody on here is impervious to "logic and reason" (I.e. facts they don't like.)

[Oldiesfreak1854]

Oldies seems to be more insistent on his ridiculous views, no?  Doesn't J.J. at least drop the argument after a certain point, then move on to the next absurdity?

Your views are the ones that are ridiculous and absurd based on logic and reason.

[Oldiesfreak1854]

JJ is the grand champ.

I really haven't paid any attention to the other guy though.

He basically argues that the record of Democrats on civil rights over 50 years ago and Abraham Lincoln are the main reasons you should vote Republican today. Also apparently the Southern Strategy was an anti-racist strategy aimed at attracting pro-civil rights moderates.

But that's true.  It would have made no sense for the GOP to pander to racists in 1968 because George Wallace was running.  And I have plenty of other reasons to vote Republican today that are more recent.