Which Would You Rather Live In? Part 2 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 03:36:55 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Which Would You Rather Live In? Part 2 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Vote
#1
Society A - No gun restrictions, and a very low crime rate
 
#2
Society B - Guns are illegal, but crime rates are high
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 35

Author Topic: Which Would You Rather Live In? Part 2  (Read 1948 times)
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

« on: January 06, 2006, 05:38:03 PM »

There is no other way that the "armed safe" scenario could possibly be in existence.

And why is that?

Because, obviously, poverty creates crime.  The only thing that makes people 'safe' is being physically separated from poverty.

Don't you think it would lower the crime rate if the criminal wasn't sure whether owner of the home he's going to rob owns a bazooka or not?

Quite frankly, I'd feign robbing a house if I knew the guy had a bazooka because then I could watch him blow his house up. Tongue
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 13 queries.